家长对儿童身体虐待和监管忽视的报告是否会因研究招募方法或调查管理模式的不同而有所区别?

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Bridget Freisthler PhD, Christiana Kranich MSW, Jennifer Price Wolf PhD
{"title":"家长对儿童身体虐待和监管忽视的报告是否会因研究招募方法或调查管理模式的不同而有所区别?","authors":"Bridget Freisthler PhD,&nbsp;Christiana Kranich MSW,&nbsp;Jennifer Price Wolf PhD","doi":"10.1111/cfs.13097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>General population studies find that rates of child maltreatment are higher than those identified in the child welfare system. Some modes of administration may result in higher disclosure rates of child maltreatment by respondents. This study assesses differences in characteristics of parents who are recruited using telephone sampling techniques or via the internet and whether the survey was administered by telephone or the web. We have 1599 parent respondents recruited from listed samples and Craigslist advertisements. Surveys were administered via the telephone or online. Survey included measures of parenting behaviours, psychosocial characteristics and demographics for the parent, child and family. Data were analysed using logit multilevel models. We found no differences between mode of administration and our child maltreatment and parenting measures, including physical abuse, corporal punishment and supervisory neglect. Recruitment strategy was not related to leaving a child home alone and corporal punishment. However, we did find that parents recruited by Craigslist use physical abuse more frequently. That we found no difference in use of punitive and neglectful parenting practices by survey mode of administration and recruitment method provides some degree of confidence that survey methods other than random-digit-dialling telephone surveys may result in generalizable samples in this age of declining landline use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10025,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":"29 2","pages":"438-449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does parent report of child physical abuse and supervisory neglect differ by method of study recruitment or mode of survey administration?\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Freisthler PhD,&nbsp;Christiana Kranich MSW,&nbsp;Jennifer Price Wolf PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cfs.13097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>General population studies find that rates of child maltreatment are higher than those identified in the child welfare system. Some modes of administration may result in higher disclosure rates of child maltreatment by respondents. This study assesses differences in characteristics of parents who are recruited using telephone sampling techniques or via the internet and whether the survey was administered by telephone or the web. We have 1599 parent respondents recruited from listed samples and Craigslist advertisements. Surveys were administered via the telephone or online. Survey included measures of parenting behaviours, psychosocial characteristics and demographics for the parent, child and family. Data were analysed using logit multilevel models. We found no differences between mode of administration and our child maltreatment and parenting measures, including physical abuse, corporal punishment and supervisory neglect. Recruitment strategy was not related to leaving a child home alone and corporal punishment. However, we did find that parents recruited by Craigslist use physical abuse more frequently. That we found no difference in use of punitive and neglectful parenting practices by survey mode of administration and recruitment method provides some degree of confidence that survey methods other than random-digit-dialling telephone surveys may result in generalizable samples in this age of declining landline use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"438-449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13097\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13097\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普通人群研究发现,儿童受虐待的比例要高于儿童福利系统发现的比例。某些管理模式可能会使受访者披露儿童虐待情况的比率更高。本研究评估了使用电话抽样技术或通过互联网招募的家长的特征差异,以及调查是通过电话还是网络进行的。我们从列表样本和 Craigslist 广告中招募了 1599 名家长受访者。调查通过电话或网络进行。调查内容包括父母的养育行为、社会心理特征以及父母、子女和家庭的人口统计学特征。数据采用对数多层次模型进行分析。我们发现,管理模式与我们的儿童虐待和养育措施(包括身体虐待、体罚和监管忽视)之间没有差异。招募策略与将儿童独自留在家中和体罚无关。不过,我们确实发现通过 Craigslist 招募的父母更经常使用身体虐待。我们发现,在使用惩罚性和忽视性养育方法方面,调查方式和招募方法没有差异,这在一定程度上说明,在座机使用率下降的今天,除随机拨号电话调查以外的其他调查方法可能会产生具有普遍性的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does parent report of child physical abuse and supervisory neglect differ by method of study recruitment or mode of survey administration?

General population studies find that rates of child maltreatment are higher than those identified in the child welfare system. Some modes of administration may result in higher disclosure rates of child maltreatment by respondents. This study assesses differences in characteristics of parents who are recruited using telephone sampling techniques or via the internet and whether the survey was administered by telephone or the web. We have 1599 parent respondents recruited from listed samples and Craigslist advertisements. Surveys were administered via the telephone or online. Survey included measures of parenting behaviours, psychosocial characteristics and demographics for the parent, child and family. Data were analysed using logit multilevel models. We found no differences between mode of administration and our child maltreatment and parenting measures, including physical abuse, corporal punishment and supervisory neglect. Recruitment strategy was not related to leaving a child home alone and corporal punishment. However, we did find that parents recruited by Craigslist use physical abuse more frequently. That we found no difference in use of punitive and neglectful parenting practices by survey mode of administration and recruitment method provides some degree of confidence that survey methods other than random-digit-dialling telephone surveys may result in generalizable samples in this age of declining landline use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Child and Family Social Work provides a forum where researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and managers in the field of child and family social work exchange knowledge, increase understanding and develop notions of good practice. In its promotion of research and practice, which is both disciplined and articulate, the Journal is dedicated to advancing the wellbeing and welfare of children and their families throughout the world. Child and Family Social Work publishes original and distinguished contributions on matters of research, theory, policy and practice in the field of social work with children and their families. The Journal gives international definition to the discipline and practice of child and family social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信