新自由主义女性主义在美国教师哺乳行为中的表现

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kelsey Benson, Ajay Sharma
{"title":"新自由主义女性主义在美国教师哺乳行为中的表现","authors":"Kelsey Benson, Ajay Sharma","doi":"10.1080/09540253.2023.2272811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study investigates the material-discursive contexts available for lactation amongst U.S. teachers who wish to continue nursing [a] child(ren) upon returning full-time to the classroom. Using critical feminist methodologies, we interviewed teacher-parents who chose to lactate or nurse their infants while at school. The study suggests that schools in the United States might be rife with neo-patriarchy that is highly oppressive to teacher-parents. Further, we found that the few discursive strategies available to lactating teacher-parents to navigate a tenuous work/life balance tend to be largely rooted in the highly individualized, responsibilised discourse of neoliberal feminism that is woefully inadequate to pose any serious challenge to the entrenched neo-patriarchy in schools.KEYWORDS: Feminismneo-patriarchylactationteachers Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 All names used are pseudonyms, selected by participants themselves during initial rounds of member checking.2 In 2022, a whistleblower complaint about bacterial contamination at poorly regulated factories led to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigation of Abbott, a corporation responsible for approximately 40% of the U.S. formula supply (Schreiber Citation2023, March 8). The resulting nationwide formula shortage lasted for most of 2022, with continuing supply chain reverberations into 2023.3 The purported health benefits of lactation have been contested by some feminist researchers. For instance, Williams (Citation2012) and Oster (Citation2019) both point out that most studies of lactation are biassed by the fact that women who have the time, space, and energy to practise lactation typically have education and financial resources that mark them as categorically privileged and therefore able to access different choices than women who do not. Therefore it is almost impossible to establish a causal relationship between health and educational attainment outcomes of babies who are and are not breastfed, since the high levels of income and education possessed by parents would correlate with better short and long-term outcomes for children even independent of lactation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsKelsey BensonKelsey Benson is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Educational Theory and Practice, at the University of Georgia, Athens, United States of America. Kelsey began her foray into education as a Peace Corps Volunteer in the West African nation of Guinea. Upon returning to the United States, she taught middle grades Special Education for six years. She is currently interested in intersections of feminist theory and neoliberalism for her dissertation research.Ajay SharmaAjay Sharma is a professor in the Department of Educational Theory and Practice, at the University of Georgia, Athens, United States of America. His current research centres on theoretical and ethnographic explorations of neoliberalism’s impact on education. In his past research, Ajay Sharma has focused on representations of nature in science education, and classroom discourse in K-12 science classrooms from the perspectives of individual agency and equity.","PeriodicalId":12486,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Education","volume":"15 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manifestations of neoliberal feminism in U.S. teacher lactation behaviours\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey Benson, Ajay Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09540253.2023.2272811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study investigates the material-discursive contexts available for lactation amongst U.S. teachers who wish to continue nursing [a] child(ren) upon returning full-time to the classroom. Using critical feminist methodologies, we interviewed teacher-parents who chose to lactate or nurse their infants while at school. The study suggests that schools in the United States might be rife with neo-patriarchy that is highly oppressive to teacher-parents. Further, we found that the few discursive strategies available to lactating teacher-parents to navigate a tenuous work/life balance tend to be largely rooted in the highly individualized, responsibilised discourse of neoliberal feminism that is woefully inadequate to pose any serious challenge to the entrenched neo-patriarchy in schools.KEYWORDS: Feminismneo-patriarchylactationteachers Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 All names used are pseudonyms, selected by participants themselves during initial rounds of member checking.2 In 2022, a whistleblower complaint about bacterial contamination at poorly regulated factories led to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigation of Abbott, a corporation responsible for approximately 40% of the U.S. formula supply (Schreiber Citation2023, March 8). The resulting nationwide formula shortage lasted for most of 2022, with continuing supply chain reverberations into 2023.3 The purported health benefits of lactation have been contested by some feminist researchers. For instance, Williams (Citation2012) and Oster (Citation2019) both point out that most studies of lactation are biassed by the fact that women who have the time, space, and energy to practise lactation typically have education and financial resources that mark them as categorically privileged and therefore able to access different choices than women who do not. Therefore it is almost impossible to establish a causal relationship between health and educational attainment outcomes of babies who are and are not breastfed, since the high levels of income and education possessed by parents would correlate with better short and long-term outcomes for children even independent of lactation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsKelsey BensonKelsey Benson is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Educational Theory and Practice, at the University of Georgia, Athens, United States of America. Kelsey began her foray into education as a Peace Corps Volunteer in the West African nation of Guinea. Upon returning to the United States, she taught middle grades Special Education for six years. She is currently interested in intersections of feminist theory and neoliberalism for her dissertation research.Ajay SharmaAjay Sharma is a professor in the Department of Educational Theory and Practice, at the University of Georgia, Athens, United States of America. His current research centres on theoretical and ethnographic explorations of neoliberalism’s impact on education. In his past research, Ajay Sharma has focused on representations of nature in science education, and classroom discourse in K-12 science classrooms from the perspectives of individual agency and equity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and Education\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2272811\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2272811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究调查了美国教师在全职返回课堂后,希望继续护理儿童的哺乳材料话语环境。使用批判女权主义的方法,我们采访了选择在学校哺乳或哺乳婴儿的教师父母。这项研究表明,美国的学校可能充斥着新父权制,这对教师家长来说是高度压迫的。此外,我们发现,对于哺乳期的教师父母来说,在脆弱的工作/生活平衡中,很少有话语策略可以使用,这些策略往往主要植根于高度个性化的、负责任的新自由主义女权主义话语,而这种话语严重不足,无法对学校中根深蒂固的新父权制构成任何严重挑战。关键词:女权主义;新父权制;教师披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1所有使用的名字都是假名,由参与者在最初的成员检查中自己选择2022年,一名举报人投诉监管不力的工厂存在细菌污染,导致美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对雅培公司进行调查,雅培公司占美国配方奶粉供应的40%左右(Schreiber Citation2023, 3月8日)。由此导致的全国配方奶粉短缺持续了2022年的大部分时间,供应链的影响一直持续到2023年。例如,Williams (Citation2012)和Oster (Citation2019)都指出,大多数关于哺乳的研究都存在偏见,因为有时间、空间和精力练习哺乳的女性通常有教育和经济资源,这标志着她们绝对享有特权,因此能够获得与没有哺乳的女性不同的选择。因此,几乎不可能在母乳喂养和非母乳喂养的婴儿的健康和受教育程度之间建立因果关系,因为父母拥有的高收入和教育水平将与儿童更好的短期和长期结果相关联,即使不哺乳。作者简介:kelsey Benson,美国乔治亚大学雅典分校教育理论与实践系博士研究生。凯尔西作为一名和平队志愿者在西非国家几内亚开始了她对教育的探索。回到美国后,她教了六年的初中特殊教育。她目前对女性主义理论和新自由主义的交叉点感兴趣。Ajay Sharma是美国乔治亚大学雅典分校教育理论与实践系教授。他目前的研究重点是新自由主义对教育影响的理论和民族志探索。在他过去的研究中,Ajay Sharma从个体代理和公平的角度关注自然在科学教育中的表现,以及K-12科学课堂中的课堂话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manifestations of neoliberal feminism in U.S. teacher lactation behaviours
ABSTRACTThis study investigates the material-discursive contexts available for lactation amongst U.S. teachers who wish to continue nursing [a] child(ren) upon returning full-time to the classroom. Using critical feminist methodologies, we interviewed teacher-parents who chose to lactate or nurse their infants while at school. The study suggests that schools in the United States might be rife with neo-patriarchy that is highly oppressive to teacher-parents. Further, we found that the few discursive strategies available to lactating teacher-parents to navigate a tenuous work/life balance tend to be largely rooted in the highly individualized, responsibilised discourse of neoliberal feminism that is woefully inadequate to pose any serious challenge to the entrenched neo-patriarchy in schools.KEYWORDS: Feminismneo-patriarchylactationteachers Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 All names used are pseudonyms, selected by participants themselves during initial rounds of member checking.2 In 2022, a whistleblower complaint about bacterial contamination at poorly regulated factories led to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigation of Abbott, a corporation responsible for approximately 40% of the U.S. formula supply (Schreiber Citation2023, March 8). The resulting nationwide formula shortage lasted for most of 2022, with continuing supply chain reverberations into 2023.3 The purported health benefits of lactation have been contested by some feminist researchers. For instance, Williams (Citation2012) and Oster (Citation2019) both point out that most studies of lactation are biassed by the fact that women who have the time, space, and energy to practise lactation typically have education and financial resources that mark them as categorically privileged and therefore able to access different choices than women who do not. Therefore it is almost impossible to establish a causal relationship between health and educational attainment outcomes of babies who are and are not breastfed, since the high levels of income and education possessed by parents would correlate with better short and long-term outcomes for children even independent of lactation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsKelsey BensonKelsey Benson is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Educational Theory and Practice, at the University of Georgia, Athens, United States of America. Kelsey began her foray into education as a Peace Corps Volunteer in the West African nation of Guinea. Upon returning to the United States, she taught middle grades Special Education for six years. She is currently interested in intersections of feminist theory and neoliberalism for her dissertation research.Ajay SharmaAjay Sharma is a professor in the Department of Educational Theory and Practice, at the University of Georgia, Athens, United States of America. His current research centres on theoretical and ethnographic explorations of neoliberalism’s impact on education. In his past research, Ajay Sharma has focused on representations of nature in science education, and classroom discourse in K-12 science classrooms from the perspectives of individual agency and equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender and Education
Gender and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Gender and Education grew out of feminist politics and a social justice agenda and is committed to developing multi-disciplinary and critical discussions of gender and education. The journal is particularly interested in the place of gender in relation to other key differences and seeks to further feminist knowledge, philosophies, theory, action and debate. The Editors are actively committed to making the journal an interactive platform that includes global perspectives on education, gender and culture. Submissions to the journal should examine and theorize the interrelated experiences of gendered subjects including women, girls, men, boys, and gender-diverse individuals. Papers should consider how gender shapes and is shaped by other social, cultural, discursive, affective and material dimensions of difference. Gender and Education expects articles to engage in feminist debate, to draw upon a range of theoretical frameworks and to go beyond simple descriptions. Education is interpreted in a broad sense to cover both formal and informal aspects, including pre-school, primary, and secondary education; families and youth cultures inside and outside schools; adult, community, further and higher education; vocational education and training; media education; and parental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信