生命伦理学是现代科技发展的人类中心论的保证

S. A. Tyulyakova
{"title":"生命伦理学是现代科技发展的人类中心论的保证","authors":"S. A. Tyulyakova","doi":"10.56654/ropi-2023-2(7)-98-111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the article is due to the acuteness of the public and scientific debate on the ethics of human cloning experiments: both from the point of view of violating the boundaries of human individuality, and from the standpoint of biological safety. Bioethics in this context becomes a reference point for any scientific research related to the human body, which is especially important in the modern «age of technological dehumanization». The article examines the disciplinary, philosophical, medical, anthropological aspects of bioethics in Russia and abroad, as well as the specifics of the legislative regulation of cloning issues. As a result of the analysis, the conclusion is postulated that ethical norms find themselves in a situation of opposition to the principles of bioeconomics, which implies the reproduction «to order» of a person with specified characteristics. A parallel is drawn with artificial intelligence, which also, in fact, imitates and reproduces individual processes of human thinking. Nevertheless, bioethics should not create barriers to the development of scientific knowledge and the improvement of medical technologies.","PeriodicalId":496792,"journal":{"name":"Russia society politics history","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioethics as a guarantor of the anthropocentricity of modern scientific and technological development\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Tyulyakova\",\"doi\":\"10.56654/ropi-2023-2(7)-98-111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the article is due to the acuteness of the public and scientific debate on the ethics of human cloning experiments: both from the point of view of violating the boundaries of human individuality, and from the standpoint of biological safety. Bioethics in this context becomes a reference point for any scientific research related to the human body, which is especially important in the modern «age of technological dehumanization». The article examines the disciplinary, philosophical, medical, anthropological aspects of bioethics in Russia and abroad, as well as the specifics of the legislative regulation of cloning issues. As a result of the analysis, the conclusion is postulated that ethical norms find themselves in a situation of opposition to the principles of bioeconomics, which implies the reproduction «to order» of a person with specified characteristics. A parallel is drawn with artificial intelligence, which also, in fact, imitates and reproduces individual processes of human thinking. Nevertheless, bioethics should not create barriers to the development of scientific knowledge and the improvement of medical technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russia society politics history\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russia society politics history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56654/ropi-2023-2(7)-98-111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia society politics history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56654/ropi-2023-2(7)-98-111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的相关性是由于公众和科学界对人类克隆实验伦理的激烈辩论:无论是从侵犯人类个性界限的角度,还是从生物安全的角度。在这种背景下,生命伦理学成为与人体有关的任何科学研究的参考点,这在现代“技术非人性化时代”尤为重要。本文考察了俄罗斯和国外生物伦理学的学科、哲学、医学、人类学方面,以及克隆问题立法规定的具体情况。作为分析的结果,结论是假设伦理规范发现自己处于与生物经济学原则相反的境地,这意味着具有特定特征的人的“有序”繁殖。这与人工智能有相似之处,事实上,人工智能也模仿和复制了人类思维的个体过程。然而,生物伦理不应成为科学知识发展和医疗技术改进的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioethics as a guarantor of the anthropocentricity of modern scientific and technological development
The relevance of the article is due to the acuteness of the public and scientific debate on the ethics of human cloning experiments: both from the point of view of violating the boundaries of human individuality, and from the standpoint of biological safety. Bioethics in this context becomes a reference point for any scientific research related to the human body, which is especially important in the modern «age of technological dehumanization». The article examines the disciplinary, philosophical, medical, anthropological aspects of bioethics in Russia and abroad, as well as the specifics of the legislative regulation of cloning issues. As a result of the analysis, the conclusion is postulated that ethical norms find themselves in a situation of opposition to the principles of bioeconomics, which implies the reproduction «to order» of a person with specified characteristics. A parallel is drawn with artificial intelligence, which also, in fact, imitates and reproduces individual processes of human thinking. Nevertheless, bioethics should not create barriers to the development of scientific knowledge and the improvement of medical technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信