有限元分析(FEA)和断口学:了解导致导联芯片(COL)器件发际裂纹因素的互补方法

Melanie Cajita, Renald Dechino, Marionne Javien, Nico Deus Villafranca
{"title":"有限元分析(FEA)和断口学:了解导致导联芯片(COL)器件发际裂纹因素的互补方法","authors":"Melanie Cajita, Renald Dechino, Marionne Javien, Nico Deus Villafranca","doi":"10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2023p0459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Several failures in Chip-On-Lead (COL) package from the customer were returned for Failure Analysis (FA). Containment activities were able to find similar failures. The connectivity of the silicon die to the leads uses gold wire. The die is in live bug position with respect to the package and is being held in place using non-conductive die attach epoxy. The identification of the Failure Mechanism (FMECH) utilized analysis flow involving non-destructive and destructive FA techniques. A hairline crack was found on the die between the two (2) corner pins. Based on lot history reviews, hairline die crack had a very low detectability at electrical test. Further collaboration with the process owners showed the need to identify the crack initiation, propagation and the factors that could result to this FMECH. Analysis of fracture or fractography was utilized in identifying the crack initiation point and propagation. Due to low detectability, identifying the factors resulting to die crack would require several evaluations and process mappings. Finite element analysis (FEA) was utilized to create models and simulation to identify factors that would result to highly stressed area identified through fractography. These additional data for the hairline crack were vital on the identification of root cause and formulation of corrective/preventive actions.","PeriodicalId":20443,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Fractography : Complementary Methods in Understanding the Factors Resulting to Hairline Die Crack on Chip-On-Lead (COL) Devices\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Cajita, Renald Dechino, Marionne Javien, Nico Deus Villafranca\",\"doi\":\"10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2023p0459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Several failures in Chip-On-Lead (COL) package from the customer were returned for Failure Analysis (FA). Containment activities were able to find similar failures. The connectivity of the silicon die to the leads uses gold wire. The die is in live bug position with respect to the package and is being held in place using non-conductive die attach epoxy. The identification of the Failure Mechanism (FMECH) utilized analysis flow involving non-destructive and destructive FA techniques. A hairline crack was found on the die between the two (2) corner pins. Based on lot history reviews, hairline die crack had a very low detectability at electrical test. Further collaboration with the process owners showed the need to identify the crack initiation, propagation and the factors that could result to this FMECH. Analysis of fracture or fractography was utilized in identifying the crack initiation point and propagation. Due to low detectability, identifying the factors resulting to die crack would require several evaluations and process mappings. Finite element analysis (FEA) was utilized to create models and simulation to identify factors that would result to highly stressed area identified through fractography. These additional data for the hairline crack were vital on the identification of root cause and formulation of corrective/preventive actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2023p0459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2023p0459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要客户退回了几例导联芯片(COL)封装的故障进行故障分析(FA)。遏制活动能够发现类似的故障。硅芯片与引线的连接使用金线。模具相对于封装处于活bug位置,并且使用不导电的模具附着环氧树脂保持在适当位置。失效机理(FMECH)的识别利用了包括非破坏性和破坏性FA技术的分析流程。在两(2)角销之间的模具上发现了细微的裂纹。根据批次历史回顾,发际裂纹在电气测试中的检出率很低。与工艺所有者的进一步合作表明,需要确定裂纹的起裂、扩展以及可能导致该FMECH的因素。利用断口分析或断口学来确定裂纹的起裂点和扩展。由于可检测性较低,确定导致模具裂纹的因素需要多次评估和工艺映射。利用有限元分析(FEA)建立模型并进行仿真,以确定导致断口识别的高应力区域的因素。这些额外的数据对于确定根本原因和制定纠正/预防措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Fractography : Complementary Methods in Understanding the Factors Resulting to Hairline Die Crack on Chip-On-Lead (COL) Devices
Abstract Several failures in Chip-On-Lead (COL) package from the customer were returned for Failure Analysis (FA). Containment activities were able to find similar failures. The connectivity of the silicon die to the leads uses gold wire. The die is in live bug position with respect to the package and is being held in place using non-conductive die attach epoxy. The identification of the Failure Mechanism (FMECH) utilized analysis flow involving non-destructive and destructive FA techniques. A hairline crack was found on the die between the two (2) corner pins. Based on lot history reviews, hairline die crack had a very low detectability at electrical test. Further collaboration with the process owners showed the need to identify the crack initiation, propagation and the factors that could result to this FMECH. Analysis of fracture or fractography was utilized in identifying the crack initiation point and propagation. Due to low detectability, identifying the factors resulting to die crack would require several evaluations and process mappings. Finite element analysis (FEA) was utilized to create models and simulation to identify factors that would result to highly stressed area identified through fractography. These additional data for the hairline crack were vital on the identification of root cause and formulation of corrective/preventive actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信