无论gnrh激动剂和gnrh拮抗剂方案如何,正常反应的女性卵巢卵泡内维持fVEGF和sVEGFR1的生理平衡

Neena Malhotra , Asmita Patil , Nalin Mehta , Harpal Rana , Jayasree Sengupta , Debabrata Ghosh
{"title":"无论gnrh激动剂和gnrh拮抗剂方案如何,正常反应的女性卵巢卵泡内维持fVEGF和sVEGFR1的生理平衡","authors":"Neena Malhotra ,&nbsp;Asmita Patil ,&nbsp;Nalin Mehta ,&nbsp;Harpal Rana ,&nbsp;Jayasree Sengupta ,&nbsp;Debabrata Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2014.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hypothesis that there exists a differential association between total free VEGF (fVEGF) and soluble VEGF-receptor1 (sVEGFR1) in follicular fluid obtained from GnRH-agonist (GnRH-a) <em>versus</em><span> GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols was examined. It was observed that: (i) concentration of total fVEGF in follicular fluid retrieved from GnRH-ant group was higher than that in GnRH-a group, (ii) it was three-times higher than that of VEGF-A alone as reported in the previous study, and (iii) follicular concentration of sVEGFR1 showed no significant difference between two groups. Finally, our hypothesis that ratios of follicular sVEGFR to fVEGF might show differential profiles between two protocols was not found tenable. We conclude that the physiological balance between sVEGFR1 and total fVEGF is maintained within a ratio of 2–3 in ovarian follicles in normoresponder women irrespective of GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocols.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2014.10.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiological balance between fVEGF and sVEGFR1 is maintained within ovarian follicles in normoresponder women irrespective of GnRH-agonist and GnRH-antagonist protocols\",\"authors\":\"Neena Malhotra ,&nbsp;Asmita Patil ,&nbsp;Nalin Mehta ,&nbsp;Harpal Rana ,&nbsp;Jayasree Sengupta ,&nbsp;Debabrata Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrhm.2014.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The hypothesis that there exists a differential association between total free VEGF (fVEGF) and soluble VEGF-receptor1 (sVEGFR1) in follicular fluid obtained from GnRH-agonist (GnRH-a) <em>versus</em><span> GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols was examined. It was observed that: (i) concentration of total fVEGF in follicular fluid retrieved from GnRH-ant group was higher than that in GnRH-a group, (ii) it was three-times higher than that of VEGF-A alone as reported in the previous study, and (iii) follicular concentration of sVEGFR1 showed no significant difference between two groups. Finally, our hypothesis that ratios of follicular sVEGFR to fVEGF might show differential profiles between two protocols was not found tenable. We conclude that the physiological balance between sVEGFR1 and total fVEGF is maintained within a ratio of 2–3 in ovarian follicles in normoresponder women irrespective of GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocols.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2014.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X14000047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X14000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究人员检验了gnrh激动剂(GnRH-a)和gnrh拮抗剂(GnRH-ant)获得的卵泡液中总游离VEGF (fVEGF)和可溶性VEGF受体1 (sVEGFR1)之间存在差异的假设。我们观察到:(i) GnRH-ant组提取的卵泡液中总fVEGF浓度高于GnRH-a组,(ii)比既往研究报道的单独VEGF-A组高3倍,(iii)两组间滤泡中sVEGFR1浓度无显著差异。最后,我们关于卵泡sVEGFR与fVEGF比值在两种方案中可能表现出差异的假设是站不住脚的。我们得出结论,无论GnRH-a和GnRH-ant方案如何,在正常反应的女性卵巢卵泡中,sVEGFR1和总fVEGF之间的生理平衡维持在2-3的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiological balance between fVEGF and sVEGFR1 is maintained within ovarian follicles in normoresponder women irrespective of GnRH-agonist and GnRH-antagonist protocols

The hypothesis that there exists a differential association between total free VEGF (fVEGF) and soluble VEGF-receptor1 (sVEGFR1) in follicular fluid obtained from GnRH-agonist (GnRH-a) versus GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols was examined. It was observed that: (i) concentration of total fVEGF in follicular fluid retrieved from GnRH-ant group was higher than that in GnRH-a group, (ii) it was three-times higher than that of VEGF-A alone as reported in the previous study, and (iii) follicular concentration of sVEGFR1 showed no significant difference between two groups. Finally, our hypothesis that ratios of follicular sVEGFR to fVEGF might show differential profiles between two protocols was not found tenable. We conclude that the physiological balance between sVEGFR1 and total fVEGF is maintained within a ratio of 2–3 in ovarian follicles in normoresponder women irrespective of GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信