苏联试图在全球范围内取代西方

Tatyana I. Shcherbakova
{"title":"苏联试图在全球范围内取代西方","authors":"Tatyana I. Shcherbakova","doi":"10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.163-171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The Soviet Union, created as a socialist alternative to the capitalist world, did not have the opportunity to implement a socialist global project before World War II. The decisive contribution of the USSR to the victory over fascism forced the West to recognize for the USSR the right to a sphere of influence. The USSR and the countries of Eastern Europe, within the framework of CMEA, drew up a socialist integration project The purpose of this article is to consider the prospects for the transformation of CMEA from a local socialist project into a mechanism of foreign economic activity, alternative to the Bretton Woods system. Materials and Methods. The article analyzes the conditions for formalizing a socialist integration project. Methods of interaction between socialist countries and their results are considered. The nature of the impact on the CMEA countries of the world situation is assessed. The article is based on published documents and Soviet papers, characterizing the directions and results of socialist cooperation. Results. The CMEA had no prospects to be an alternative to the Bretton Woods system. It was developed through the consumption of Soviet resources provided at prices much lower than the world ones. As CMEA members increased, this led to a senseless depletion of the USSR’s resources, while moving it into the paradigm of the resource-producing economy. Discussion and Conclusion. In the CMEA the USSR being a donor for the countries of Eastern Europe, limited their sovereignty. Such a model of economic relations had no prospects and needed a serious adjustment. The USSR could not count on victory in the global confrontation with the West, without having a universally acceptable model of international economic relations.","PeriodicalId":494773,"journal":{"name":"Гуманитарий","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The USSR as an Attempt to Implement a Global Alternative to the West\",\"authors\":\"Tatyana I. Shcherbakova\",\"doi\":\"10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.163-171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The Soviet Union, created as a socialist alternative to the capitalist world, did not have the opportunity to implement a socialist global project before World War II. The decisive contribution of the USSR to the victory over fascism forced the West to recognize for the USSR the right to a sphere of influence. The USSR and the countries of Eastern Europe, within the framework of CMEA, drew up a socialist integration project The purpose of this article is to consider the prospects for the transformation of CMEA from a local socialist project into a mechanism of foreign economic activity, alternative to the Bretton Woods system. Materials and Methods. The article analyzes the conditions for formalizing a socialist integration project. Methods of interaction between socialist countries and their results are considered. The nature of the impact on the CMEA countries of the world situation is assessed. The article is based on published documents and Soviet papers, characterizing the directions and results of socialist cooperation. Results. The CMEA had no prospects to be an alternative to the Bretton Woods system. It was developed through the consumption of Soviet resources provided at prices much lower than the world ones. As CMEA members increased, this led to a senseless depletion of the USSR’s resources, while moving it into the paradigm of the resource-producing economy. Discussion and Conclusion. In the CMEA the USSR being a donor for the countries of Eastern Europe, limited their sovereignty. Such a model of economic relations had no prospects and needed a serious adjustment. The USSR could not count on victory in the global confrontation with the West, without having a universally acceptable model of international economic relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":494773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Гуманитарий\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Гуманитарий\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.163-171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Гуманитарий","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.163-171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。苏联,作为资本主义世界的社会主义替代品,在第二次世界大战之前没有机会实施社会主义的全球计划。苏联对战胜法西斯主义的决定性贡献迫使西方承认苏联拥有势力范围的权利。苏联和东欧国家在CMEA框架内制定了一项社会主义一体化项目,本文的目的是考虑CMEA从当地社会主义项目转变为替代布雷顿森林体系的对外经济活动机制的前景。材料与方法。文章分析了形成社会主义一体化工程的条件。考虑了社会主义国家之间相互作用的方法及其结果。评估了世界局势对经互会国家影响的性质。这篇文章是根据发表的文件和苏联的论文,描述了社会主义合作的方向和结果。结果。经社理事会不可能成为布雷顿森林体系的替代办法。它是通过消耗价格远低于世界价格的苏联资源而发展起来的。随着CMEA成员国的增加,这导致了苏联资源的无谓消耗,同时使其进入了资源生产型经济的范式。讨论与结论。在经互会中,苏联作为东欧国家的捐助国,限制了它们的主权。这种经济关系模式没有前景,需要进行重大调整。如果没有一个被普遍接受的国际经济关系模式,苏联就不能指望在与西方的全球对抗中取得胜利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The USSR as an Attempt to Implement a Global Alternative to the West
Introduction. The Soviet Union, created as a socialist alternative to the capitalist world, did not have the opportunity to implement a socialist global project before World War II. The decisive contribution of the USSR to the victory over fascism forced the West to recognize for the USSR the right to a sphere of influence. The USSR and the countries of Eastern Europe, within the framework of CMEA, drew up a socialist integration project The purpose of this article is to consider the prospects for the transformation of CMEA from a local socialist project into a mechanism of foreign economic activity, alternative to the Bretton Woods system. Materials and Methods. The article analyzes the conditions for formalizing a socialist integration project. Methods of interaction between socialist countries and their results are considered. The nature of the impact on the CMEA countries of the world situation is assessed. The article is based on published documents and Soviet papers, characterizing the directions and results of socialist cooperation. Results. The CMEA had no prospects to be an alternative to the Bretton Woods system. It was developed through the consumption of Soviet resources provided at prices much lower than the world ones. As CMEA members increased, this led to a senseless depletion of the USSR’s resources, while moving it into the paradigm of the resource-producing economy. Discussion and Conclusion. In the CMEA the USSR being a donor for the countries of Eastern Europe, limited their sovereignty. Such a model of economic relations had no prospects and needed a serious adjustment. The USSR could not count on victory in the global confrontation with the West, without having a universally acceptable model of international economic relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信