美国木工班的关怀维度与学校的木工游戏

Q3 Social Sciences
Elliott Kuecker
{"title":"美国木工班的关怀维度与学校的木工游戏","authors":"Elliott Kuecker","doi":"10.1080/15505170.2023.2262942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article posits that within American woodworking and wood play school curriculum—across time periods and age ranges—there is a hidden-in-plain-site dimension of care toward non-human things, like tools and wood. Analyzing American teacher guidebooks, curriculum descriptions, educational research journals, technical education magazines, newsletters, school textbooks, and other sources, this study describes how the dimension of care is revealed, despite not being named as an explicit educational purpose. An ethics of care is theorized in this study as quotidian habits of maintenance and reverence toward non-human things. Emphasizing this style of care provides a new way of seeing American wood shop class, and related lessons, away from their vocational backdrop, and provides current educators with inspiration on how woodworking and wood play could be integrated into curriculum concerned with promoting a less anthropocentric ethics in the classroom.Keywords: Careindustrial educationvocational educationwoodworkingethics Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The traditional shop class style of woodworking arrived in United States’ public schools in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to fill the “middle-level-skill vacuum” (p. 47), and “society demanded it be filled, and by the schools” (Venn, Citation1964, p. 47). Woodworking and wood play shows up in many others ways before and after that, but the American woodshop imaginary is dominated by this association between carpentry and vocational education, as so many experienced woodshop class because of this.2 Because I use photographs in the public domain, the images here are largely only from the early 20th century.Additional informationNotes on contributorsElliott KueckerElliott Kuecker is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the School of Information and Library Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He teaches archival research, archival processing, and more. Some of his work can be found in the Journal of Childhood Studies, Qualitative Inquiry, International Review of Qualitative Research, Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, and other venues.","PeriodicalId":15501,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dimension of care in American woodshop class and wood play in schools\",\"authors\":\"Elliott Kuecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15505170.2023.2262942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis article posits that within American woodworking and wood play school curriculum—across time periods and age ranges—there is a hidden-in-plain-site dimension of care toward non-human things, like tools and wood. Analyzing American teacher guidebooks, curriculum descriptions, educational research journals, technical education magazines, newsletters, school textbooks, and other sources, this study describes how the dimension of care is revealed, despite not being named as an explicit educational purpose. An ethics of care is theorized in this study as quotidian habits of maintenance and reverence toward non-human things. Emphasizing this style of care provides a new way of seeing American wood shop class, and related lessons, away from their vocational backdrop, and provides current educators with inspiration on how woodworking and wood play could be integrated into curriculum concerned with promoting a less anthropocentric ethics in the classroom.Keywords: Careindustrial educationvocational educationwoodworkingethics Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The traditional shop class style of woodworking arrived in United States’ public schools in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to fill the “middle-level-skill vacuum” (p. 47), and “society demanded it be filled, and by the schools” (Venn, Citation1964, p. 47). Woodworking and wood play shows up in many others ways before and after that, but the American woodshop imaginary is dominated by this association between carpentry and vocational education, as so many experienced woodshop class because of this.2 Because I use photographs in the public domain, the images here are largely only from the early 20th century.Additional informationNotes on contributorsElliott KueckerElliott Kuecker is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the School of Information and Library Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He teaches archival research, archival processing, and more. Some of his work can be found in the Journal of Childhood Studies, Qualitative Inquiry, International Review of Qualitative Research, Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, and other venues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2023.2262942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2023.2262942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文认为,在美国的木工和木游戏学校课程中——跨越时间和年龄范围——隐藏在对非人类事物的关怀维度,如工具和木材。本研究分析了美国教师指南、课程描述、教育研究期刊、技术教育杂志、时事通讯、学校教科书和其他来源,描述了尽管没有被指定为明确的教育目的,但关怀的维度是如何揭示的。本研究将关怀伦理理论化为维护和尊重非人类事物的日常习惯。强调这种风格的关怀提供了一种新的方式来看待美国木工课和相关课程,远离他们的职业背景,并为当前的教育工作者提供了灵感,关于如何将木工和木材游戏整合到课程中,以促进课堂上不那么以人类为中心的伦理。关键词:职业教育职业教育木工职业道德披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 19世纪末和20世纪初,传统的木工工场授课风格进入了美国的公立学校,以填补“中等水平技能的真空”(第47页),“社会要求填补这一空白,而且由学校填补”(Venn, Citation1964,第47页)。在那之前和之后,木工和木材游戏以许多其他方式出现,但美国的木工想象是由木工和职业教育之间的联系主导的,因为很多人经历过木工课因为我使用的是公共领域的照片,所以这里的图片主要来自20世纪初。作者简介:elliott Kuecker是北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校信息与图书馆科学学院的助教。他教授档案研究、档案处理等课程。他的一些工作可以在《儿童研究杂志》、《质性调查》、《质性研究国际评论》、《教育研究方法论的重新定义》等杂志上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dimension of care in American woodshop class and wood play in schools
AbstractThis article posits that within American woodworking and wood play school curriculum—across time periods and age ranges—there is a hidden-in-plain-site dimension of care toward non-human things, like tools and wood. Analyzing American teacher guidebooks, curriculum descriptions, educational research journals, technical education magazines, newsletters, school textbooks, and other sources, this study describes how the dimension of care is revealed, despite not being named as an explicit educational purpose. An ethics of care is theorized in this study as quotidian habits of maintenance and reverence toward non-human things. Emphasizing this style of care provides a new way of seeing American wood shop class, and related lessons, away from their vocational backdrop, and provides current educators with inspiration on how woodworking and wood play could be integrated into curriculum concerned with promoting a less anthropocentric ethics in the classroom.Keywords: Careindustrial educationvocational educationwoodworkingethics Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The traditional shop class style of woodworking arrived in United States’ public schools in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to fill the “middle-level-skill vacuum” (p. 47), and “society demanded it be filled, and by the schools” (Venn, Citation1964, p. 47). Woodworking and wood play shows up in many others ways before and after that, but the American woodshop imaginary is dominated by this association between carpentry and vocational education, as so many experienced woodshop class because of this.2 Because I use photographs in the public domain, the images here are largely only from the early 20th century.Additional informationNotes on contributorsElliott KueckerElliott Kuecker is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the School of Information and Library Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He teaches archival research, archival processing, and more. Some of his work can be found in the Journal of Childhood Studies, Qualitative Inquiry, International Review of Qualitative Research, Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, and other venues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy
Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy is dedicated to the study of curriculum theory, educational inquiry, and pedagogical praxis. This leading international journal brings together scholars from a variety of disciplines to explore and critically examine diverse perspective on educational phenomena, from schools and cultural institutions to sites and concerns beyond institutional boundaries. The journal publishes articles that explore historical, philosophical, gendered, queer, racial, ethnic, indigenous, postcolonial, linguistic, autobiographical, aesthetic, theological, and/or international curriculum concerns and issues. The Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy aims to promote emergent scholarship that critiques and extends curriculum questions and education foundations that have relation to practice by embracing a plurality of critical, decolonizing education sciences that inform local struggles in universities, schools, classroom, and communities. This journal provides a platform for critical scholarship that will counter-narrate Eurocratic, whitened, instrumentalized, mainstream education. Submissions should be no more than 9,000 words (excluding references) and should be submitted in APA 6th edition format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信