Rebecca G Johnson, Kelly-Ann Allen, Beatriz Gallo Cordoba
{"title":"文化在学校中属于什么位置?探讨个人主义和权力距离在跨文化学校归属感中的作用","authors":"Rebecca G Johnson, Kelly-Ann Allen, Beatriz Gallo Cordoba","doi":"10.1007/s12144-023-05280-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relationship between culture and school belonging has rarely been examined relative to student and school-level factors. This study explored whether culture, measured through individualism and power distance, plays a role in school belonging across countries. The study, designed to separate the effects of within-school teacher support from country-level effects, was conducted on a cross-cultural sample of 413,575 students drawn from 53 countries. Initial analysis of the 2018 PISA survey data and Hofstede's cultural dimensions suggested that individualism and teacher support were negatively associated, whereas power distance was positively associated with teacher support. However, although higher teacher support was linked with higher levels of belonging, both culture measures had a negative total association with belonging. Further analysis indicated that teacher support was positively associated with belonging within schools, while at a country level, students reported lower levels of belonging in countries with higher teacher support. The overall negative relationship between power distance and belonging could be attributed to the negative indirect effect of country-level teacher support. Moreover, results showed that students' perception of cooperation at school, experiences of bullying, and perceptions of a disruptive disciplinary climate were all significant predictors of school belonging. Findings also indicated that individualism and power distance at the country level also had significant effects on school belonging. These findings underscore the need for multifaceted interventions to improve school belonging. This includes enhancing teacher support, fostering a cooperative school environment, mitigating bullying, and advocating for equitable education policies with full consideration of context-specific implications. This study illuminates the complex interplay between school belonging, teacher support, and cultural factors, emphasising the importance of distinguishing between within-school and country-level effects.","PeriodicalId":48075,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychology","volume":"41 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where does culture belong at school? Exploring the role of individualism and power distance in school belonging across cultures\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca G Johnson, Kelly-Ann Allen, Beatriz Gallo Cordoba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12144-023-05280-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The relationship between culture and school belonging has rarely been examined relative to student and school-level factors. This study explored whether culture, measured through individualism and power distance, plays a role in school belonging across countries. The study, designed to separate the effects of within-school teacher support from country-level effects, was conducted on a cross-cultural sample of 413,575 students drawn from 53 countries. Initial analysis of the 2018 PISA survey data and Hofstede's cultural dimensions suggested that individualism and teacher support were negatively associated, whereas power distance was positively associated with teacher support. However, although higher teacher support was linked with higher levels of belonging, both culture measures had a negative total association with belonging. Further analysis indicated that teacher support was positively associated with belonging within schools, while at a country level, students reported lower levels of belonging in countries with higher teacher support. The overall negative relationship between power distance and belonging could be attributed to the negative indirect effect of country-level teacher support. Moreover, results showed that students' perception of cooperation at school, experiences of bullying, and perceptions of a disruptive disciplinary climate were all significant predictors of school belonging. Findings also indicated that individualism and power distance at the country level also had significant effects on school belonging. These findings underscore the need for multifaceted interventions to improve school belonging. This includes enhancing teacher support, fostering a cooperative school environment, mitigating bullying, and advocating for equitable education policies with full consideration of context-specific implications. This study illuminates the complex interplay between school belonging, teacher support, and cultural factors, emphasising the importance of distinguishing between within-school and country-level effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Psychology\",\"volume\":\"41 14\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05280-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05280-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where does culture belong at school? Exploring the role of individualism and power distance in school belonging across cultures
Abstract The relationship between culture and school belonging has rarely been examined relative to student and school-level factors. This study explored whether culture, measured through individualism and power distance, plays a role in school belonging across countries. The study, designed to separate the effects of within-school teacher support from country-level effects, was conducted on a cross-cultural sample of 413,575 students drawn from 53 countries. Initial analysis of the 2018 PISA survey data and Hofstede's cultural dimensions suggested that individualism and teacher support were negatively associated, whereas power distance was positively associated with teacher support. However, although higher teacher support was linked with higher levels of belonging, both culture measures had a negative total association with belonging. Further analysis indicated that teacher support was positively associated with belonging within schools, while at a country level, students reported lower levels of belonging in countries with higher teacher support. The overall negative relationship between power distance and belonging could be attributed to the negative indirect effect of country-level teacher support. Moreover, results showed that students' perception of cooperation at school, experiences of bullying, and perceptions of a disruptive disciplinary climate were all significant predictors of school belonging. Findings also indicated that individualism and power distance at the country level also had significant effects on school belonging. These findings underscore the need for multifaceted interventions to improve school belonging. This includes enhancing teacher support, fostering a cooperative school environment, mitigating bullying, and advocating for equitable education policies with full consideration of context-specific implications. This study illuminates the complex interplay between school belonging, teacher support, and cultural factors, emphasising the importance of distinguishing between within-school and country-level effects.
期刊介绍:
Current Psychology is an international forum for rapid dissemination of peer-reviewed research at the cutting edge of psychology. It welcomes significant and rigorous empirical and theoretical contributions from all the major areas of psychology, including but not limited to: cognitive psychology and cognition, social, clinical, health, developmental, methodological, and personality psychology, neuropsychology, psychometrics, human factors, and educational psychology.