应用人工智能技术对COVID-19临床研究现状的注册审计:系统综述

Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, sree sudha ty, Hemasri Velmurugan, Eswaran Thangaraju, Kaumudi Chirumamilla, Tulika Chakrabarti, Prasun Chakrabarti
{"title":"应用人工智能技术对COVID-19临床研究现状的注册审计:系统综述","authors":"Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, sree sudha ty, Hemasri Velmurugan, Eswaran Thangaraju, Kaumudi Chirumamilla, Tulika Chakrabarti, Prasun Chakrabarti","doi":"10.2174/2666796704666230908124854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The term artificial intelligence refers to the use of computers and technology to replicate intelligent behaviour and critical thinking similar to that of a human being. In COVID-19, artificial intelligence has been widely applied in diagnostics, public health, clinical decision-making, social control, treatments, vaccine development, monitoring, integration with big data, operation of additional vital clinical services, and patient management. Hence, we conceptualized this study to evaluate the usage of artificial intelligence as a tool at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: From December, 2019, to May, 2022, all clinical trials using AI approaches listed on clinicaltrials.gov and ctri.gov.in were examined and analysed. Results: Out of 8072 studies on COVID-19 listed on ClinicalTrials.gov and 674 studies on the CTRI website, 53 studies were related to AI. Ten (18.9%) of the 53 studies were interventional, while the remaining 43 (81.1%) were observational. Conclusion: With limited medical resources and growing healthcare strain, the introduction of AI approaches will increase human efficiency and capacity to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. In this review, artificial intelligence was proven to be more accurate than human specialists in COVID-19 diagnosis and medication discovery.","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Registry-based Audit of a Current Situation of Clinical Research in COVID-19 Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, sree sudha ty, Hemasri Velmurugan, Eswaran Thangaraju, Kaumudi Chirumamilla, Tulika Chakrabarti, Prasun Chakrabarti\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2666796704666230908124854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The term artificial intelligence refers to the use of computers and technology to replicate intelligent behaviour and critical thinking similar to that of a human being. In COVID-19, artificial intelligence has been widely applied in diagnostics, public health, clinical decision-making, social control, treatments, vaccine development, monitoring, integration with big data, operation of additional vital clinical services, and patient management. Hence, we conceptualized this study to evaluate the usage of artificial intelligence as a tool at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: From December, 2019, to May, 2022, all clinical trials using AI approaches listed on clinicaltrials.gov and ctri.gov.in were examined and analysed. Results: Out of 8072 studies on COVID-19 listed on ClinicalTrials.gov and 674 studies on the CTRI website, 53 studies were related to AI. Ten (18.9%) of the 53 studies were interventional, while the remaining 43 (81.1%) were observational. Conclusion: With limited medical resources and growing healthcare strain, the introduction of AI approaches will increase human efficiency and capacity to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. In this review, artificial intelligence was proven to be more accurate than human specialists in COVID-19 diagnosis and medication discovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666796704666230908124854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666796704666230908124854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能是指使用计算机和技术来复制类似于人类的智能行为和批判性思维。新冠肺炎疫情期间,人工智能在诊断、公共卫生、临床决策、社会控制、治疗、疫苗研制、监测、大数据融合、附加临床关键服务运营、患者管理等领域得到广泛应用。因此,我们将这项研究概念化,以评估在COVID-19大流行期间人工智能作为工具的使用情况。方法:对2019年12月至2022年5月clinicaltrials.gov和cri .gov.in网站上列出的所有采用人工智能方法的临床试验进行统计分析。结果:在ClinicalTrials.gov上列出的8072项关于COVID-19的研究和CTRI网站上列出的674项研究中,53项研究与AI相关。53项研究中有10项(18.9%)为干预性研究,其余43项(81.1%)为观察性研究。结论:在医疗资源有限、医疗压力日益增大的情况下,人工智能方法的引入将提高人类应对COVID-19大流行的效率和能力。在这篇综述中,人工智能被证明在COVID-19诊断和药物发现方面比人类专家更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Registry-based Audit of a Current Situation of Clinical Research in COVID-19 Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Systematic Review
Background: The term artificial intelligence refers to the use of computers and technology to replicate intelligent behaviour and critical thinking similar to that of a human being. In COVID-19, artificial intelligence has been widely applied in diagnostics, public health, clinical decision-making, social control, treatments, vaccine development, monitoring, integration with big data, operation of additional vital clinical services, and patient management. Hence, we conceptualized this study to evaluate the usage of artificial intelligence as a tool at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: From December, 2019, to May, 2022, all clinical trials using AI approaches listed on clinicaltrials.gov and ctri.gov.in were examined and analysed. Results: Out of 8072 studies on COVID-19 listed on ClinicalTrials.gov and 674 studies on the CTRI website, 53 studies were related to AI. Ten (18.9%) of the 53 studies were interventional, while the remaining 43 (81.1%) were observational. Conclusion: With limited medical resources and growing healthcare strain, the introduction of AI approaches will increase human efficiency and capacity to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. In this review, artificial intelligence was proven to be more accurate than human specialists in COVID-19 diagnosis and medication discovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信