科学作为北极土地利用问题的仲裁者:历史评价

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Urban Wråkberg
{"title":"科学作为北极土地利用问题的仲裁者:历史评价","authors":"Urban Wråkberg","doi":"10.18254/s207987840027803-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article offers a historical review of the practice of prioritizing scientific advice in land-use policies of the Arctic. It uses the high-arctic Svalbard archipelago as its main case study. It articulates the need for historians to contribute insights into the ways scientific communities have set much of the international agenda of Arctic and Antarctic matters over the last century. From a cultural heritage standpoint, today’s situation on Svalbard illustrates some problems of the currently widely accepted ideas of global (Arctic) governance. The author raises the question, according some points of view, whether the idea of Circumarctic, globally governed by scientific diplomacy, will not turn into something “sectorally” divided — a future that, as Arctic historians know, has a past in Arctic geopolitics from which lessons can be learned.","PeriodicalId":51929,"journal":{"name":"Istoriya-Elektronnyi Nauchno-Obrazovatelnyi Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science as Arbitrator on Arctic Land-Use Issues: а Historical Appraisal\",\"authors\":\"Urban Wråkberg\",\"doi\":\"10.18254/s207987840027803-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article offers a historical review of the practice of prioritizing scientific advice in land-use policies of the Arctic. It uses the high-arctic Svalbard archipelago as its main case study. It articulates the need for historians to contribute insights into the ways scientific communities have set much of the international agenda of Arctic and Antarctic matters over the last century. From a cultural heritage standpoint, today’s situation on Svalbard illustrates some problems of the currently widely accepted ideas of global (Arctic) governance. The author raises the question, according some points of view, whether the idea of Circumarctic, globally governed by scientific diplomacy, will not turn into something “sectorally” divided — a future that, as Arctic historians know, has a past in Arctic geopolitics from which lessons can be learned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Istoriya-Elektronnyi Nauchno-Obrazovatelnyi Zhurnal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Istoriya-Elektronnyi Nauchno-Obrazovatelnyi Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840027803-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istoriya-Elektronnyi Nauchno-Obrazovatelnyi Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840027803-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章对北极土地使用政策中优先考虑科学建议的做法进行了历史回顾。它以高北极的斯瓦尔巴群岛为主要案例研究。它清楚地表明,历史学家有必要深入了解科学界在上个世纪为北极和南极问题制定国际议程的方式。从文化遗产的角度来看,斯瓦尔巴群岛今天的情况说明了目前广泛接受的全球(北极)治理理念的一些问题。根据某些观点,作者提出了一个问题,即由科学外交在全球范围内管理的环北极的想法是否会变成某种“部门”分裂的东西——正如北极历史学家所知,未来在北极地缘政治方面有一个过去,可以从中吸取教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science as Arbitrator on Arctic Land-Use Issues: а Historical Appraisal
The article offers a historical review of the practice of prioritizing scientific advice in land-use policies of the Arctic. It uses the high-arctic Svalbard archipelago as its main case study. It articulates the need for historians to contribute insights into the ways scientific communities have set much of the international agenda of Arctic and Antarctic matters over the last century. From a cultural heritage standpoint, today’s situation on Svalbard illustrates some problems of the currently widely accepted ideas of global (Arctic) governance. The author raises the question, according some points of view, whether the idea of Circumarctic, globally governed by scientific diplomacy, will not turn into something “sectorally” divided — a future that, as Arctic historians know, has a past in Arctic geopolitics from which lessons can be learned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信