为社区发展设计基本收入试点:社区关注的主要问题是什么?来自英格兰北部公民参与的证据

Neil Howard, Grace Gregory, Elliott A. Johnson, Cleo Goodman, Jonathan Coates, Ian Robson, Kate Pickett, Matthew T. Johnson
{"title":"为社区发展设计基本收入试点:社区关注的主要问题是什么?来自英格兰北部公民参与的证据","authors":"Neil Howard, Grace Gregory, Elliott A. Johnson, Cleo Goodman, Jonathan Coates, Ian Robson, Kate Pickett, Matthew T. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/26883597.2023.2269483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policymakers worldwide are realizing that traditional welfare systems need modernization. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, and with economic, ecological, and social crises intensifying, these systems are being exposed as inefficient, ineffective, and unjust. Policymakers have therefore begun exploring Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a potential alternative. This is leading to rising interest in basic income trials, with pilots proposed or in the pipeline in many countries, including Scotland and Wales. However, pilots are often designed without meaningful community participation, which raises significant ethical and practical concerns. Through a series of qualitative workshops in Jarrow, one of the most deprived areas in the UK and an archetypal target for “Leveling Up” policy, we explored and categorized local concerns, hopes, and suggestions for piloting basic income in the area. This article presents those findings and thereby builds the knowledge base around community perspectives on local basic income pilots.","PeriodicalId":208905,"journal":{"name":"Local Development & Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing basic income pilots for community development: What are the key community concerns? Evidence from citizen engagement in Northern England\",\"authors\":\"Neil Howard, Grace Gregory, Elliott A. Johnson, Cleo Goodman, Jonathan Coates, Ian Robson, Kate Pickett, Matthew T. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26883597.2023.2269483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policymakers worldwide are realizing that traditional welfare systems need modernization. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, and with economic, ecological, and social crises intensifying, these systems are being exposed as inefficient, ineffective, and unjust. Policymakers have therefore begun exploring Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a potential alternative. This is leading to rising interest in basic income trials, with pilots proposed or in the pipeline in many countries, including Scotland and Wales. However, pilots are often designed without meaningful community participation, which raises significant ethical and practical concerns. Through a series of qualitative workshops in Jarrow, one of the most deprived areas in the UK and an archetypal target for “Leveling Up” policy, we explored and categorized local concerns, hopes, and suggestions for piloting basic income in the area. This article presents those findings and thereby builds the knowledge base around community perspectives on local basic income pilots.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local Development & Society\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local Development & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2023.2269483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Development & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2023.2269483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的政策制定者都意识到,传统的福利制度需要现代化。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,随着经济、生态和社会危机的加剧,这些制度的低效、无效和不公正正在暴露出来。因此,政策制定者开始探索全民基本收入(UBI)作为潜在的替代方案。这导致人们对基本收入试点的兴趣日益浓厚,包括苏格兰和威尔士在内的许多国家已经提出或正在进行试点。然而,试点项目的设计往往没有真正的社区参与,这引起了重大的伦理和实际问题。贾罗是英国最贫困的地区之一,也是“升级”政策的典型目标,通过一系列定性研讨会,我们探索并分类了当地对在该地区试点基本收入的关注、希望和建议。本文介绍了这些发现,从而围绕社区对地方基本收入试点的看法建立了知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing basic income pilots for community development: What are the key community concerns? Evidence from citizen engagement in Northern England
Policymakers worldwide are realizing that traditional welfare systems need modernization. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, and with economic, ecological, and social crises intensifying, these systems are being exposed as inefficient, ineffective, and unjust. Policymakers have therefore begun exploring Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a potential alternative. This is leading to rising interest in basic income trials, with pilots proposed or in the pipeline in many countries, including Scotland and Wales. However, pilots are often designed without meaningful community participation, which raises significant ethical and practical concerns. Through a series of qualitative workshops in Jarrow, one of the most deprived areas in the UK and an archetypal target for “Leveling Up” policy, we explored and categorized local concerns, hopes, and suggestions for piloting basic income in the area. This article presents those findings and thereby builds the knowledge base around community perspectives on local basic income pilots.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信