在根特的亨利和约翰·邓斯·斯科托之间的形而上学辩论中,虚构实体的一些用途

Jacopo Francesco Falà
{"title":"在根特的亨利和约翰·邓斯·斯科托之间的形而上学辩论中,虚构实体的一些用途","authors":"Jacopo Francesco Falà","doi":"10.21747/21836884/med40a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate between Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus about the status of fictional beings has profound repercussions on the overall elaboration of the two thinkers’ metaphysical theories. Diffe-rent conceptions related to entities such as ‘chimera’ or ‘hircocervus’ are related to more general and different descriptions of creatural essences, and to the dynamics of the divine knowledge of these same essences, involving the determination of speculative concepts such as ratitudo, aliquitas and res a reor reris. This contribution takes into consideration the doctrines on the subject of these two authors, both readers of Avicenna, and the question 17 of the Collationes oxonienses, where a Fran-ciscan influenced by Henry of Ghent and Scotus (or one of his follower) discuss on fictional beings. A new interpretation of the collatio is given, not entirely coinciding with those found in secondary literature.","PeriodicalId":497912,"journal":{"name":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alcuni utilizzi degli enti finzionali nel dibattito metafisico tra Enrico di Gand e Giovanni Duns Scoto\",\"authors\":\"Jacopo Francesco Falà\",\"doi\":\"10.21747/21836884/med40a6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The debate between Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus about the status of fictional beings has profound repercussions on the overall elaboration of the two thinkers’ metaphysical theories. Diffe-rent conceptions related to entities such as ‘chimera’ or ‘hircocervus’ are related to more general and different descriptions of creatural essences, and to the dynamics of the divine knowledge of these same essences, involving the determination of speculative concepts such as ratitudo, aliquitas and res a reor reris. This contribution takes into consideration the doctrines on the subject of these two authors, both readers of Avicenna, and the question 17 of the Collationes oxonienses, where a Fran-ciscan influenced by Henry of Ghent and Scotus (or one of his follower) discuss on fictional beings. A new interpretation of the collatio is given, not entirely coinciding with those found in secondary literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":497912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med40a6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med40a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根特的亨利和约翰·邓斯·司各脱关于虚构人物地位的争论对两位思想家的形而上学理论的整体阐述产生了深远的影响。与实体相关的不同概念,如“chimera”或“hircocervus”,与更一般和不同的生物本质描述有关,与这些相同本质的神性知识的动态有关,涉及到诸如比率(ratitudo)、流动性(aliquitas)和复归性(res a reor reris)等思辨性概念的确定。这一贡献考虑到这两位作者的教义,他们都是阿维森纳的读者,以及Collationes oxonienses的问题17,其中受根特的亨利和斯科特(或他的追随者之一)影响的方济各会士讨论了虚构的存在。一个新的解释的校勘给出,不完全符合那些发现在二手文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alcuni utilizzi degli enti finzionali nel dibattito metafisico tra Enrico di Gand e Giovanni Duns Scoto
The debate between Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus about the status of fictional beings has profound repercussions on the overall elaboration of the two thinkers’ metaphysical theories. Diffe-rent conceptions related to entities such as ‘chimera’ or ‘hircocervus’ are related to more general and different descriptions of creatural essences, and to the dynamics of the divine knowledge of these same essences, involving the determination of speculative concepts such as ratitudo, aliquitas and res a reor reris. This contribution takes into consideration the doctrines on the subject of these two authors, both readers of Avicenna, and the question 17 of the Collationes oxonienses, where a Fran-ciscan influenced by Henry of Ghent and Scotus (or one of his follower) discuss on fictional beings. A new interpretation of the collatio is given, not entirely coinciding with those found in secondary literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信