化学品可持续发展战略

StoffR Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21552/stoffr/2023/3/3
S. Galler, M. Wimmer
{"title":"化学品可持续发展战略","authors":"S. Galler, M. Wimmer","doi":"10.21552/stoffr/2023/3/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The revision of the REACH Regulation was initiated by the Commission´s Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) in 2020, which is a part of the European Green Deal. Next to other innovative elements, the CSS introduced the concept of “Safe and sustainable by design (SSbD)” for chemicals, which aims at the transition of industry towards the production and use of more environmentally sustainable chemicals. The integration of environmental sustainability into the European regulatory framework of chemicals is not trivial, as it requires to taking not only the inherent properties of chemicals into account, but also the underlying chemical manufacturing processes. While the CSS envisaged the revision of REACH as a key implementation measure, it became gradually clear, that the European Commission did not plan to include environmental sustainability into the envisaged proposal for a revision of the REACH Regulation, but to focus the revision solely on widening safety aspects, while leaving the implementation of environmental sustainability requirements to other instruments, particularly the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). The European chemicals risk management might thus be governed by a rather fragmented regulatory framework, building on different European legal instruments, including the future REACH Regulation and the ESPR as major elements. In addition, within the innovation and research policy, the SSbD framework for chemicals is currently being developed by the Commission, which will have repercussions on the implementation of the two above-mentioned regulations. The development of these instruments will thrive the chemical industry towards greater environmental sustainability. However, there is a risk that inconsistencies and incoherence between these comprehensive and complex pieces of legislation that were developed independently of each other may hamper their respective implementation. This article assesses potential problems for the implementation of SSbD in practice due to these upcoming regulatory inconsistencies.","PeriodicalId":494632,"journal":{"name":"StoffR","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability\",\"authors\":\"S. Galler, M. Wimmer\",\"doi\":\"10.21552/stoffr/2023/3/3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The revision of the REACH Regulation was initiated by the Commission´s Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) in 2020, which is a part of the European Green Deal. Next to other innovative elements, the CSS introduced the concept of “Safe and sustainable by design (SSbD)” for chemicals, which aims at the transition of industry towards the production and use of more environmentally sustainable chemicals. The integration of environmental sustainability into the European regulatory framework of chemicals is not trivial, as it requires to taking not only the inherent properties of chemicals into account, but also the underlying chemical manufacturing processes. While the CSS envisaged the revision of REACH as a key implementation measure, it became gradually clear, that the European Commission did not plan to include environmental sustainability into the envisaged proposal for a revision of the REACH Regulation, but to focus the revision solely on widening safety aspects, while leaving the implementation of environmental sustainability requirements to other instruments, particularly the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). The European chemicals risk management might thus be governed by a rather fragmented regulatory framework, building on different European legal instruments, including the future REACH Regulation and the ESPR as major elements. In addition, within the innovation and research policy, the SSbD framework for chemicals is currently being developed by the Commission, which will have repercussions on the implementation of the two above-mentioned regulations. The development of these instruments will thrive the chemical industry towards greater environmental sustainability. However, there is a risk that inconsistencies and incoherence between these comprehensive and complex pieces of legislation that were developed independently of each other may hamper their respective implementation. This article assesses potential problems for the implementation of SSbD in practice due to these upcoming regulatory inconsistencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":494632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"StoffR\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"StoffR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21552/stoffr/2023/3/3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"StoffR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/stoffr/2023/3/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

REACH法规的修订是由欧盟委员会的化学品可持续发展战略(CSS)于2020年启动的,该战略是欧洲绿色协议的一部分。除其他创新元素外,CSS还为化学品引入了“安全可持续设计(SSbD)”的概念,旨在使工业向生产和使用更具环境可持续性的化学品过渡。将环境可持续性纳入欧洲化学品管理框架并非易事,因为它不仅需要考虑化学品的固有特性,还需要考虑潜在的化学品制造过程。虽然CSS设想将REACH的修订作为一项关键的实施措施,但逐渐清楚的是,欧盟委员会并不打算将环境可持续性纳入REACH法规修订的设想提案中,而是将修订的重点放在扩大安全方面,而将环境可持续性要求的实施留给其他工具,特别是可持续产品生态设计法规(ESPR)。因此,欧洲化学品风险管理可能由一个相当分散的监管框架来管理,该框架建立在不同的欧洲法律文书之上,包括未来的REACH法规和ESPR作为主要要素。此外,在创新和研究政策范围内,委员会目前正在制定化学品的SSbD框架,这将对上述两项条例的执行产生影响。这些仪器的发展将使化学工业朝着更大的环境可持续性发展。但是,这些相互独立制定的全面和复杂的立法之间存在着不一致和不连贯的危险,这可能妨碍它们各自的执行。本文评估了由于这些即将到来的法规不一致而在实践中实施SSbD的潜在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability
The revision of the REACH Regulation was initiated by the Commission´s Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) in 2020, which is a part of the European Green Deal. Next to other innovative elements, the CSS introduced the concept of “Safe and sustainable by design (SSbD)” for chemicals, which aims at the transition of industry towards the production and use of more environmentally sustainable chemicals. The integration of environmental sustainability into the European regulatory framework of chemicals is not trivial, as it requires to taking not only the inherent properties of chemicals into account, but also the underlying chemical manufacturing processes. While the CSS envisaged the revision of REACH as a key implementation measure, it became gradually clear, that the European Commission did not plan to include environmental sustainability into the envisaged proposal for a revision of the REACH Regulation, but to focus the revision solely on widening safety aspects, while leaving the implementation of environmental sustainability requirements to other instruments, particularly the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). The European chemicals risk management might thus be governed by a rather fragmented regulatory framework, building on different European legal instruments, including the future REACH Regulation and the ESPR as major elements. In addition, within the innovation and research policy, the SSbD framework for chemicals is currently being developed by the Commission, which will have repercussions on the implementation of the two above-mentioned regulations. The development of these instruments will thrive the chemical industry towards greater environmental sustainability. However, there is a risk that inconsistencies and incoherence between these comprehensive and complex pieces of legislation that were developed independently of each other may hamper their respective implementation. This article assesses potential problems for the implementation of SSbD in practice due to these upcoming regulatory inconsistencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信