间隔练习在不同的第二语言词汇学习活动中是否有相同的效果?填空vs抽认卡

IF 4.7 1区文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Modern Language Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1111/modl.12879

Su Kyung Kim, Stuart Webb

{"title":"间隔练习在不同的第二语言词汇学习活动中是否有相同的效果?填空vs抽认卡","authors":"Su Kyung Kim, Stuart Webb","doi":"10.1111/modl.12879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined the effects of spaced practice on second language (L2) vocabulary learning under different learning conditions. One hundred fifty Korean learners of L2 English were divided into five groups: one control (no treatment) and four experimental groups based on learning condition (fill‐in‐the‐blanks vs. flashcards) and spacing type (massed [no spacing interval] vs. spaced [1‐day interval]). The participants studied 48 low‐frequency English words. Results showed that the effects of spaced practice were greater for fill‐in‐the‐blanks than flashcards on an immediate posttest and that spaced practice was more effective than massed practice for both activities on a 2‐week delayed posttest with no overall significant difference between the learning gains from the two activities. Feedback timing (immediate, delayed) did not affect vocabulary learning in either activity.","PeriodicalId":48249,"journal":{"name":"Modern Language Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does spaced practice have the same effects on different second language vocabulary learning activities? Fill‐in‐the‐blanks versus flashcards\",\"authors\":\"Su Kyung Kim, Stuart Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/modl.12879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study examined the effects of spaced practice on second language (L2) vocabulary learning under different learning conditions. One hundred fifty Korean learners of L2 English were divided into five groups: one control (no treatment) and four experimental groups based on learning condition (fill‐in‐the‐blanks vs. flashcards) and spacing type (massed [no spacing interval] vs. spaced [1‐day interval]). The participants studied 48 low‐frequency English words. Results showed that the effects of spaced practice were greater for fill‐in‐the‐blanks than flashcards on an immediate posttest and that spaced practice was more effective than massed practice for both activities on a 2‐week delayed posttest with no overall significant difference between the learning gains from the two activities. Feedback timing (immediate, delayed) did not affect vocabulary learning in either activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Language Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Language Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12879\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究考察了在不同学习条件下，间隔练习对第二语言词汇学习的影响。150名韩国第二语言英语学习者根据学习条件(填空vs抽认卡)和间隔类型(集中[无间隔]vs间隔[1天间隔])被分为五组:一个对照组(没有治疗)和四个实验组。参与者学习了48个低频英语单词。结果表明，在即时后测中，间隔练习对填空比抽认卡的效果更大，在两周后测中，间隔练习比大量练习更有效，两种活动的学习收益总体上没有显著差异。反馈时间(即时的，延迟的)在两种活动中都不影响词汇学习。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does spaced practice have the same effects on different second language vocabulary learning activities? Fill‐in‐the‐blanks versus flashcards

Abstract This study examined the effects of spaced practice on second language (L2) vocabulary learning under different learning conditions. One hundred fifty Korean learners of L2 English were divided into five groups: one control (no treatment) and four experimental groups based on learning condition (fill‐in‐the‐blanks vs. flashcards) and spacing type (massed [no spacing interval] vs. spaced [1‐day interval]). The participants studied 48 low‐frequency English words. Results showed that the effects of spaced practice were greater for fill‐in‐the‐blanks than flashcards on an immediate posttest and that spaced practice was more effective than massed practice for both activities on a 2‐week delayed posttest with no overall significant difference between the learning gains from the two activities. Feedback timing (immediate, delayed) did not affect vocabulary learning in either activity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Modern Language Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

4.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： A refereed publication, The Modern Language Journal is dedicated to promoting scholarly exchange among teachers and researchers of all modern foreign languages and English as a second language. This journal publishes documented essays, quantitative and qualitative research studies, response articles, and editorials that challenge paradigms of language learning and teaching. The Modern Language Journal offers a professional calendar of events and news, a listing of relevant articles in other journals, an annual survey of doctoral degrees in all areas concerning foreign and second languages, and reviews of scholarly books, textbooks, videotapes, and software.