走向中学学科系的类型学

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nick Gee, Abigail Parrish, Steven Puttick
{"title":"走向中学学科系的类型学","authors":"Nick Gee, Abigail Parrish, Steven Puttick","doi":"10.1080/13664530.2023.2258106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSubject departments are an increasingly important unit of analysis for research on schools and beginning teachers’ experiences. By analysing a practice-based typology of eight departmental types through an exploratory factor analysis of questionnaires completed by beginning teachers (n = 55), the authors refined the typology to four (hierarchical; open; self-promoting; divisive). Further exploration of this refined typology, through in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of six beginning teachers, allowed the authors to illustrate the departmental types in relation to their experiences. These findings highlight some of the ways in which new regimes of accountability and corporatisation are reshaping the ways in which departmental cultures are constructed and enacted. The beginning teachers in this study describe their responses and adaptations to their placement departments in ways that highlight opportunities for Initial Teacher Education partnerships to better anticipate and prepare beginning teachers for the departmentalised nature of their experiences.KEYWORDS: School departmentsculturedepartment leadershipdepartment typology Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNick GeeNick Gee is the Dean of Faculty at Bishop Grosseteste University in Lincoln.Abigail ParrishAbigail Parrish is a Lecturer in Education at the University of Sheffield and a former modern foreign languages teacher.Steven PuttickSteve Puttick is Associate Professor of Teacher Education at the Department of Education, University of Oxford, and Fellow of St Anne’s College.","PeriodicalId":46208,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a typology of secondary school subject departments\",\"authors\":\"Nick Gee, Abigail Parrish, Steven Puttick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13664530.2023.2258106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTSubject departments are an increasingly important unit of analysis for research on schools and beginning teachers’ experiences. By analysing a practice-based typology of eight departmental types through an exploratory factor analysis of questionnaires completed by beginning teachers (n = 55), the authors refined the typology to four (hierarchical; open; self-promoting; divisive). Further exploration of this refined typology, through in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of six beginning teachers, allowed the authors to illustrate the departmental types in relation to their experiences. These findings highlight some of the ways in which new regimes of accountability and corporatisation are reshaping the ways in which departmental cultures are constructed and enacted. The beginning teachers in this study describe their responses and adaptations to their placement departments in ways that highlight opportunities for Initial Teacher Education partnerships to better anticipate and prepare beginning teachers for the departmentalised nature of their experiences.KEYWORDS: School departmentsculturedepartment leadershipdepartment typology Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNick GeeNick Gee is the Dean of Faculty at Bishop Grosseteste University in Lincoln.Abigail ParrishAbigail Parrish is a Lecturer in Education at the University of Sheffield and a former modern foreign languages teacher.Steven PuttickSteve Puttick is Associate Professor of Teacher Education at the Department of Education, University of Oxford, and Fellow of St Anne’s College.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teacher Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teacher Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2258106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2258106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要学科系是学校和初任教师经验研究的重要分析单位。通过对初任教师(n = 55)完成的问卷进行探索性因素分析,作者分析了基于实践的八种院系类型的类型,将类型细化为四种(分层;开放;自我推销;分裂)。通过对六位初级教师的深入访谈,进一步探索了这一精致的类型学,使作者能够说明与他们的经验相关的部门类型。这些发现突出表明,新的问责制和公司化制度正在重塑部门文化的构建和制定方式。本研究中的初任教师描述了他们对安置部门的反应和适应,强调了初任教师教育合作伙伴关系的机会,以更好地预测和准备初任教师对其经历的部门化性质。关键词:院系文化院系领导院系类型学披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。nick Gee是林肯主教格罗斯泰斯特大学的教务长。阿比盖尔·帕里什是谢菲尔德大学教育学讲师,曾任现代外语教师。Steven Puttick,牛津大学教育系教师教育副教授,圣安妮学院研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a typology of secondary school subject departments
ABSTRACTSubject departments are an increasingly important unit of analysis for research on schools and beginning teachers’ experiences. By analysing a practice-based typology of eight departmental types through an exploratory factor analysis of questionnaires completed by beginning teachers (n = 55), the authors refined the typology to four (hierarchical; open; self-promoting; divisive). Further exploration of this refined typology, through in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of six beginning teachers, allowed the authors to illustrate the departmental types in relation to their experiences. These findings highlight some of the ways in which new regimes of accountability and corporatisation are reshaping the ways in which departmental cultures are constructed and enacted. The beginning teachers in this study describe their responses and adaptations to their placement departments in ways that highlight opportunities for Initial Teacher Education partnerships to better anticipate and prepare beginning teachers for the departmentalised nature of their experiences.KEYWORDS: School departmentsculturedepartment leadershipdepartment typology Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNick GeeNick Gee is the Dean of Faculty at Bishop Grosseteste University in Lincoln.Abigail ParrishAbigail Parrish is a Lecturer in Education at the University of Sheffield and a former modern foreign languages teacher.Steven PuttickSteve Puttick is Associate Professor of Teacher Education at the Department of Education, University of Oxford, and Fellow of St Anne’s College.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Development
Teacher Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Teacher Development is a fully refereed international journal publishing articles on all aspects of teachers" professional development. It acts as a forum for critical and reflective attention to practice in teacher development and aims thereby to contribute to the quality of professional development. The journal takes a "whole-career" view of teacher development, and work from both international and inter-professional perspectives is welcome. Articles may deal with teacher development in varying political and professional contexts, and may be in a variety of styles, in keeping with the diversity of activity in professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信