Iwona Gawron, Rafał Baran, Kamil Derbisz, Andrzej Zmaczyński, Robert Jach, Miłosz Pietrus
{"title":"阴道雌三醇或透明质酸是否有助于绝经前后宫腔镜检查?一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Iwona Gawron, Rafał Baran, Kamil Derbisz, Andrzej Zmaczyński, Robert Jach, Miłosz Pietrus","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5009194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain accompanying office hysteroscopy, possibly aggravated by urogenital atrophy, is the most common reason for its discontinuation. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaginal estriol and hyaluronic acid to facilitate the office hysteroscopy in peri and postmenopausal women. Methods: A prospective cohort study involved women aged 45–90 years subjected to office hysteroscopy. Women were assigned to three study arms: (A) 0.5 mg of estriol in vaginal cream twice daily for 10 days pre-procedure, (B) 5 mg of hyaluronic acid in vaginal gel twice daily for 10 days pre-procedure, (C) no medication. The following endpoints were compared: pain accompanying the procedure, need for cervical dilation, time of cervical passage, incidence of severe urogenital atrophy, and vaso-vagal reaction. Results: There were no significant differences between the arms in terms of pain intensity during (p = 0.93) and after the procedure (p = 0.17), need for cervical dilation (p = 0.5), cervical passage time (p = 0.1), severe urogenital atrophy (p = 0.15), and vaso-vagal reaction (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Despite unfavorable conditions in peri and postmenopausal women, cervical preparation in the above regimens did not seem to bring clinically significant benefits. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered under the number NCT05783479 in the Protocol Registration and Results System database (https://clinicaltrials.gov/). The database used for the study was made available in Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HSWURD).","PeriodicalId":10312,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Vaginal Estriol or Hyaluronic Acid Facilitate Office Hysteroscopy in Peri and Postmenopause? A Prospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Iwona Gawron, Rafał Baran, Kamil Derbisz, Andrzej Zmaczyński, Robert Jach, Miłosz Pietrus\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.ceog5009194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pain accompanying office hysteroscopy, possibly aggravated by urogenital atrophy, is the most common reason for its discontinuation. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaginal estriol and hyaluronic acid to facilitate the office hysteroscopy in peri and postmenopausal women. Methods: A prospective cohort study involved women aged 45–90 years subjected to office hysteroscopy. Women were assigned to three study arms: (A) 0.5 mg of estriol in vaginal cream twice daily for 10 days pre-procedure, (B) 5 mg of hyaluronic acid in vaginal gel twice daily for 10 days pre-procedure, (C) no medication. The following endpoints were compared: pain accompanying the procedure, need for cervical dilation, time of cervical passage, incidence of severe urogenital atrophy, and vaso-vagal reaction. Results: There were no significant differences between the arms in terms of pain intensity during (p = 0.93) and after the procedure (p = 0.17), need for cervical dilation (p = 0.5), cervical passage time (p = 0.1), severe urogenital atrophy (p = 0.15), and vaso-vagal reaction (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Despite unfavorable conditions in peri and postmenopausal women, cervical preparation in the above regimens did not seem to bring clinically significant benefits. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered under the number NCT05783479 in the Protocol Registration and Results System database (https://clinicaltrials.gov/). The database used for the study was made available in Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HSWURD).\",\"PeriodicalId\":10312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5009194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5009194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Vaginal Estriol or Hyaluronic Acid Facilitate Office Hysteroscopy in Peri and Postmenopause? A Prospective Cohort Study
Background: Pain accompanying office hysteroscopy, possibly aggravated by urogenital atrophy, is the most common reason for its discontinuation. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaginal estriol and hyaluronic acid to facilitate the office hysteroscopy in peri and postmenopausal women. Methods: A prospective cohort study involved women aged 45–90 years subjected to office hysteroscopy. Women were assigned to three study arms: (A) 0.5 mg of estriol in vaginal cream twice daily for 10 days pre-procedure, (B) 5 mg of hyaluronic acid in vaginal gel twice daily for 10 days pre-procedure, (C) no medication. The following endpoints were compared: pain accompanying the procedure, need for cervical dilation, time of cervical passage, incidence of severe urogenital atrophy, and vaso-vagal reaction. Results: There were no significant differences between the arms in terms of pain intensity during (p = 0.93) and after the procedure (p = 0.17), need for cervical dilation (p = 0.5), cervical passage time (p = 0.1), severe urogenital atrophy (p = 0.15), and vaso-vagal reaction (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Despite unfavorable conditions in peri and postmenopausal women, cervical preparation in the above regimens did not seem to bring clinically significant benefits. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered under the number NCT05783479 in the Protocol Registration and Results System database (https://clinicaltrials.gov/). The database used for the study was made available in Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HSWURD).
期刊介绍:
CEOG is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. CEOG covers all aspects of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine. All submissions of cutting-edge advances of medical research in the area of women''s health worldwide are encouraged.