Bruno S. Silva, Beatriz Ferraz, Filipa Correia, Maria Inês Costa, Maria Esteves Brandão, Nuno Cortesão
{"title":"葡萄牙肺科医生肺部超声使用情况调查","authors":"Bruno S. Silva, Beatriz Ferraz, Filipa Correia, Maria Inês Costa, Maria Esteves Brandão, Nuno Cortesão","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa1817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> Lung ultrasound (LUS) performed by non-radiologist doctors has evolved over the last few decades, placing it as a useful diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring bedside tool in patients with respiratory disease. Despite its proven clinical applications, LUS training has not been standardized in Portugal. <b>Objetctives:</b> To characterize LUS learning processes and clinical usage amongst portuguese pulmonologists as well as to assess future needs. <b>Methods:</b> From August to November 2022 an online survey was sent to all members of the Portuguese Pulmonology Society. Degrees of confidence were assessed through Likert scales. Pearson’s chi-squared test and non-parametric tests were used. Outcomes were considered statistically significant if the probability of error was below 5% (p < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> 114 valid answers were obtained. Most responders (81%) had LUS training and 22% had attended other ultrasound-related courses. The majority had an ultrasound machine available. However, only 17% performed LUS > 3 times per week. Overall confidence in LUS usage for diagnostic purpose (median: 7/10), disease monitoring (median: 7/10) and support of invasive procedures (median: 8/10) were high. There was a significant relation between higher levels of confidence and regularly attending LUS courses and performing LUS > 3 times per week. The main reasons preventing regular use of LUS were availability/cost of courses, availability/cost of equipment and lack of time. <b>Conclusions:</b> Physician`s confidence degree on ultrasound utility is related to regular LUS training as well as regular usage. Costs involved with LUS training hamper its wider use.","PeriodicalId":23440,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey on lung ultrasound usage by portuguese pulmonologists\",\"authors\":\"Bruno S. Silva, Beatriz Ferraz, Filipa Correia, Maria Inês Costa, Maria Esteves Brandão, Nuno Cortesão\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa1817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<b>Introduction:</b> Lung ultrasound (LUS) performed by non-radiologist doctors has evolved over the last few decades, placing it as a useful diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring bedside tool in patients with respiratory disease. Despite its proven clinical applications, LUS training has not been standardized in Portugal. <b>Objetctives:</b> To characterize LUS learning processes and clinical usage amongst portuguese pulmonologists as well as to assess future needs. <b>Methods:</b> From August to November 2022 an online survey was sent to all members of the Portuguese Pulmonology Society. Degrees of confidence were assessed through Likert scales. Pearson’s chi-squared test and non-parametric tests were used. Outcomes were considered statistically significant if the probability of error was below 5% (p < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> 114 valid answers were obtained. Most responders (81%) had LUS training and 22% had attended other ultrasound-related courses. The majority had an ultrasound machine available. However, only 17% performed LUS > 3 times per week. Overall confidence in LUS usage for diagnostic purpose (median: 7/10), disease monitoring (median: 7/10) and support of invasive procedures (median: 8/10) were high. There was a significant relation between higher levels of confidence and regularly attending LUS courses and performing LUS > 3 times per week. The main reasons preventing regular use of LUS were availability/cost of courses, availability/cost of equipment and lack of time. <b>Conclusions:</b> Physician`s confidence degree on ultrasound utility is related to regular LUS training as well as regular usage. Costs involved with LUS training hamper its wider use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa1817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa1817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survey on lung ultrasound usage by portuguese pulmonologists
Introduction: Lung ultrasound (LUS) performed by non-radiologist doctors has evolved over the last few decades, placing it as a useful diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring bedside tool in patients with respiratory disease. Despite its proven clinical applications, LUS training has not been standardized in Portugal. Objetctives: To characterize LUS learning processes and clinical usage amongst portuguese pulmonologists as well as to assess future needs. Methods: From August to November 2022 an online survey was sent to all members of the Portuguese Pulmonology Society. Degrees of confidence were assessed through Likert scales. Pearson’s chi-squared test and non-parametric tests were used. Outcomes were considered statistically significant if the probability of error was below 5% (p < 0.05). Results: 114 valid answers were obtained. Most responders (81%) had LUS training and 22% had attended other ultrasound-related courses. The majority had an ultrasound machine available. However, only 17% performed LUS > 3 times per week. Overall confidence in LUS usage for diagnostic purpose (median: 7/10), disease monitoring (median: 7/10) and support of invasive procedures (median: 8/10) were high. There was a significant relation between higher levels of confidence and regularly attending LUS courses and performing LUS > 3 times per week. The main reasons preventing regular use of LUS were availability/cost of courses, availability/cost of equipment and lack of time. Conclusions: Physician`s confidence degree on ultrasound utility is related to regular LUS training as well as regular usage. Costs involved with LUS training hamper its wider use.
UltrasoundRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound is the official journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), a multidisciplinary, charitable society comprising radiologists, obstetricians, sonographers, physicists and veterinarians amongst others.