Gabriela Guimarães Vieira , Luciana Bandeira Mendez Ribeiro , Sabine Kruger Truppel , Nelson Augusto Rosário Filho , Mário César Vieira
{"title":"对质子泵抑制剂有反应和无反应的嗜酸性食管炎患者的内镜和组织学特征","authors":"Gabriela Guimarães Vieira , Luciana Bandeira Mendez Ribeiro , Sabine Kruger Truppel , Nelson Augusto Rosário Filho , Mário César Vieira","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare endoscopic and histologic features of pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) responding to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to those not responding to PPI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Endoscopic reports and photographs of patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥15 eosinophils per high-powered field (eos/hpf) in esophageal biopsies prior to PPI trial were reviewed. Patients were classified as responsive to PPI (PPIREoE) or non-responsive to PPI (PPINREoE) according to response totreatment (<15 eos/hpf) at second endoscopy after 8 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 231 patients (72.3% male), 64 (27.7%) were responsive to the proton pump inhibitors. Edema (77.3% <em>vs</em>. 62.5%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.031) and vertical lines (69.5% <em>vs</em>. 51.6%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014) were more frequent in PPINREoE patients. An eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus ≥ 35 eos/HPF (25.1% <em>vs</em>. 12.5%) was more frequent in these patients (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). Those with eosinophil count <<!--> <!-->15 eos/HPF in the mid‐esophagus at the first endoscopy were more likely to respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors compared to patients with 15‐34 eos/HPF (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.46‐7.24) and to patients with ≥ 35 eos/HPF (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006, OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.39‐7.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Edema and vertical lines at the endoscopy and a higher eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus were more frequent in patients who were non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors. As there were no significant differences in the other findings between the groups, it cannot be affirmed that these characteristics are sufficient to differentiate between PPINREoE and PPIREoE patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100742,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","volume":"96 5","pages":"Pages 638-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic and histological characteristics in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis responsive and non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Guimarães Vieira , Luciana Bandeira Mendez Ribeiro , Sabine Kruger Truppel , Nelson Augusto Rosário Filho , Mário César Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare endoscopic and histologic features of pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) responding to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to those not responding to PPI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Endoscopic reports and photographs of patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥15 eosinophils per high-powered field (eos/hpf) in esophageal biopsies prior to PPI trial were reviewed. Patients were classified as responsive to PPI (PPIREoE) or non-responsive to PPI (PPINREoE) according to response totreatment (<15 eos/hpf) at second endoscopy after 8 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 231 patients (72.3% male), 64 (27.7%) were responsive to the proton pump inhibitors. Edema (77.3% <em>vs</em>. 62.5%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.031) and vertical lines (69.5% <em>vs</em>. 51.6%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014) were more frequent in PPINREoE patients. An eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus ≥ 35 eos/HPF (25.1% <em>vs</em>. 12.5%) was more frequent in these patients (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). Those with eosinophil count <<!--> <!-->15 eos/HPF in the mid‐esophagus at the first endoscopy were more likely to respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors compared to patients with 15‐34 eos/HPF (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.46‐7.24) and to patients with ≥ 35 eos/HPF (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006, OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.39‐7.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Edema and vertical lines at the endoscopy and a higher eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus were more frequent in patients who were non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors. As there were no significant differences in the other findings between the groups, it cannot be affirmed that these characteristics are sufficient to differentiate between PPINREoE and PPIREoE patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)\",\"volume\":\"96 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 638-643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.05.028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619301454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de Pediatria (Vers?o em Português)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553619301454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic and histological characteristics in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis responsive and non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors
Objective
To compare endoscopic and histologic features of pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) responding to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to those not responding to PPI.
Methods
Endoscopic reports and photographs of patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥15 eosinophils per high-powered field (eos/hpf) in esophageal biopsies prior to PPI trial were reviewed. Patients were classified as responsive to PPI (PPIREoE) or non-responsive to PPI (PPINREoE) according to response totreatment (<15 eos/hpf) at second endoscopy after 8 weeks.
Results
Of the 231 patients (72.3% male), 64 (27.7%) were responsive to the proton pump inhibitors. Edema (77.3% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.031) and vertical lines (69.5% vs. 51.6%, p = 0.014) were more frequent in PPINREoE patients. An eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus ≥ 35 eos/HPF (25.1% vs. 12.5%) was more frequent in these patients (p = 0.001). Those with eosinophil count < 15 eos/HPF in the mid‐esophagus at the first endoscopy were more likely to respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors compared to patients with 15‐34 eos/HPF (p = 0.004, OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.46‐7.24) and to patients with ≥ 35 eos/HPF (p = 0.006, OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.39‐7.41).
Conclusion
Edema and vertical lines at the endoscopy and a higher eosinophil count in the mid‐esophagus were more frequent in patients who were non‐responsive to proton pump inhibitors. As there were no significant differences in the other findings between the groups, it cannot be affirmed that these characteristics are sufficient to differentiate between PPINREoE and PPIREoE patients.