学校通风率与COVID-19室内空气传播潜力的关系

IF 2.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Seamus Harrington, Mark Mulville, Spyros Stravoravdis
{"title":"学校通风率与COVID-19室内空气传播潜力的关系","authors":"Seamus Harrington, Mark Mulville, Spyros Stravoravdis","doi":"10.1080/17452007.2023.2263519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The requirement for natural ventilation strategies in classrooms to perform in respect to both their inherent and adaptive capacity is necessary to mitigate the risk of transmission associated with infectious airborne pathogens such as COVID-19. This paper assesses the performance of ten classrooms considering (a) the designed versus actual ventilation capacity; (b) the probability of airborne disease transmission by unit time resulting from calculated ventilation rates and (c) the reduction of transmission risk associated with mask wearing by all occupants. Monitored air changes per hour (ACH) range from 0.26–1.7, demonstrating that none of the classrooms meet designed ventilation rate whilst in operation. If the designed ventilation rate of 5 ACH were to be achieved, it would represent an infection risk of less than 1% during standard class durations and 5% over an 8-hour school day. The minimum achieved ventilation rate represents an infection risk of 7–12% (per class) and 75–100% (per school day) dependent on classroom specific parameters. Protection is afforded by the wearing of masks within the indoor school setting. During specified class durations in settings with sub-optimal ventilation rates, probability of infection can be reduced from 7–12% to 1–5%. Over an 8-hour school day, probability of infection can be reduced from 75–100% to 18–43%. These reductions are possible dependent on mask choice.","PeriodicalId":48523,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Engineering and Design Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between ventilation rates in schools and the indoor airborne transmission potential of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Seamus Harrington, Mark Mulville, Spyros Stravoravdis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17452007.2023.2263519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The requirement for natural ventilation strategies in classrooms to perform in respect to both their inherent and adaptive capacity is necessary to mitigate the risk of transmission associated with infectious airborne pathogens such as COVID-19. This paper assesses the performance of ten classrooms considering (a) the designed versus actual ventilation capacity; (b) the probability of airborne disease transmission by unit time resulting from calculated ventilation rates and (c) the reduction of transmission risk associated with mask wearing by all occupants. Monitored air changes per hour (ACH) range from 0.26–1.7, demonstrating that none of the classrooms meet designed ventilation rate whilst in operation. If the designed ventilation rate of 5 ACH were to be achieved, it would represent an infection risk of less than 1% during standard class durations and 5% over an 8-hour school day. The minimum achieved ventilation rate represents an infection risk of 7–12% (per class) and 75–100% (per school day) dependent on classroom specific parameters. Protection is afforded by the wearing of masks within the indoor school setting. During specified class durations in settings with sub-optimal ventilation rates, probability of infection can be reduced from 7–12% to 1–5%. Over an 8-hour school day, probability of infection can be reduced from 75–100% to 18–43%. These reductions are possible dependent on mask choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architectural Engineering and Design Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architectural Engineering and Design Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2263519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Engineering and Design Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2263519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教室自然通风策略必须兼顾其固有和适应能力,以减轻与COVID-19等传染性空气传播病原体相关的传播风险。本文评估了十个教室的性能考虑(a)设计与实际通风能力;(b)计算出的通风量在单位时间内导致疾病经空气传播的概率,以及(c)所有乘员佩戴口罩所减少的传播风险。监测的每小时换气量(ACH)范围为0.26-1.7,表明在运行时没有教室达到设计的换气率。如果达到设计的5乙酰胆碱通气率,则在标准上课时间内感染风险小于1%,在8小时上课时间内感染风险小于5%。最低通风率代表感染风险为7-12%(每个班级)和75-100%(每个上学日),具体取决于教室的具体参数。在室内学校环境中,通过戴口罩提供保护。在指定的班级持续时间内,在次优通气率的设置下,感染概率可以从7-12%降低到1-5%。每天上学8小时,感染概率可从75-100%降低到18-43%。这些减少可能取决于口罩的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between ventilation rates in schools and the indoor airborne transmission potential of COVID-19
The requirement for natural ventilation strategies in classrooms to perform in respect to both their inherent and adaptive capacity is necessary to mitigate the risk of transmission associated with infectious airborne pathogens such as COVID-19. This paper assesses the performance of ten classrooms considering (a) the designed versus actual ventilation capacity; (b) the probability of airborne disease transmission by unit time resulting from calculated ventilation rates and (c) the reduction of transmission risk associated with mask wearing by all occupants. Monitored air changes per hour (ACH) range from 0.26–1.7, demonstrating that none of the classrooms meet designed ventilation rate whilst in operation. If the designed ventilation rate of 5 ACH were to be achieved, it would represent an infection risk of less than 1% during standard class durations and 5% over an 8-hour school day. The minimum achieved ventilation rate represents an infection risk of 7–12% (per class) and 75–100% (per school day) dependent on classroom specific parameters. Protection is afforded by the wearing of masks within the indoor school setting. During specified class durations in settings with sub-optimal ventilation rates, probability of infection can be reduced from 7–12% to 1–5%. Over an 8-hour school day, probability of infection can be reduced from 75–100% to 18–43%. These reductions are possible dependent on mask choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Informative and accessible, this publication analyses and discusses the integration of the main stages within the process of design and construction and multidisciplinary collaborative working between the different professionals involved. Ideal for practitioners and academics alike, Architectural Engineering and Design Management examines specific topics on architectural technology, engineering design, building performance and building design management to highlight the interfaces between them and bridge the gap between architectural abstraction and engineering practice. Coverage includes: -Integration of architectural and engineering design -Integration of building design and construction -Building design management; planning and co-ordination, information and knowledge management, vale engineering and value management -Collaborative working and collaborative visualisation in building design -Architectural technology -Sustainable architecture -Building thermal, aural, visual and structural performance -Education and architectural engineering This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics (teachers, researchers and students) involved in building design and construction, including the following disciplines: -Architecture -Building Engineering -Building Service Engineering -Building Physics -Design Management and Design Coordination -Facilities Management Published papers will report on both fundamental research dealing with theoretical work and applied research dealing with practical issues and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between technical considerations and management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信