测绘医院物业和设施管理团队的知识需求:来自德尔菲研究的见解

Carl-Magnus Von Behr, Tim Minshall, John Clarkson
{"title":"测绘医院物业和设施管理团队的知识需求:来自德尔菲研究的见解","authors":"Carl-Magnus Von Behr, Tim Minshall, John Clarkson","doi":"10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of Estates and Facilities Management (EFM) in the healthcare sector is often overlooked despite its crucial contribution to the efficient delivery of clinical services. This paper explores the knowledge needs of EFM professionals at different job levels within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. Using a modified Delphi-technique approach, we collected data from three rounds of online questionnaires with a total of 152 EFM professionals. With the use of content analysis and descriptive statistics, we identify the most commonly reported knowledge needs across different organisational levels. Hierarchical clustering heatmaps visualise these varying knowledge needs of different job roles and their priority levels, allowing for easy identification of target areas for professional development. We identify four key categories of knowledge areas, illustrating evolving needs as professionals progress in their careers. Within these areas, four trends emerged across various hierarchical levels. Firstly, a reliance on external Authorising Engineers (AEs) for Technical Expertise & Experience, Benchmarking & New Technologies, and Professional Development was evident, raising concerns about aligning organisational expectations with top management expertise. Secondly, the skills required for the sustainability and digitalisation agenda lack emphasis, highlighting a crucial gap between organisational strategy and practical focus. Collaborative Proficiency surfaced as important for Managers and Heads of EFM, underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. However, at the Director of EFM level, there is a lower emphasis on networking and collaboration, which is in contrast to the current restructuring of the NHS towards Integrated Care Systems. Furthermore, the Directors of EFM have a strong focus on Financial Management skills, possibly influenced by the prevalent Board reporting structures. This focus, paired with the lack of focus on Technical Expertise & Experience and Benchmarking & New Technologies could influence the ability to secure funding for cutting-edge technologies while posing a large financial risk of relying on legacy systems. These findings underscore the need for targeted training programmes addressing these disparities and emphasise the importance of aligning organisational structures with evolving knowledge needs for effective healthcare EFM management. The research contributes to the understanding of knowledge management in organisational hierarchies and offers a framework applicable to other sectors and organisations. To enhance understanding, future studies could delve deeper into the identified trends, aiming to uncover the underlying causes and intricacies shaping the identified patterns.","PeriodicalId":496514,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance","volume":"22 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping Knowledge Needs of Hospital Estates and Facilities Management Teams: Insights from a Delphi Study\",\"authors\":\"Carl-Magnus Von Behr, Tim Minshall, John Clarkson\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The role of Estates and Facilities Management (EFM) in the healthcare sector is often overlooked despite its crucial contribution to the efficient delivery of clinical services. This paper explores the knowledge needs of EFM professionals at different job levels within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. Using a modified Delphi-technique approach, we collected data from three rounds of online questionnaires with a total of 152 EFM professionals. With the use of content analysis and descriptive statistics, we identify the most commonly reported knowledge needs across different organisational levels. Hierarchical clustering heatmaps visualise these varying knowledge needs of different job roles and their priority levels, allowing for easy identification of target areas for professional development. We identify four key categories of knowledge areas, illustrating evolving needs as professionals progress in their careers. Within these areas, four trends emerged across various hierarchical levels. Firstly, a reliance on external Authorising Engineers (AEs) for Technical Expertise & Experience, Benchmarking & New Technologies, and Professional Development was evident, raising concerns about aligning organisational expectations with top management expertise. Secondly, the skills required for the sustainability and digitalisation agenda lack emphasis, highlighting a crucial gap between organisational strategy and practical focus. Collaborative Proficiency surfaced as important for Managers and Heads of EFM, underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. However, at the Director of EFM level, there is a lower emphasis on networking and collaboration, which is in contrast to the current restructuring of the NHS towards Integrated Care Systems. Furthermore, the Directors of EFM have a strong focus on Financial Management skills, possibly influenced by the prevalent Board reporting structures. This focus, paired with the lack of focus on Technical Expertise & Experience and Benchmarking & New Technologies could influence the ability to secure funding for cutting-edge technologies while posing a large financial risk of relying on legacy systems. These findings underscore the need for targeted training programmes addressing these disparities and emphasise the importance of aligning organisational structures with evolving knowledge needs for effective healthcare EFM management. The research contributes to the understanding of knowledge management in organisational hierarchies and offers a framework applicable to other sectors and organisations. To enhance understanding, future studies could delve deeper into the identified trends, aiming to uncover the underlying causes and intricacies shaping the identified patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物业和设施管理(EFM)在医疗保健部门的作用往往被忽视,尽管它对有效提供临床服务的重要贡献。本文探讨了英国国家卫生服务(NHS)内不同工作级别的EFM专业人员的知识需求。采用改进的德尔菲技术方法,我们从三轮在线问卷中收集了152名EFM专业人员的数据。通过使用内容分析和描述性统计,我们确定了不同组织级别中最常见的报告知识需求。分层聚类热图将不同工作角色的不同知识需求及其优先级可视化,从而轻松确定专业发展的目标领域。我们确定了知识领域的四个关键类别,说明了专业人士在职业生涯中不断发展的需求。在这些领域中,出现了跨越不同层级的四种趋势。首先,对外部授权工程师(ae)的技术专长的依赖;经验,标杆&新技术和专业发展是显而易见的,这引起了人们对组织期望与高层管理专业知识相一致的担忧。其次,可持续发展和数字化议程所需的技能缺乏重视,凸显了组织战略与实际重点之间的重大差距。协作能力对EFM的管理者和负责人来说是很重要的,强调了跨学科协作的重要性。然而,在EFM主任级别,对网络和协作的重视程度较低,这与目前NHS向综合护理系统的重组形成鲜明对比。此外,EFM的董事非常注重财务管理技能,这可能受到普遍存在的董事会报告结构的影响。这种关注,加上缺乏对技术专长的关注;经验与标杆新技术可能会影响为尖端技术获得资金的能力,同时对依赖遗留系统带来巨大的财务风险。这些发现强调需要有针对性的培训方案来解决这些差异,并强调组织结构与不断变化的知识需求保持一致的重要性,以实现有效的医疗保健EFM管理。该研究有助于理解组织层级中的知识管理,并提供了一个适用于其他部门和组织的框架。为了加强理解,未来的研究可以更深入地研究已确定的趋势,旨在揭示形成已确定模式的潜在原因和复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping Knowledge Needs of Hospital Estates and Facilities Management Teams: Insights from a Delphi Study
The role of Estates and Facilities Management (EFM) in the healthcare sector is often overlooked despite its crucial contribution to the efficient delivery of clinical services. This paper explores the knowledge needs of EFM professionals at different job levels within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. Using a modified Delphi-technique approach, we collected data from three rounds of online questionnaires with a total of 152 EFM professionals. With the use of content analysis and descriptive statistics, we identify the most commonly reported knowledge needs across different organisational levels. Hierarchical clustering heatmaps visualise these varying knowledge needs of different job roles and their priority levels, allowing for easy identification of target areas for professional development. We identify four key categories of knowledge areas, illustrating evolving needs as professionals progress in their careers. Within these areas, four trends emerged across various hierarchical levels. Firstly, a reliance on external Authorising Engineers (AEs) for Technical Expertise & Experience, Benchmarking & New Technologies, and Professional Development was evident, raising concerns about aligning organisational expectations with top management expertise. Secondly, the skills required for the sustainability and digitalisation agenda lack emphasis, highlighting a crucial gap between organisational strategy and practical focus. Collaborative Proficiency surfaced as important for Managers and Heads of EFM, underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. However, at the Director of EFM level, there is a lower emphasis on networking and collaboration, which is in contrast to the current restructuring of the NHS towards Integrated Care Systems. Furthermore, the Directors of EFM have a strong focus on Financial Management skills, possibly influenced by the prevalent Board reporting structures. This focus, paired with the lack of focus on Technical Expertise & Experience and Benchmarking & New Technologies could influence the ability to secure funding for cutting-edge technologies while posing a large financial risk of relying on legacy systems. These findings underscore the need for targeted training programmes addressing these disparities and emphasise the importance of aligning organisational structures with evolving knowledge needs for effective healthcare EFM management. The research contributes to the understanding of knowledge management in organisational hierarchies and offers a framework applicable to other sectors and organisations. To enhance understanding, future studies could delve deeper into the identified trends, aiming to uncover the underlying causes and intricacies shaping the identified patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信