米非司酮2.5、5、10 mg与安慰剂治疗子宫内膜异位症的比较

Josep Lluis Carbonell , Ana M. Riverón , Yara Leonard , Jesús González , Braulio Heredia , Carlos Sánchez
{"title":"米非司酮2.5、5、10 mg与安慰剂治疗子宫内膜异位症的比较","authors":"Josep Lluis Carbonell ,&nbsp;Ana M. Riverón ,&nbsp;Yara Leonard ,&nbsp;Jesús González ,&nbsp;Braulio Heredia ,&nbsp;Carlos Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 2.5, 5 and 10<!--> <span><span>mg doses of mifepristone against a placebo in women with laparoscopic diagnostic of </span>endometriosis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 360 subjects randomly assigned to receive orally one daily tablet of 2.5, 5 or 10<!--> <span><span><span>mg mifepristone for 6 month, or 1 daily tablet of mifepristone placebo for 3 months, (90 in each treatment group), carried out at “Eusebio Hernández” Hospital, Havana, Cuba. Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in prevalence of </span>dysmenorrhea<span> and changes in scores according to AFS. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of hot flushes, nausea, dizzy spells, vomiting, fatigue/tiredness, raised hepatic </span></span>transaminases<span>, histological alterations of the endometrium.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the mifepristone groups, the prevalence of symptoms was significantly inferior to those at the beginning of treatment with no significant differences between the groups of 5 and 10<!--> <!-->mg, unlike in 2.5<!--> <!-->mg of mifepristone and the placebo group. The scores of the AFS were significantly different at the end of the treatment in the mifepristone groups. In the mifepristone groups, there were 9/264 (3.4%) subjects with raised hepatic transaminases up to 99<!--> <!-->IU.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mifepristone 5<!--> <!-->mg was safer and more effective than the other mifepristone doses and placebo.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <span>NCT02271958</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.09.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mifepristone 2.5, 5, 10 mg versus placebo in the treatment of endometriosis\",\"authors\":\"Josep Lluis Carbonell ,&nbsp;Ana M. Riverón ,&nbsp;Yara Leonard ,&nbsp;Jesús González ,&nbsp;Braulio Heredia ,&nbsp;Carlos Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 2.5, 5 and 10<!--> <span><span>mg doses of mifepristone against a placebo in women with laparoscopic diagnostic of </span>endometriosis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 360 subjects randomly assigned to receive orally one daily tablet of 2.5, 5 or 10<!--> <span><span><span>mg mifepristone for 6 month, or 1 daily tablet of mifepristone placebo for 3 months, (90 in each treatment group), carried out at “Eusebio Hernández” Hospital, Havana, Cuba. Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in prevalence of </span>dysmenorrhea<span> and changes in scores according to AFS. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of hot flushes, nausea, dizzy spells, vomiting, fatigue/tiredness, raised hepatic </span></span>transaminases<span>, histological alterations of the endometrium.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the mifepristone groups, the prevalence of symptoms was significantly inferior to those at the beginning of treatment with no significant differences between the groups of 5 and 10<!--> <!-->mg, unlike in 2.5<!--> <!-->mg of mifepristone and the placebo group. The scores of the AFS were significantly different at the end of the treatment in the mifepristone groups. In the mifepristone groups, there were 9/264 (3.4%) subjects with raised hepatic transaminases up to 99<!--> <!-->IU.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mifepristone 5<!--> <!-->mg was safer and more effective than the other mifepristone doses and placebo.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <span>NCT02271958</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X1500042X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X1500042X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的评价2.5、5和10mg剂量米非司酮与安慰剂在腹腔镜诊断子宫内膜异位症患者中的有效性和安全性。方法:在古巴哈瓦那“尤西比奥Hernández”医院进行的一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,360名受试者被随机分配,每天口服一片2.5、5或10 mg米非司酮,持续6个月,或每天口服一片米非司酮安慰剂,持续3个月(每个治疗组90人)。通过测量痛经发生率的变化和根据AFS评分的变化来评估疗效。安全性通过潮热、恶心、晕眩、呕吐、疲劳/疲倦、肝转氨酶升高、子宫内膜组织学改变的发生率来评估。结果与2.5 mg米非司酮组和安慰剂组相比,5 mg和10 mg米非司酮组的症状发生率明显低于治疗开始时,差异无统计学意义。米非司酮组治疗结束时AFS评分差异有统计学意义。在米非司酮组中,有9/264(3.4%)的受试者肝转氨酶升高至99 IU。结论米非司酮5mg比其他剂量的米非司酮和安慰剂更安全、更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mifepristone 2.5, 5, 10 mg versus placebo in the treatment of endometriosis

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 2.5, 5 and 10 mg doses of mifepristone against a placebo in women with laparoscopic diagnostic of endometriosis.

Methods

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 360 subjects randomly assigned to receive orally one daily tablet of 2.5, 5 or 10 mg mifepristone for 6 month, or 1 daily tablet of mifepristone placebo for 3 months, (90 in each treatment group), carried out at “Eusebio Hernández” Hospital, Havana, Cuba. Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in prevalence of dysmenorrhea and changes in scores according to AFS. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of hot flushes, nausea, dizzy spells, vomiting, fatigue/tiredness, raised hepatic transaminases, histological alterations of the endometrium.

Results

In the mifepristone groups, the prevalence of symptoms was significantly inferior to those at the beginning of treatment with no significant differences between the groups of 5 and 10 mg, unlike in 2.5 mg of mifepristone and the placebo group. The scores of the AFS were significantly different at the end of the treatment in the mifepristone groups. In the mifepristone groups, there were 9/264 (3.4%) subjects with raised hepatic transaminases up to 99 IU.

Conclusions

Mifepristone 5 mg was safer and more effective than the other mifepristone doses and placebo.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02271958.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信