在网上产品展示的背景下,顾客对中小企业零售商和零售连锁店的能力评价是否不同?

IF 5.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Theresia Mennekes, Tobias Röding, Gerhard Wagner, Hanna Schramm-Klein
{"title":"在网上产品展示的背景下,顾客对中小企业零售商和零售连锁店的能力评价是否不同?","authors":"Theresia Mennekes, Tobias Röding, Gerhard Wagner, Hanna Schramm-Klein","doi":"10.1108/ijrdm-10-2022-0419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which customers evaluate inferior product presentations on a local shopping platform based on the retailer (small and medium-sized enterprise [SME] vs retail chain). Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a between-subject online study ( N = 728) with a 2 (SME vs retail chain) x 2 (high vs low-quality product presentation) between-subject experimental design. The authors conducted several analyses of variance to analyze the hypotheses and analyses of covariance for a mediating effect. Findings This study's results show that customers tend to overlook inaccuracies from a retail chain more often than they overlook inaccuracies from SME retailers. The authors show that the perceived competence of the retailer mediates the impact of the retailer's quality on customer purchasing intentions, not only for the presented product but also for the retailer itself. Practical implications Based on this study's results, the authors give implications for retailer cross-channel strategies and hint at the importance of emphasizing the retail size. Originality/value This paper provides important contributions to the literature on resource-advantage theory by explaining that consumers perceive quality differences within product presentations on online shopping platforms differently with regard to retail chains vs SME retailers. Moreover, the information processing theory helps to provide a theoretical foundation concerning differences in online store quality (via engineered low- vs high-quality product presentations in this study).","PeriodicalId":51402,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do customers evaluate the competence of SME retailers and retail chains differently in the context of online product presentations?\",\"authors\":\"Theresia Mennekes, Tobias Röding, Gerhard Wagner, Hanna Schramm-Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijrdm-10-2022-0419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which customers evaluate inferior product presentations on a local shopping platform based on the retailer (small and medium-sized enterprise [SME] vs retail chain). Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a between-subject online study ( N = 728) with a 2 (SME vs retail chain) x 2 (high vs low-quality product presentation) between-subject experimental design. The authors conducted several analyses of variance to analyze the hypotheses and analyses of covariance for a mediating effect. Findings This study's results show that customers tend to overlook inaccuracies from a retail chain more often than they overlook inaccuracies from SME retailers. The authors show that the perceived competence of the retailer mediates the impact of the retailer's quality on customer purchasing intentions, not only for the presented product but also for the retailer itself. Practical implications Based on this study's results, the authors give implications for retailer cross-channel strategies and hint at the importance of emphasizing the retail size. Originality/value This paper provides important contributions to the literature on resource-advantage theory by explaining that consumers perceive quality differences within product presentations on online shopping platforms differently with regard to retail chains vs SME retailers. Moreover, the information processing theory helps to provide a theoretical foundation concerning differences in online store quality (via engineered low- vs high-quality product presentations in this study).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-10-2022-0419\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-10-2022-0419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是探讨消费者在基于零售商(中小企业与零售连锁店)的本地购物平台上评估劣质产品展示的程度。设计/方法/方法作者进行了一项受试者间在线研究(N = 728),采用2(中小企业与零售连锁店)× 2(高质量与低质量产品展示)受试者间实验设计。作者对假设进行了方差分析,并对中介效应进行了协方差分析。本研究的结果表明,与中小企业零售商的不准确性相比,消费者往往更容易忽视零售连锁店的不准确性。作者表明,零售商的感知能力介导了零售商质量对顾客购买意愿的影响,不仅是对所呈现的产品,而且对零售商本身。基于本研究的结果,作者给出了零售商跨渠道战略的启示,并暗示了重视零售规模的重要性。本文对资源优势理论的文献做出了重要贡献,解释了消费者对零售连锁店与中小企业零售商在网上购物平台上产品展示中的质量差异的感知不同。此外,信息处理理论有助于提供关于网上商店质量差异的理论基础(通过本研究中设计的低质量和高质量产品展示)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do customers evaluate the competence of SME retailers and retail chains differently in the context of online product presentations?
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which customers evaluate inferior product presentations on a local shopping platform based on the retailer (small and medium-sized enterprise [SME] vs retail chain). Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a between-subject online study ( N = 728) with a 2 (SME vs retail chain) x 2 (high vs low-quality product presentation) between-subject experimental design. The authors conducted several analyses of variance to analyze the hypotheses and analyses of covariance for a mediating effect. Findings This study's results show that customers tend to overlook inaccuracies from a retail chain more often than they overlook inaccuracies from SME retailers. The authors show that the perceived competence of the retailer mediates the impact of the retailer's quality on customer purchasing intentions, not only for the presented product but also for the retailer itself. Practical implications Based on this study's results, the authors give implications for retailer cross-channel strategies and hint at the importance of emphasizing the retail size. Originality/value This paper provides important contributions to the literature on resource-advantage theory by explaining that consumers perceive quality differences within product presentations on online shopping platforms differently with regard to retail chains vs SME retailers. Moreover, the information processing theory helps to provide a theoretical foundation concerning differences in online store quality (via engineered low- vs high-quality product presentations in this study).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The competitive retail sector is under pressure to provide efficient services to hold its share of the market. As consumers demand higher levels of service and supply, they are simutaneously wooed by other alternatives like mail order and out of-town-shopping. The International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management provides a link between production and consumer, and by understanding their relationship it allows retail personnel to study operations practice in other organizations, and to compare methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信