{"title":"计量经济学家机器学习的实际应用:自述手册","authors":"Marcos López de Prado","doi":"10.3905/pa.2023.pa569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In <ext-link><bold><italic>Machine Learning for Econometricians: The Readme Manual</italic></bold></ext-link>, from the Summer 2022 issue of <bold><italic>The Journal of Financial Data Science</italic></bold>, <bold>Marcos López de Prado</bold>, of <bold>Cornell University</bold> and the <bold>Abu Dhabi Investment Authority</bold>, concisely covers many machine learning (ML) techniques and links them to analogous steps in the econometric research process: goal setting, outlier detection, visualization, feature extraction, regression, classification, feature importance, model selection, and validation. It is a must-read for econometricians who want to utilize increasingly available “big data” and the algorithms designed to process it. Econometricians should not be deterred by notions of ML as a black box. López de Prado explains that there are several methods for interpreting model results. ML consists of powerful techniques that can enrich our understanding of complex relationships that relatively simple traditional econometric methods cannot grasp. He does not imply that ML should replace econometrics but rather that it complements traditional methods of analysis. Furthermore, he notes that ignoring economic theory can result in poorly designed research studies and false discoveries. Importantly, he makes a strong case for econometricians to modernize their quantitative toolbox, and he offers a roadmap for updating their tools and improving their research skills.","PeriodicalId":500434,"journal":{"name":"Practical applications of institutional investor journals","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Applications of Machine Learning for Econometricians: The Readme Manual\",\"authors\":\"Marcos López de Prado\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/pa.2023.pa569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In <ext-link><bold><italic>Machine Learning for Econometricians: The Readme Manual</italic></bold></ext-link>, from the Summer 2022 issue of <bold><italic>The Journal of Financial Data Science</italic></bold>, <bold>Marcos López de Prado</bold>, of <bold>Cornell University</bold> and the <bold>Abu Dhabi Investment Authority</bold>, concisely covers many machine learning (ML) techniques and links them to analogous steps in the econometric research process: goal setting, outlier detection, visualization, feature extraction, regression, classification, feature importance, model selection, and validation. It is a must-read for econometricians who want to utilize increasingly available “big data” and the algorithms designed to process it. Econometricians should not be deterred by notions of ML as a black box. López de Prado explains that there are several methods for interpreting model results. ML consists of powerful techniques that can enrich our understanding of complex relationships that relatively simple traditional econometric methods cannot grasp. He does not imply that ML should replace econometrics but rather that it complements traditional methods of analysis. Furthermore, he notes that ignoring economic theory can result in poorly designed research studies and false discoveries. Importantly, he makes a strong case for econometricians to modernize their quantitative toolbox, and he offers a roadmap for updating their tools and improving their research skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical applications of institutional investor journals\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical applications of institutional investor journals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/pa.2023.pa569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical applications of institutional investor journals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/pa.2023.pa569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
康奈尔大学和阿布扎比投资局的Marcos López de Prado在《计量经济学家的机器学习:自述手册》(The Readme Manual)中,简明地介绍了许多机器学习(ML)技术,并将它们与计量经济学研究过程中的类似步骤联系起来:目标设定、异常值检测、可视化、特征提取、回归、分类、特征重要性、模型选择和验证。对于想要利用日益可用的“大数据”和处理这些数据的算法的计量经济学家来说,这是一本必读的书。计量经济学家不应该被机器学习作为黑盒子的概念所吓倒。López de Prado解释说,有几种解释模型结果的方法。ML由强大的技术组成,可以丰富我们对相对简单的传统计量经济学方法无法掌握的复杂关系的理解。他并没有暗示机器学习应该取代计量经济学,而是补充了传统的分析方法。此外,他指出,忽视经济理论可能导致设计不良的研究和错误的发现。重要的是,他为计量经济学家现代化他们的定量工具箱提出了强有力的理由,他为更新他们的工具和提高他们的研究技能提供了一个路线图。
Practical Applications of Machine Learning for Econometricians: The Readme Manual
In Machine Learning for Econometricians: The Readme Manual, from the Summer 2022 issue of The Journal of Financial Data Science, Marcos López de Prado, of Cornell University and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, concisely covers many machine learning (ML) techniques and links them to analogous steps in the econometric research process: goal setting, outlier detection, visualization, feature extraction, regression, classification, feature importance, model selection, and validation. It is a must-read for econometricians who want to utilize increasingly available “big data” and the algorithms designed to process it. Econometricians should not be deterred by notions of ML as a black box. López de Prado explains that there are several methods for interpreting model results. ML consists of powerful techniques that can enrich our understanding of complex relationships that relatively simple traditional econometric methods cannot grasp. He does not imply that ML should replace econometrics but rather that it complements traditional methods of analysis. Furthermore, he notes that ignoring economic theory can result in poorly designed research studies and false discoveries. Importantly, he makes a strong case for econometricians to modernize their quantitative toolbox, and he offers a roadmap for updating their tools and improving their research skills.