COVID-19疫苗对COVID-19后病情患者的治疗效果:快速回顾

K.M. Saif-Ur-Rahman, Kavita Kothari, Corinna Sadlier, Frank Moriarty, Ani Movsisyan, Sean Whelan, Petek Eylul Taneri, Matthew Blair, Gordon Guyatt, Declan Devane
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗对COVID-19后病情患者的治疗效果:快速回顾","authors":"K.M. Saif-Ur-Rahman, Kavita Kothari, Corinna Sadlier, Frank Moriarty, Ani Movsisyan, Sean Whelan, Petek Eylul Taneri, Matthew Blair, Gordon Guyatt, Declan Devane","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13638.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<ns3:p><ns3:bold>Background:</ns3:bold> Vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has demonstrated reduced risk of hospitalisation and death against more recent variants of COVID-19. Some studies suggested improvements in patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) following vaccination. We systematically explored available evidence on the effect of COVID-19 vaccines on the treatment of people with PCC. <ns3:bold>Methods:</ns3:bold> We conducted a rapid review of the literature following systematic approaches. We searched Medline (OVID), EMBASE (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies of the effect of COVID-19 vaccines for treating people with PCC. Two independent review authors screened citations. Two review authors extracted data independently. We had planned to assess the risk of bias and use the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence if there were completed studies. <ns3:bold>Results:</ns3:bold> We identified two ongoing randomised controlled trials. Both trials examine the effectiveness of therapeutic vaccines on PCC. The anticipated completion date of the CIMAvax-EGFA trial is January 2023, and the completion date of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial is not stated. <ns3:bold>Conclusions:</ns3:bold> There is currently an absence of high‐quality evidence evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for treating people with post-COVID-19 condition. The absence of published studies and only two ongoing trials highlight the need for additional studies on the effectiveness of vaccines for PCC. We recommend that researchers consider PCC as per the definition provided by the World Health Organization and use the available core outcome set for PCC in deciding which outcomes to measure and report in the trials. <ns3:bold>PROPSERO registration:</ns3:bold> CRD42022330821 (20/06/2022)</ns3:p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of COVID-19 vaccines for the treatment of people with post-COVID-19 condition: a rapid review\",\"authors\":\"K.M. Saif-Ur-Rahman, Kavita Kothari, Corinna Sadlier, Frank Moriarty, Ani Movsisyan, Sean Whelan, Petek Eylul Taneri, Matthew Blair, Gordon Guyatt, Declan Devane\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13638.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<ns3:p><ns3:bold>Background:</ns3:bold> Vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has demonstrated reduced risk of hospitalisation and death against more recent variants of COVID-19. Some studies suggested improvements in patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) following vaccination. We systematically explored available evidence on the effect of COVID-19 vaccines on the treatment of people with PCC. <ns3:bold>Methods:</ns3:bold> We conducted a rapid review of the literature following systematic approaches. We searched Medline (OVID), EMBASE (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies of the effect of COVID-19 vaccines for treating people with PCC. Two independent review authors screened citations. Two review authors extracted data independently. We had planned to assess the risk of bias and use the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence if there were completed studies. <ns3:bold>Results:</ns3:bold> We identified two ongoing randomised controlled trials. Both trials examine the effectiveness of therapeutic vaccines on PCC. The anticipated completion date of the CIMAvax-EGFA trial is January 2023, and the completion date of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial is not stated. <ns3:bold>Conclusions:</ns3:bold> There is currently an absence of high‐quality evidence evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for treating people with post-COVID-19 condition. The absence of published studies and only two ongoing trials highlight the need for additional studies on the effectiveness of vaccines for PCC. We recommend that researchers consider PCC as per the definition provided by the World Health Organization and use the available core outcome set for PCC in deciding which outcomes to measure and report in the trials. <ns3:bold>PROPSERO registration:</ns3:bold> CRD42022330821 (20/06/2022)</ns3:p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13638.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13638.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疫苗接种已证明可降低针对最近的COVID-19变体的住院和死亡风险。一些研究表明,接种疫苗后covid -19后病情(PCC)有所改善。我们系统地探讨了COVID-19疫苗对PCC患者治疗效果的现有证据。方法:我们按照系统的方法对文献进行了快速回顾。我们检索了Medline (OVID)、EMBASE (Elsevier)、ClinicalTrials.gov和国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP),检索了关于COVID-19疫苗治疗PCC患者效果的随机试验、非随机试验、前后对照研究和中断时间序列研究。两位独立的综述作者筛选了引文。两位综述作者独立提取数据。我们计划评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法(分级推荐、评估、发展和评价)来评估已完成研究的证据的确定性。结果:我们确定了两项正在进行的随机对照试验。两项试验都检验了治疗性疫苗对PCC的有效性。CIMAvax-EGFA试验的预期完成日期为2023年1月,COVID-19 mRNA疫苗试验的完成日期尚未确定。结论:目前缺乏高质量的证据来评估COVID-19疫苗治疗COVID-19后疾病患者的有效性。缺乏已发表的研究和只有两项正在进行的试验突出表明需要对PCC疫苗的有效性进行更多的研究。我们建议研究人员根据世界卫生组织提供的定义来考虑PCC,并使用PCC的可用核心结果集来决定在试验中测量和报告哪些结果。PROPSERO注册:CRD42022330821 (20/06/2022)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of COVID-19 vaccines for the treatment of people with post-COVID-19 condition: a rapid review
Background: Vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has demonstrated reduced risk of hospitalisation and death against more recent variants of COVID-19. Some studies suggested improvements in patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) following vaccination. We systematically explored available evidence on the effect of COVID-19 vaccines on the treatment of people with PCC. Methods: We conducted a rapid review of the literature following systematic approaches. We searched Medline (OVID), EMBASE (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies of the effect of COVID-19 vaccines for treating people with PCC. Two independent review authors screened citations. Two review authors extracted data independently. We had planned to assess the risk of bias and use the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence if there were completed studies. Results: We identified two ongoing randomised controlled trials. Both trials examine the effectiveness of therapeutic vaccines on PCC. The anticipated completion date of the CIMAvax-EGFA trial is January 2023, and the completion date of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial is not stated. Conclusions: There is currently an absence of high‐quality evidence evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for treating people with post-COVID-19 condition. The absence of published studies and only two ongoing trials highlight the need for additional studies on the effectiveness of vaccines for PCC. We recommend that researchers consider PCC as per the definition provided by the World Health Organization and use the available core outcome set for PCC in deciding which outcomes to measure and report in the trials. PROPSERO registration: CRD42022330821 (20/06/2022)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信