FMS2评估工具在8 ~ 12岁儿童中的结构效度和收敛效度

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nathan Gavigan, Sarahjane Belton, Una Britton, Shane Dalton, Johann Issartel
{"title":"FMS2评估工具在8 ~ 12岁儿童中的结构效度和收敛效度","authors":"Nathan Gavigan, Sarahjane Belton, Una Britton, Shane Dalton, Johann Issartel","doi":"10.1177/1356336x231209245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there is a plethora of tools available to assess children's movement competence (MC), the literature suggests that many have significant limitations (e.g. not being practical for use in many ‘real-world’ settings). The FMS 2 assessment tool has recently been developed as a targeted solution to many of the existing barriers preventing practitioners from utilising MC assessments. The aim of this study was to investigate the structural and convergent validity of this new tool among 8- to 12-year-old Irish primary school children. As part of this study, 102 children (56.8% female, mean = 9.8 years) were assessed using the FMS 2 , the Test of Gross Motor Development (3rd edition) (TGMD-3) (short version) and the Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™). Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The convergent validity between the FMS 2 , the TGMD-3 (short version) and the FMS™ was investigated using the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient. Results of CFA for the FMS 2 indicate a good fit model, supporting a three-factor structure (locomotor, object manipulation, and stability). Additional findings indicate a moderate, positive correlation between the FMS 2 and the TGMD-3 (short version) ( r = 0.66), with a low, positive correlation between the FMS 2 and the FMS™ ( r = 0.48). This study presents the first preliminary findings to suggest that the FMS 2 may be a versatile, time-efficient, and ecologically valid tool to measure children's MC in multiple settings (e.g. research, education, sport, athletic therapy, and physiotherapy). Future research should also seek to continue to implement this solution, consolidate the existing validity findings with a larger and more diverse sample, and further explore the feasibility of the tool in ‘real-world’ settings.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"133 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The structural and convergent validity of the FMS<sup>2</sup> assessment tool among 8- to 12-year-old children\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Gavigan, Sarahjane Belton, Una Britton, Shane Dalton, Johann Issartel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356336x231209245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although there is a plethora of tools available to assess children's movement competence (MC), the literature suggests that many have significant limitations (e.g. not being practical for use in many ‘real-world’ settings). The FMS 2 assessment tool has recently been developed as a targeted solution to many of the existing barriers preventing practitioners from utilising MC assessments. The aim of this study was to investigate the structural and convergent validity of this new tool among 8- to 12-year-old Irish primary school children. As part of this study, 102 children (56.8% female, mean = 9.8 years) were assessed using the FMS 2 , the Test of Gross Motor Development (3rd edition) (TGMD-3) (short version) and the Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™). Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The convergent validity between the FMS 2 , the TGMD-3 (short version) and the FMS™ was investigated using the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient. Results of CFA for the FMS 2 indicate a good fit model, supporting a three-factor structure (locomotor, object manipulation, and stability). Additional findings indicate a moderate, positive correlation between the FMS 2 and the TGMD-3 (short version) ( r = 0.66), with a low, positive correlation between the FMS 2 and the FMS™ ( r = 0.48). This study presents the first preliminary findings to suggest that the FMS 2 may be a versatile, time-efficient, and ecologically valid tool to measure children's MC in multiple settings (e.g. research, education, sport, athletic therapy, and physiotherapy). Future research should also seek to continue to implement this solution, consolidate the existing validity findings with a larger and more diverse sample, and further explore the feasibility of the tool in ‘real-world’ settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"volume\":\"133 22\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x231209245\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x231209245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有大量的工具可用于评估儿童的运动能力(MC),但文献表明,许多工具都有明显的局限性(例如,在许多“现实世界”环境中不实用)。FMS 2评估工具最近被开发为一个有针对性的解决方案,以解决许多现有的阻碍从业者利用MC评估的障碍。本研究的目的是调查这个新工具在8- 12岁的爱尔兰小学生中的结构效度和收敛效度。作为本研究的一部分,102名儿童(56.8%为女性,平均年龄为9.8岁)使用FMS 2、大肌肉运动发育测试(第三版)(TGMD-3)(短版)和功能运动筛查™(FMS™)进行评估。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度。采用Pearson积矩相关系数对FMS 2、TGMD-3(短版)和FMS™之间的收敛效度进行了研究。fms2的CFA结果显示了一个良好的拟合模型,支持三因素结构(运动、物体操作和稳定性)。其他研究结果表明,FMS 2和TGMD-3(短版本)之间存在中度正相关(r = 0.66), FMS 2和FMS™之间存在低正相关(r = 0.48)。本研究提出了第一个初步研究结果,表明FMS 2可能是一种多功能,时间效率高,生态有效的工具,可以在多种环境(如研究,教育,运动,运动治疗和物理治疗)中测量儿童的MC。未来的研究还应寻求继续实施这一解决方案,用更大、更多样化的样本巩固现有的有效性发现,并进一步探索该工具在“现实世界”环境中的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The structural and convergent validity of the FMS2 assessment tool among 8- to 12-year-old children
Although there is a plethora of tools available to assess children's movement competence (MC), the literature suggests that many have significant limitations (e.g. not being practical for use in many ‘real-world’ settings). The FMS 2 assessment tool has recently been developed as a targeted solution to many of the existing barriers preventing practitioners from utilising MC assessments. The aim of this study was to investigate the structural and convergent validity of this new tool among 8- to 12-year-old Irish primary school children. As part of this study, 102 children (56.8% female, mean = 9.8 years) were assessed using the FMS 2 , the Test of Gross Motor Development (3rd edition) (TGMD-3) (short version) and the Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™). Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The convergent validity between the FMS 2 , the TGMD-3 (short version) and the FMS™ was investigated using the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient. Results of CFA for the FMS 2 indicate a good fit model, supporting a three-factor structure (locomotor, object manipulation, and stability). Additional findings indicate a moderate, positive correlation between the FMS 2 and the TGMD-3 (short version) ( r = 0.66), with a low, positive correlation between the FMS 2 and the FMS™ ( r = 0.48). This study presents the first preliminary findings to suggest that the FMS 2 may be a versatile, time-efficient, and ecologically valid tool to measure children's MC in multiple settings (e.g. research, education, sport, athletic therapy, and physiotherapy). Future research should also seek to continue to implement this solution, consolidate the existing validity findings with a larger and more diverse sample, and further explore the feasibility of the tool in ‘real-world’ settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信