砂卵石地层中多方案重叠盾构隧道旧建筑响应的调查与测量

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Xue Li , Aopeng Geng
{"title":"砂卵石地层中多方案重叠盾构隧道旧建筑响应的调查与测量","authors":"Xue Li ,&nbsp;Aopeng Geng","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ground movements due to tunneling are becoming increasingly critical as buildings are located around construction sites. This study proposes a new combined reinforcement method using a foundation grouting oblique pipe roof. The former improves the bearing capacity of the subsoil, and the latter blocks the transmission of soil deformation, which weakens the influence of construction during overlapped tunnel under-crossing. Based on this new method, a case study of the shield tunneling response to an old building in Line 6 of China’s Chengdu Metro is presented. Additionally, three-dimensional numerical models without reinforcement, traditional foundation grouting reinforcement, and the new combined reinforcement schemes were compared. The numerical simulation performance was verified using a set of field instrumentation data, which demonstrated that the old building response to the overlapped tunnels was under control, and the maximum deformation, angular distortion, and principal tensile strain of the building were 5.25 mm, 5.10 × 10<sup>–6</sup> rad/m, and 0.0081%, respectively. Compared with the traditional reinforcement scheme, the deformation, angular distortion, and principal tensile strain in the combined reinforcement scheme were reduced by 54.78%, 71.02%, and 70.22%, respectively. These results have important implications for the design and construction of shield tunnels and their response to old buildings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246796742300137X/pdfft?md5=f983377171225afa89ae19b2b7e092c4&pid=1-s2.0-S246796742300137X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation and measurement of old building response to the overlapped shield tunnel of multiple schemes in the sandy cobble stratum\",\"authors\":\"Xue Li ,&nbsp;Aopeng Geng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.08.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ground movements due to tunneling are becoming increasingly critical as buildings are located around construction sites. This study proposes a new combined reinforcement method using a foundation grouting oblique pipe roof. The former improves the bearing capacity of the subsoil, and the latter blocks the transmission of soil deformation, which weakens the influence of construction during overlapped tunnel under-crossing. Based on this new method, a case study of the shield tunneling response to an old building in Line 6 of China’s Chengdu Metro is presented. Additionally, three-dimensional numerical models without reinforcement, traditional foundation grouting reinforcement, and the new combined reinforcement schemes were compared. The numerical simulation performance was verified using a set of field instrumentation data, which demonstrated that the old building response to the overlapped tunnels was under control, and the maximum deformation, angular distortion, and principal tensile strain of the building were 5.25 mm, 5.10 × 10<sup>–6</sup> rad/m, and 0.0081%, respectively. Compared with the traditional reinforcement scheme, the deformation, angular distortion, and principal tensile strain in the combined reinforcement scheme were reduced by 54.78%, 71.02%, and 70.22%, respectively. These results have important implications for the design and construction of shield tunnels and their response to old buildings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Underground Space\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246796742300137X/pdfft?md5=f983377171225afa89ae19b2b7e092c4&pid=1-s2.0-S246796742300137X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Underground Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246796742300137X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246796742300137X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于建筑物位于建筑工地附近,隧道施工引起的地面移动变得越来越严重。提出了一种新的斜管屋面注浆组合加固方法。前者提高了地基承载力,后者阻断了土体变形的传递,减弱了重叠隧道下穿时施工的影响。基于该方法,以成都地铁6号线某老建筑盾构施工响应为例进行了分析。并对不加筋的三维数值模型、传统地基注浆加固方案和新型组合加固方案进行了比较。利用一组现场实测数据验证了数值模拟的性能,结果表明:旧建筑对重叠隧道的响应得到了控制,建筑物的最大变形、角畸变和主拉应变分别为5.25 mm、5.10 × 10-6 rad/m和0.0081%。与传统加固方案相比,组合加固方案的变形量、角变形量和主拉应变分别降低了54.78%、71.02%和70.22%。研究结果对盾构隧道的设计、施工及其对老建筑的响应具有重要的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation and measurement of old building response to the overlapped shield tunnel of multiple schemes in the sandy cobble stratum

Ground movements due to tunneling are becoming increasingly critical as buildings are located around construction sites. This study proposes a new combined reinforcement method using a foundation grouting oblique pipe roof. The former improves the bearing capacity of the subsoil, and the latter blocks the transmission of soil deformation, which weakens the influence of construction during overlapped tunnel under-crossing. Based on this new method, a case study of the shield tunneling response to an old building in Line 6 of China’s Chengdu Metro is presented. Additionally, three-dimensional numerical models without reinforcement, traditional foundation grouting reinforcement, and the new combined reinforcement schemes were compared. The numerical simulation performance was verified using a set of field instrumentation data, which demonstrated that the old building response to the overlapped tunnels was under control, and the maximum deformation, angular distortion, and principal tensile strain of the building were 5.25 mm, 5.10 × 10–6 rad/m, and 0.0081%, respectively. Compared with the traditional reinforcement scheme, the deformation, angular distortion, and principal tensile strain in the combined reinforcement scheme were reduced by 54.78%, 71.02%, and 70.22%, respectively. These results have important implications for the design and construction of shield tunnels and their response to old buildings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信