不同包被缓冲液对ELISA单克隆抗体特异性的检测敏感性和分化

J.C. Craig , D. Parkinson , L. Goatley , N. Knowles
{"title":"不同包被缓冲液对ELISA单克隆抗体特异性的检测敏感性和分化","authors":"J.C. Craig ,&nbsp;D. Parkinson ,&nbsp;L. Goatley ,&nbsp;N. Knowles","doi":"10.1016/0092-1157(89)90020-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Buffers of different pH and ionic strength were employed as coating buffers for antigen adsorption to microtitre plates. Their efficiency for coating plates with rinderpest virus (RPV) and foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) antigens was studied by ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody preparations.</p><p>While the adsorption and detection of RPV antigen with polyclonal antiserum was highly dependent on the ionic strength and pH of coating buffer, adsorption of antigenically active FMDV antigen was relatively unaffected by the buffering conditions. Both antigens were adsorbed optimally in 0·01 <span>m</span> phosphate buffer, pH 8·0.</p><p>When monoclonal antibodies were used to detect antigen, there was a greater degree of dependence on the coating buffer than that found with polyclonal antisera. Moreover, when they were used to detect antigen adsorbed under several buffering conditions, monoclonal antibodies showed a variety of preferred buffers. The usefulness of this differential reactivity in distinguishing epitope specificity is demonstrated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological standardization","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 281-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(89)90020-6","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assay sensitivity and differentiation of monoclonal antibody specificity in ELISA with different coating buffers\",\"authors\":\"J.C. Craig ,&nbsp;D. Parkinson ,&nbsp;L. Goatley ,&nbsp;N. Knowles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0092-1157(89)90020-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Buffers of different pH and ionic strength were employed as coating buffers for antigen adsorption to microtitre plates. Their efficiency for coating plates with rinderpest virus (RPV) and foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) antigens was studied by ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody preparations.</p><p>While the adsorption and detection of RPV antigen with polyclonal antiserum was highly dependent on the ionic strength and pH of coating buffer, adsorption of antigenically active FMDV antigen was relatively unaffected by the buffering conditions. Both antigens were adsorbed optimally in 0·01 <span>m</span> phosphate buffer, pH 8·0.</p><p>When monoclonal antibodies were used to detect antigen, there was a greater degree of dependence on the coating buffer than that found with polyclonal antisera. Moreover, when they were used to detect antigen adsorbed under several buffering conditions, monoclonal antibodies showed a variety of preferred buffers. The usefulness of this differential reactivity in distinguishing epitope specificity is demonstrated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biological standardization\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 281-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(89)90020-6\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biological standardization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092115789900206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092115789900206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

采用不同pH和离子强度的缓冲液作为抗原在微滴板上吸附的包被缓冲液。采用ELISA方法,用多克隆抗体和单克隆抗体制备牛瘟病毒(RPV)和口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)抗原包被板的效果进行了研究。多克隆抗血清对RPV抗原的吸附和检测高度依赖于包被缓冲液的离子强度和pH,而对具有抗原活性的FMDV抗原的吸附相对不受缓冲条件的影响。两种抗原在0.01 m、pH为8.0的磷酸盐缓冲液中吸附效果最佳。当单克隆抗体用于检测抗原时,与多克隆抗血清相比,对涂层缓冲液的依赖程度更大。此外,当它们用于检测在几种缓冲条件下吸附的抗原时,单克隆抗体表现出多种首选缓冲液。这种差异反应性在区分表位特异性方面的有用性得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assay sensitivity and differentiation of monoclonal antibody specificity in ELISA with different coating buffers

Buffers of different pH and ionic strength were employed as coating buffers for antigen adsorption to microtitre plates. Their efficiency for coating plates with rinderpest virus (RPV) and foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) antigens was studied by ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody preparations.

While the adsorption and detection of RPV antigen with polyclonal antiserum was highly dependent on the ionic strength and pH of coating buffer, adsorption of antigenically active FMDV antigen was relatively unaffected by the buffering conditions. Both antigens were adsorbed optimally in 0·01 m phosphate buffer, pH 8·0.

When monoclonal antibodies were used to detect antigen, there was a greater degree of dependence on the coating buffer than that found with polyclonal antisera. Moreover, when they were used to detect antigen adsorbed under several buffering conditions, monoclonal antibodies showed a variety of preferred buffers. The usefulness of this differential reactivity in distinguishing epitope specificity is demonstrated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信