马利筋?遗传同化作为非迁徙帝王蝶翅形进化的潜在来源。

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Kyra J. A. Nixon, Harald F. Parzer
{"title":"马利筋?遗传同化作为非迁徙帝王蝶翅形进化的潜在来源。","authors":"Kyra J. A. Nixon,&nbsp;Harald F. Parzer","doi":"10.1111/ede.12463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Monarch butterflies (<i>Danaus plexippus</i>) are well studied for their annual long-distance migration from as far north as Canada to their overwintering grounds in Central Mexico. At the end of the cold season, monarchs start to repopulate North America through short-distance migration over the course of multiple generations. Interestingly, some populations in various tropical and subtropical islands do not migrate and exhibit heritable differences in wing shape and size, most likely an adaptation to island life. Less is known about forewing differences between long- and short-distance migrants in relation to island populations. Given their different migratory behaviors, we hypothesized that these differences would be reflected in wing morphology. To test this, we analyzed forewing shape and size of three different groups: nonmigratory, lesser migratory (migrate short-distances), and migratory (migrate long-distances) individuals. Significant differences in shape appear in all groups using geometric morphometrics. As variation found between migratory and lesser migrants has been shown to be caused by phenotypic plasticity, and lesser migrants develop intermediate forewing shapes between migratory and nonmigratory individuals, we suggest that genetic assimilation might be an important mechanism to explain the heritable variation found between migratory and nonmigratory populations. Additionally, our research confirms previous studies which show that forewing size is significantly smaller in nonmigratory populations when compared to both migratory phenotypes. Finally, we found sexual dimorphism in forewing shape in all three groups, but for size in nonmigratory populations only. This might have been caused by reduced constraints on forewing size in nonmigratory populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12083,"journal":{"name":"Evolution & Development","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Got milkweed? Genetic assimilation as potential source for the evolution of nonmigratory monarch butterfly wing shape\",\"authors\":\"Kyra J. A. Nixon,&nbsp;Harald F. Parzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ede.12463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Monarch butterflies (<i>Danaus plexippus</i>) are well studied for their annual long-distance migration from as far north as Canada to their overwintering grounds in Central Mexico. At the end of the cold season, monarchs start to repopulate North America through short-distance migration over the course of multiple generations. Interestingly, some populations in various tropical and subtropical islands do not migrate and exhibit heritable differences in wing shape and size, most likely an adaptation to island life. Less is known about forewing differences between long- and short-distance migrants in relation to island populations. Given their different migratory behaviors, we hypothesized that these differences would be reflected in wing morphology. To test this, we analyzed forewing shape and size of three different groups: nonmigratory, lesser migratory (migrate short-distances), and migratory (migrate long-distances) individuals. Significant differences in shape appear in all groups using geometric morphometrics. As variation found between migratory and lesser migrants has been shown to be caused by phenotypic plasticity, and lesser migrants develop intermediate forewing shapes between migratory and nonmigratory individuals, we suggest that genetic assimilation might be an important mechanism to explain the heritable variation found between migratory and nonmigratory populations. Additionally, our research confirms previous studies which show that forewing size is significantly smaller in nonmigratory populations when compared to both migratory phenotypes. Finally, we found sexual dimorphism in forewing shape in all three groups, but for size in nonmigratory populations only. This might have been caused by reduced constraints on forewing size in nonmigratory populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution & Development\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ede.12463\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution & Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ede.12463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对黑脉金斑蝶(Danaus plexippus)进行了很好的研究,因为它们每年从遥远的加拿大北部长途迁徙到墨西哥中部的越冬地。在寒冷季节结束时,帝王蝶开始通过几代人的短途迁徙重新在北美繁衍。有趣的是,在各种热带和亚热带岛屿上的一些种群不会迁徙,并且在翅膀的形状和大小上表现出遗传差异,这很可能是对岛屿生活的适应。对于与岛屿人口相比,长途和短途移徙者之间的前驱差异所知甚少。鉴于它们不同的迁徙行为,我们假设这些差异将反映在翅膀形态上。为了验证这一点,我们分析了三个不同群体的前翼形状和大小:非迁徙、较小迁徙(短途迁徙)和迁徙(长距离迁徙)个体。使用几何形态计量学,在所有组中都出现了显著的形状差异。由于迁徙种群和非迁徙种群之间的差异是由表型可塑性引起的,而迁徙种群和非迁徙种群之间的前翼形状是由遗传同化引起的,因此我们认为遗传同化可能是解释迁徙种群和非迁徙种群之间遗传差异的重要机制。此外,我们的研究证实了之前的研究表明,与两种迁徙表型相比,非迁徙种群的前翼尺寸明显更小。最后,我们发现在这三个种群中,前翼形状存在性别二态性,但只有在非迁徙种群中,前翼大小存在性别二态性。这可能是由于非迁徙种群对前翅大小的限制减少所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Got milkweed? Genetic assimilation as potential source for the evolution of nonmigratory monarch butterfly wing shape

Got milkweed? Genetic assimilation as potential source for the evolution of nonmigratory monarch butterfly wing shape

Got milkweed? Genetic assimilation as potential source for the evolution of nonmigratory monarch butterfly wing shape

Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) are well studied for their annual long-distance migration from as far north as Canada to their overwintering grounds in Central Mexico. At the end of the cold season, monarchs start to repopulate North America through short-distance migration over the course of multiple generations. Interestingly, some populations in various tropical and subtropical islands do not migrate and exhibit heritable differences in wing shape and size, most likely an adaptation to island life. Less is known about forewing differences between long- and short-distance migrants in relation to island populations. Given their different migratory behaviors, we hypothesized that these differences would be reflected in wing morphology. To test this, we analyzed forewing shape and size of three different groups: nonmigratory, lesser migratory (migrate short-distances), and migratory (migrate long-distances) individuals. Significant differences in shape appear in all groups using geometric morphometrics. As variation found between migratory and lesser migrants has been shown to be caused by phenotypic plasticity, and lesser migrants develop intermediate forewing shapes between migratory and nonmigratory individuals, we suggest that genetic assimilation might be an important mechanism to explain the heritable variation found between migratory and nonmigratory populations. Additionally, our research confirms previous studies which show that forewing size is significantly smaller in nonmigratory populations when compared to both migratory phenotypes. Finally, we found sexual dimorphism in forewing shape in all three groups, but for size in nonmigratory populations only. This might have been caused by reduced constraints on forewing size in nonmigratory populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution & Development
Evolution & Development 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution & Development serves as a voice for the rapidly growing research community at the interface of evolutionary and developmental biology. The exciting re-integration of these two fields, after almost a century''s separation, holds much promise as the focus of a broader synthesis of biological thought. Evolution & Development publishes works that address the evolution/development interface from a diversity of angles. The journal welcomes papers from paleontologists, population biologists, developmental biologists, and molecular biologists, but also encourages submissions from professionals in other fields where relevant research is being carried out, from mathematics to the history and philosophy of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信