叶酸生物强化食品对农村妇女健康和支付意愿的影响:基于中国连接式随机对照试验--贝克尔-德格鲁特-马沙克实验的研究

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Agribusiness Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1002/agr.21858
Fen Liao, Yan Li, Ping Qing, Jie Feng, Anxu Wang, Jian Li, Junsheng Huo, Linjie Wang, Tong Chen, Jing Sun, Hongmei Mao
{"title":"叶酸生物强化食品对农村妇女健康和支付意愿的影响:基于中国连接式随机对照试验--贝克尔-德格鲁特-马沙克实验的研究","authors":"Fen Liao,&nbsp;Yan Li,&nbsp;Ping Qing,&nbsp;Jie Feng,&nbsp;Anxu Wang,&nbsp;Jian Li,&nbsp;Junsheng Huo,&nbsp;Linjie Wang,&nbsp;Tong Chen,&nbsp;Jing Sun,&nbsp;Hongmei Mao","doi":"10.1002/agr.21858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examined whether folate-fortified maize (FFM) improves the health of rural women of childbearing age and whether the health intervention is associated with the consumer willingness-to-pay (WTP) for FFM. First, a randomized single-blind FFM intervention trial was conducted in rural childbearing-aged women. Participants (<i>n</i> = 55) consumed one stalk of either FFM (treatment group) or ordinary maize (control group) daily. This dietary intervention lasted for 2 months, during which we assessed the participants' serum folate levels at baseline, mid stage (after 1 month), and final stage (after 2 months) to evaluate the health effect of FFM. We found that the serum folate level in the treatment group (13.31 ng/mL) was 3.40 ng/mL higher than that in the control group (9.91 ng/mL) in the final stage of the study. These findings suggest that regular dietary FFM intake significantly increased serum folate levels in rural Chinese women. Second, we further expanded our study by involving 181 local rural women with similar demographic characteristics to participate in a Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) bidding experiment to measure their WTPs for FFM. Results showed that local consumers were willing to pay 2.82 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per stalk of FFM, approximately 1.21 CNY higher than the price of ordinary maize. And women who participated in and completed the intervention trial had a higher preference for FFM during the evaluation. We provide evidence on the health improvement effect of biofortified foods and shed light on the associated consumer valuation and policy implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55544,"journal":{"name":"Agribusiness","volume":"39 S1","pages":"1458-1477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of folate biofortified food supplement on rural women's health and willingness-to-pay: A study based on a connected randomized controlled trial—Becker–DeGroot–Marschak experiment in China\",\"authors\":\"Fen Liao,&nbsp;Yan Li,&nbsp;Ping Qing,&nbsp;Jie Feng,&nbsp;Anxu Wang,&nbsp;Jian Li,&nbsp;Junsheng Huo,&nbsp;Linjie Wang,&nbsp;Tong Chen,&nbsp;Jing Sun,&nbsp;Hongmei Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agr.21858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examined whether folate-fortified maize (FFM) improves the health of rural women of childbearing age and whether the health intervention is associated with the consumer willingness-to-pay (WTP) for FFM. First, a randomized single-blind FFM intervention trial was conducted in rural childbearing-aged women. Participants (<i>n</i> = 55) consumed one stalk of either FFM (treatment group) or ordinary maize (control group) daily. This dietary intervention lasted for 2 months, during which we assessed the participants' serum folate levels at baseline, mid stage (after 1 month), and final stage (after 2 months) to evaluate the health effect of FFM. We found that the serum folate level in the treatment group (13.31 ng/mL) was 3.40 ng/mL higher than that in the control group (9.91 ng/mL) in the final stage of the study. These findings suggest that regular dietary FFM intake significantly increased serum folate levels in rural Chinese women. Second, we further expanded our study by involving 181 local rural women with similar demographic characteristics to participate in a Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) bidding experiment to measure their WTPs for FFM. Results showed that local consumers were willing to pay 2.82 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per stalk of FFM, approximately 1.21 CNY higher than the price of ordinary maize. And women who participated in and completed the intervention trial had a higher preference for FFM during the evaluation. We provide evidence on the health improvement effect of biofortified foods and shed light on the associated consumer valuation and policy implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agribusiness\",\"volume\":\"39 S1\",\"pages\":\"1458-1477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agribusiness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agr.21858\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agribusiness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agr.21858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了叶酸强化玉米(FFM)是否改善了农村育龄妇女的健康状况,以及健康干预是否与消费者对FFM的支付意愿(WTP)相关。首先,在农村育龄妇女中进行随机单盲FFM干预试验。参与者(n = 55)每天食用一根FFM玉米(处理组)或普通玉米(对照组)。这项饮食干预持续了2个月,在此期间,我们评估了参与者在基线、中期(1个月后)和末期(2个月后)的血清叶酸水平,以评估FFM对健康的影响。我们发现,在研究的最后阶段,治疗组血清叶酸水平(13.31 ng/mL)比对照组(9.91 ng/mL)高3.40 ng/mL。这些研究结果表明,在中国农村妇女中,定期食用FFM可显著提高血清叶酸水平。其次,我们进一步扩大了研究范围,选取了181名具有相似人口统计学特征的当地农村妇女,采用Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM)竞价实验来测量她们的FFM WTPs。结果表明,当地消费者愿意为每根玉米支付2.82元人民币,比普通玉米价格高出约1.21元人民币。参与并完成干预试验的妇女在评估时对FFM有更高的偏好。我们提供了生物强化食品改善健康效果的证据,并阐明了相关的消费者评价和政策实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of folate biofortified food supplement on rural women's health and willingness-to-pay: A study based on a connected randomized controlled trial—Becker–DeGroot–Marschak experiment in China

We examined whether folate-fortified maize (FFM) improves the health of rural women of childbearing age and whether the health intervention is associated with the consumer willingness-to-pay (WTP) for FFM. First, a randomized single-blind FFM intervention trial was conducted in rural childbearing-aged women. Participants (n = 55) consumed one stalk of either FFM (treatment group) or ordinary maize (control group) daily. This dietary intervention lasted for 2 months, during which we assessed the participants' serum folate levels at baseline, mid stage (after 1 month), and final stage (after 2 months) to evaluate the health effect of FFM. We found that the serum folate level in the treatment group (13.31 ng/mL) was 3.40 ng/mL higher than that in the control group (9.91 ng/mL) in the final stage of the study. These findings suggest that regular dietary FFM intake significantly increased serum folate levels in rural Chinese women. Second, we further expanded our study by involving 181 local rural women with similar demographic characteristics to participate in a Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) bidding experiment to measure their WTPs for FFM. Results showed that local consumers were willing to pay 2.82 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per stalk of FFM, approximately 1.21 CNY higher than the price of ordinary maize. And women who participated in and completed the intervention trial had a higher preference for FFM during the evaluation. We provide evidence on the health improvement effect of biofortified foods and shed light on the associated consumer valuation and policy implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agribusiness
Agribusiness 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Agribusiness: An International Journal publishes research that improves our understanding of how food systems work, how they are evolving, and how public and/or private actions affect the performance of the global agro-industrial complex. The journal focuses on the application of economic analysis to the organization and performance of firms and markets in industrial food systems. Subject matter areas include supply and demand analysis, industrial organization analysis, price and trade analysis, marketing, finance, and public policy analysis. International, cross-country comparative, and within-country studies are welcome. To facilitate research the journal’s Forum section, on an intermittent basis, offers commentary and reports on business policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信