“让非数学家的人不要读我”(达·芬奇作品中的自然科学观)

Aleksey I. Belkin, Zhanna V. Chashina
{"title":"“让非数学家的人不要读我”(达·芬奇作品中的自然科学观)","authors":"Aleksey I. Belkin, Zhanna V. Chashina","doi":"10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.195-208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. It is noted the originality of Leonardo da Vinci’s natural-scientific views in the context of the Renaissance. The objectives of the article are outlined: the systematization of Leonardo’s natural-scientific views, the identification of methods used by him to cognize the reality, the analysis of the set of social conditions that influenced the formation of the thinker’s views. It is also indicated the relevance of the researched argument; the object and subject of the study are determined. Materials and Methods. It is indicated that the main source used in the article are the notes of Leonardo, reflecting his ideas about nature. The methods used in the study are related to the specifics of this source: a concrete historical approach, a comparative historical method, logical and textual methods. Results. The circumstances that gave rise to an interest in natural-scientific problems are indicated – painting and its interpretation as a reflection of the real world, on the one hand; good mathematical training received by Leonardo in his youth, on the other. It is proved, using primary sources, that Leonardo da Vinci considered experience to be the main method of cognition, and the ultimate goal of cognitive activity was the practical application of knowledge. The peculiarity of the humanistic orientation of Leonardo’s thought is revealed. On the basis of primary sources, the thinker’s ideas about nature, human, and the purpose of science are revealed. It is shown how Christian ideas and the humanistic Renaissance view were combined in a peculiar way in the views of the thinker. Attention is drawn to the inconsistency of Leonardo da Vinci’s relationship with Christianity. Discussion and Conclusion. It is shown the significance of Leonardo’s philosophical views, his role in the history of philosophy as a predecessor of the empiricist philosophers of Modern Time. It is noted that the comprehensive activity of the thinker, in fact, embodied the ideal of a person, great creative opportunities that feed, firstly, the desire to fully know the world and, secondly, the awareness of the usefulness of their activities for others. It is noted that the cultivation of these motivations has a huge educational potential in our time.","PeriodicalId":494773,"journal":{"name":"Гуманитарий","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Let Someone Who is Not a Mathematician Not Read Me” (Natural-Scientific Views in the Works of Leonardo da Vinci)\",\"authors\":\"Aleksey I. Belkin, Zhanna V. Chashina\",\"doi\":\"10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.195-208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. It is noted the originality of Leonardo da Vinci’s natural-scientific views in the context of the Renaissance. The objectives of the article are outlined: the systematization of Leonardo’s natural-scientific views, the identification of methods used by him to cognize the reality, the analysis of the set of social conditions that influenced the formation of the thinker’s views. It is also indicated the relevance of the researched argument; the object and subject of the study are determined. Materials and Methods. It is indicated that the main source used in the article are the notes of Leonardo, reflecting his ideas about nature. The methods used in the study are related to the specifics of this source: a concrete historical approach, a comparative historical method, logical and textual methods. Results. The circumstances that gave rise to an interest in natural-scientific problems are indicated – painting and its interpretation as a reflection of the real world, on the one hand; good mathematical training received by Leonardo in his youth, on the other. It is proved, using primary sources, that Leonardo da Vinci considered experience to be the main method of cognition, and the ultimate goal of cognitive activity was the practical application of knowledge. The peculiarity of the humanistic orientation of Leonardo’s thought is revealed. On the basis of primary sources, the thinker’s ideas about nature, human, and the purpose of science are revealed. It is shown how Christian ideas and the humanistic Renaissance view were combined in a peculiar way in the views of the thinker. Attention is drawn to the inconsistency of Leonardo da Vinci’s relationship with Christianity. Discussion and Conclusion. It is shown the significance of Leonardo’s philosophical views, his role in the history of philosophy as a predecessor of the empiricist philosophers of Modern Time. It is noted that the comprehensive activity of the thinker, in fact, embodied the ideal of a person, great creative opportunities that feed, firstly, the desire to fully know the world and, secondly, the awareness of the usefulness of their activities for others. It is noted that the cultivation of these motivations has a huge educational potential in our time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":494773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Гуманитарий\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Гуманитарий\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.195-208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Гуманитарий","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.062.023.202302.195-208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。人们注意到,在文艺复兴时期,列奥纳多·达·芬奇的自然科学观点具有独创性。本文的目标是:系统化列奥纳多的自然科学观点,识别他用来认识现实的方法,分析影响思想家观点形成的一系列社会条件。还指出了所研究论点的相关性;确定了研究的对象和主体。材料与方法。文章的主要来源是列奥纳多的笔记,反映了他对自然的看法。研究中使用的方法与这一来源的具体情况有关:具体历史方法、比较历史方法、逻辑和文本方法。结果。书中指出了引起人们对自然科学问题感兴趣的环境——一方面,绘画及其解释是对现实世界的反映;另一方面,列奥纳多年轻时接受过良好的数学训练。根据原始资料证明,达芬奇认为经验是认知的主要方法,认知活动的最终目的是知识的实际应用。揭示了列奥纳多思想人文取向的独特性。在原始资料的基础上,揭示了思想家关于自然、人类和科学目的的思想。它展示了基督教思想和人文主义文艺复兴的观点是如何在思想家的观点中以一种独特的方式结合在一起的。人们注意到列奥纳多·达·芬奇与基督教的关系不一致。讨论与结论。它显示了列奥纳多的哲学观点的重要性,他在哲学史上的作用,作为现代经验主义哲学家的前身。值得注意的是,思考者的全面活动实际上体现了一个人的理想,它提供了巨大的创造机会,首先满足了充分了解世界的愿望,其次满足了意识到自己的活动对他人的有用性。值得注意的是,这些动机的培养在我们这个时代具有巨大的教育潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Let Someone Who is Not a Mathematician Not Read Me” (Natural-Scientific Views in the Works of Leonardo da Vinci)
Introduction. It is noted the originality of Leonardo da Vinci’s natural-scientific views in the context of the Renaissance. The objectives of the article are outlined: the systematization of Leonardo’s natural-scientific views, the identification of methods used by him to cognize the reality, the analysis of the set of social conditions that influenced the formation of the thinker’s views. It is also indicated the relevance of the researched argument; the object and subject of the study are determined. Materials and Methods. It is indicated that the main source used in the article are the notes of Leonardo, reflecting his ideas about nature. The methods used in the study are related to the specifics of this source: a concrete historical approach, a comparative historical method, logical and textual methods. Results. The circumstances that gave rise to an interest in natural-scientific problems are indicated – painting and its interpretation as a reflection of the real world, on the one hand; good mathematical training received by Leonardo in his youth, on the other. It is proved, using primary sources, that Leonardo da Vinci considered experience to be the main method of cognition, and the ultimate goal of cognitive activity was the practical application of knowledge. The peculiarity of the humanistic orientation of Leonardo’s thought is revealed. On the basis of primary sources, the thinker’s ideas about nature, human, and the purpose of science are revealed. It is shown how Christian ideas and the humanistic Renaissance view were combined in a peculiar way in the views of the thinker. Attention is drawn to the inconsistency of Leonardo da Vinci’s relationship with Christianity. Discussion and Conclusion. It is shown the significance of Leonardo’s philosophical views, his role in the history of philosophy as a predecessor of the empiricist philosophers of Modern Time. It is noted that the comprehensive activity of the thinker, in fact, embodied the ideal of a person, great creative opportunities that feed, firstly, the desire to fully know the world and, secondly, the awareness of the usefulness of their activities for others. It is noted that the cultivation of these motivations has a huge educational potential in our time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信