早产儿动脉导管未闭保守治疗后的临床结果

Cristina Borràs‐Novell , Ana Riverola , Victoria Aldecoa‐Bilbao , Montserrat Izquierdo , Monica Domingo , Martín Iriondo
{"title":"早产儿动脉导管未闭保守治疗后的临床结果","authors":"Cristina Borràs‐Novell ,&nbsp;Ana Riverola ,&nbsp;Victoria Aldecoa‐Bilbao ,&nbsp;Montserrat Izquierdo ,&nbsp;Monica Domingo ,&nbsp;Martín Iriondo","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2018.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Management of patent ductus arteriosus is still controversial. This study aimed to describe the impact of a more conservative approach on treatment rates and on main outcomes of prematurity, especially in preterm infants with &lt;26 weeks of gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Clinical charts review of infants ≤30 weeks with patent ductus arteriosus between 2009 and 2016 at two centers. In 2011, the authors changed patent ductus arteriosus management: in first period (2009–2011), patients who failed medical treatment underwent surgical closure; in second period (2012–2016), only those with cardiopulmonary compromise underwent surgical ligation. Medical treatment, surgical closure, mortality, and survival‐without‐morbidity were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 188 patients (27<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2 weeks, 973<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->272 grams); 63 in P1 and 125 in P2. In P2, significantly lower rates of medical treatment (85.7% P1 <em>versus</em> 56% P2, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and surgical closure (34.5% P1 <em>versus</em> 16.1% P2, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) were observed. No differences were found in chronic lung disease (28.8% <em>versus</em> 13.9%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.056), severe retinopathy of prematurity (7.5% <em>versus</em> 11.8%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.403), necrotizing enterocolitis (15.5% <em>versus</em> 6.9%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.071), severe intraventricular hemorrhage (25.4% <em>versus</em> 18.4%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.264), mortality (17.5% <em>versus</em> 15.2%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.690) or survival‐without‐morbidity adjusted OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.10 (95% CI: 0.55–2.22); <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.783. In P2, 24.5% patients were discharged with patent ductus arteriosus. The subgroup born between 23 and 26 weeks (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->82) showed significant differences: lower incidence of chronic lung disease (50% <em>versus</em> 19.6%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.019) and more survival‐without‐morbidity (20% <em>versus</em> 45.6%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.028) were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A conservative approach in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus can avoid medical and surgical treatments, without a significant impact in survival‐without‐morbidity. However, two‐thirds of preterm infants under 26 weeks are still treated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 2","pages":"Pages 177-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2018.10.007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes after more conservative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Borràs‐Novell ,&nbsp;Ana Riverola ,&nbsp;Victoria Aldecoa‐Bilbao ,&nbsp;Montserrat Izquierdo ,&nbsp;Monica Domingo ,&nbsp;Martín Iriondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedp.2018.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Management of patent ductus arteriosus is still controversial. This study aimed to describe the impact of a more conservative approach on treatment rates and on main outcomes of prematurity, especially in preterm infants with &lt;26 weeks of gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Clinical charts review of infants ≤30 weeks with patent ductus arteriosus between 2009 and 2016 at two centers. In 2011, the authors changed patent ductus arteriosus management: in first period (2009–2011), patients who failed medical treatment underwent surgical closure; in second period (2012–2016), only those with cardiopulmonary compromise underwent surgical ligation. Medical treatment, surgical closure, mortality, and survival‐without‐morbidity were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 188 patients (27<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2 weeks, 973<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->272 grams); 63 in P1 and 125 in P2. In P2, significantly lower rates of medical treatment (85.7% P1 <em>versus</em> 56% P2, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and surgical closure (34.5% P1 <em>versus</em> 16.1% P2, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) were observed. No differences were found in chronic lung disease (28.8% <em>versus</em> 13.9%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.056), severe retinopathy of prematurity (7.5% <em>versus</em> 11.8%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.403), necrotizing enterocolitis (15.5% <em>versus</em> 6.9%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.071), severe intraventricular hemorrhage (25.4% <em>versus</em> 18.4%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.264), mortality (17.5% <em>versus</em> 15.2%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.690) or survival‐without‐morbidity adjusted OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.10 (95% CI: 0.55–2.22); <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.783. In P2, 24.5% patients were discharged with patent ductus arteriosus. The subgroup born between 23 and 26 weeks (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->82) showed significant differences: lower incidence of chronic lung disease (50% <em>versus</em> 19.6%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.019) and more survival‐without‐morbidity (20% <em>versus</em> 45.6%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.028) were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A conservative approach in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus can avoid medical and surgical treatments, without a significant impact in survival‐without‐morbidity. However, two‐thirds of preterm infants under 26 weeks are still treated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)\",\"volume\":\"96 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 177-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2018.10.007\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619300709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619300709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的动脉导管未闭的治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在描述更保守的方法对治疗率和早产儿主要结局的影响,特别是对妊娠26周的早产儿。方法回顾2009 - 2016年两个中心≤30周动脉导管未闭患儿的临床资料。2011年,作者改变了动脉导管未闭的治疗方法:在第一期(2009-2011年),药物治疗失败的患者接受手术治疗;在第二阶段(2012-2016),只有心肺功能受损的患者接受了手术结扎。比较了药物治疗、手术闭合、死亡率和无发病生存率。结果188例患者(27±2周,973±272克);P1为63,P2为125。在P2中,医疗率显著降低(P1为85.7%,P2为56%,p <0.001)和手术闭合(34.5% P1 vs 16.1% P2, p <0.001)。慢性肺部疾病(28.8%比13.9%,p = 0.056)、严重早产儿视网膜病变(7.5%比11.8%,p = 0.403)、坏死性小肠结肠炎(15.5%比6.9%,p = 0.071)、严重脑室内出血(25.4%比18.4%,p = 0.264)、死亡率(17.5%比15.2%,p = 0.690)或无发病生存率调整or = 1.10 (95% CI: 0.55-2.22);p = 0.783。在P2组,24.5%的患者因动脉导管未闭出院。出生在23周至26周的亚组(n = 82)显示出显著差异:慢性肺病发病率较低(50%对19.6%,p = 0.019),无发病生存率较高(20%对45.6%,p = 0.028)。结论对动脉导管未闭早产儿采用保守入路可避免药物和手术治疗,对生存率无明显影响。然而,26周以下的早产儿仍有三分之二得到治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes after more conservative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants

Objective

Management of patent ductus arteriosus is still controversial. This study aimed to describe the impact of a more conservative approach on treatment rates and on main outcomes of prematurity, especially in preterm infants with <26 weeks of gestation.

Method

Clinical charts review of infants ≤30 weeks with patent ductus arteriosus between 2009 and 2016 at two centers. In 2011, the authors changed patent ductus arteriosus management: in first period (2009–2011), patients who failed medical treatment underwent surgical closure; in second period (2012–2016), only those with cardiopulmonary compromise underwent surgical ligation. Medical treatment, surgical closure, mortality, and survival‐without‐morbidity were compared.

Results

This study included 188 patients (27 ± 2 weeks, 973 ± 272 grams); 63 in P1 and 125 in P2. In P2, significantly lower rates of medical treatment (85.7% P1 versus 56% P2, p < 0.001) and surgical closure (34.5% P1 versus 16.1% P2, p < 0.001) were observed. No differences were found in chronic lung disease (28.8% versus 13.9%, p = 0.056), severe retinopathy of prematurity (7.5% versus 11.8%, p = 0.403), necrotizing enterocolitis (15.5% versus 6.9%, p = 0.071), severe intraventricular hemorrhage (25.4% versus 18.4%, p = 0.264), mortality (17.5% versus 15.2%, p = 0.690) or survival‐without‐morbidity adjusted OR = 1.10 (95% CI: 0.55–2.22); p = 0.783. In P2, 24.5% patients were discharged with patent ductus arteriosus. The subgroup born between 23 and 26 weeks (n = 82) showed significant differences: lower incidence of chronic lung disease (50% versus 19.6%, p = 0.019) and more survival‐without‐morbidity (20% versus 45.6%, p = 0.028) were found.

Conclusion

A conservative approach in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus can avoid medical and surgical treatments, without a significant impact in survival‐without‐morbidity. However, two‐thirds of preterm infants under 26 weeks are still treated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信