动物与我们,我们也是动物

Vojko Strahovnik
{"title":"动物与我们,我们也是动物","authors":"Vojko Strahovnik","doi":"10.21860/j.14.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of animal ethics in philosophy has seen a variety of approaches since its recent resurgence. In this discussion, J. M. Coetzee’s book The Lives of Animals serves as a focal point. Two contrasting responses to Coetzee’s work are presented. The first response takes a traditional approach to the animal question, which aims to prevent suffering, improve animal welfare, and reject speciesism. The second response is more radical and emphasizes that the animal question is not just about animals, but also about us, human animals. This approach helpfully highlights the limitations of rational, philosophical thought when it comes to understanding the complexity of the animal question and ascribes the limitation to the phenomenon of the difficulty of reality.","PeriodicalId":250910,"journal":{"name":"Jahr - European journal of bioethics","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animals and Us, Us as Animals\",\"authors\":\"Vojko Strahovnik\",\"doi\":\"10.21860/j.14.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of animal ethics in philosophy has seen a variety of approaches since its recent resurgence. In this discussion, J. M. Coetzee’s book The Lives of Animals serves as a focal point. Two contrasting responses to Coetzee’s work are presented. The first response takes a traditional approach to the animal question, which aims to prevent suffering, improve animal welfare, and reject speciesism. The second response is more radical and emphasizes that the animal question is not just about animals, but also about us, human animals. This approach helpfully highlights the limitations of rational, philosophical thought when it comes to understanding the complexity of the animal question and ascribes the limitation to the phenomenon of the difficulty of reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jahr - European journal of bioethics\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jahr - European journal of bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21860/j.14.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahr - European journal of bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21860/j.14.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哲学中的动物伦理领域自最近复苏以来出现了各种各样的方法。在这个讨论中,J. M. Coetzee的书《动物的生活》是一个焦点。对库切的工作提出了两种截然不同的回应。第一种回应是采用传统的方法来解决动物问题,其目的是防止痛苦,改善动物福利,并拒绝物种歧视。第二种回答更为激进,强调动物问题不仅与动物有关,也与我们人类有关。当涉及到理解动物问题的复杂性时,这种方法有助于强调理性和哲学思想的局限性,并将这种局限性归因于现实的困难现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Animals and Us, Us as Animals
The field of animal ethics in philosophy has seen a variety of approaches since its recent resurgence. In this discussion, J. M. Coetzee’s book The Lives of Animals serves as a focal point. Two contrasting responses to Coetzee’s work are presented. The first response takes a traditional approach to the animal question, which aims to prevent suffering, improve animal welfare, and reject speciesism. The second response is more radical and emphasizes that the animal question is not just about animals, but also about us, human animals. This approach helpfully highlights the limitations of rational, philosophical thought when it comes to understanding the complexity of the animal question and ascribes the limitation to the phenomenon of the difficulty of reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信