2019冠状病毒病大流行与哥斯达黎加的社会政策叙述:一个(稍纵即逝的)机会的故事

IF 0.3 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行与哥斯达黎加的社会政策叙述:一个(稍纵即逝的)机会的故事","authors":"","doi":"10.18356/16840348-2023-139-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Did the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic embolden ideas favourable to inclusive social policy in Latin America? This article addresses that question by examining the emergency cash transfer programme that was implemented in Costa Rica in 2020. Drawing on legislative debates and interviews with senior officials and analysts, the study reveals the fleeting emergence of ideas in favour of expanding non-contributory social protection. The new programme was quickly reined in by a discourse that assimilated fiscal responsibility to cutting social spending rather than expanding revenues. Avoiding simplistic generalizations, the findings invite a contextualized analysis of the impact of the pandemic on specific policy-making processes, and a consideration of the role of ideas in social policy debates. If there is a risk to inclusive social policy, it is the dominant discourse of austerity.","PeriodicalId":46450,"journal":{"name":"Cepal Review","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic and social policy narratives in Costa Rica: the story of a (fleeting) opportunity\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.18356/16840348-2023-139-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Did the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic embolden ideas favourable to inclusive social policy in Latin America? This article addresses that question by examining the emergency cash transfer programme that was implemented in Costa Rica in 2020. Drawing on legislative debates and interviews with senior officials and analysts, the study reveals the fleeting emergence of ideas in favour of expanding non-contributory social protection. The new programme was quickly reined in by a discourse that assimilated fiscal responsibility to cutting social spending rather than expanding revenues. Avoiding simplistic generalizations, the findings invite a contextualized analysis of the impact of the pandemic on specific policy-making processes, and a consideration of the role of ideas in social policy debates. If there is a risk to inclusive social policy, it is the dominant discourse of austerity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cepal Review\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cepal Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18356/16840348-2023-139-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cepal Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18356/16840348-2023-139-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行是否助长了有利于拉丁美洲包容性社会政策的想法?本文通过审查哥斯达黎加于2020年实施的紧急现金转移支付方案来解决这一问题。根据立法辩论和对高级官员和分析人士的采访,这项研究揭示了支持扩大非缴费型社会保障的想法正在迅速出现。这项新计划很快就被一种言论所遏制,这种言论将财政责任等同于削减社会支出,而不是扩大收入。为了避免简单化的概括,调查结果要求结合具体情况分析该流行病对具体决策进程的影响,并审议各种思想在社会政策辩论中的作用。如果说包容性社会政策存在风险,那就是紧缩的主流话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The COVID-19 pandemic and social policy narratives in Costa Rica: the story of a (fleeting) opportunity
Did the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic embolden ideas favourable to inclusive social policy in Latin America? This article addresses that question by examining the emergency cash transfer programme that was implemented in Costa Rica in 2020. Drawing on legislative debates and interviews with senior officials and analysts, the study reveals the fleeting emergence of ideas in favour of expanding non-contributory social protection. The new programme was quickly reined in by a discourse that assimilated fiscal responsibility to cutting social spending rather than expanding revenues. Avoiding simplistic generalizations, the findings invite a contextualized analysis of the impact of the pandemic on specific policy-making processes, and a consideration of the role of ideas in social policy debates. If there is a risk to inclusive social policy, it is the dominant discourse of austerity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cepal Review
Cepal Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信