国家水资源政策和水资源管理:关于坎塔雷拉制度农村背景的思考

Q4 Social Sciences
Rafael Eduardo Chiodi
{"title":"国家水资源政策和水资源管理:关于坎塔雷拉制度农村背景的思考","authors":"Rafael Eduardo Chiodi","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The National Water Resources Policy established foundations and instruments for the management of water resources in Brazil. Despite being considered one of the most advanced internationally, its effectiveness is questioned for water management in rural contexts where small users predominate. The article presents elements of water management conducted by rural landowners, seeking to analyze how these elements approach or distance themselves from the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy. For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 151 rural landowners who use water resources in the context of the supply sources of the Cantareira Water Production System. The results indicate that the water sources accessed by users are the central reference that supports decisions on local water management, which distances itself from the watershed as a management unit, as proposed by law. Not based on a scientific conception, users mobilize specific indicators to determine the quality of the water consumed. Perceptions of the private domain and common good surrounding water sources do not fully align with the understanding of water as a public good. Furthermore, the notion of free access to and use of water also distances itself from any intention to charge for water in rural areas. It is concluded that the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy are not able to promote the management of water resources at the level of small sources and users, and that the perceptions and management practices of these users are far from what is established by law. The objective of the article is to present elements of water management conducted by rural landowners, seeking to analyze how these elements approach or distance themselves from the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy. Method/design/approach: The research is of a qualitative nature, of a descriptive nature, having been carried out empirical research. For the empirical research, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 151 rural landowners who use water resources in the context of the supply sources of the Cantareira Water Production System. Results and conclusion: The results indicate that the water sources accessed by users are the central reference that supports decisions on local water management, which distances itself from the hydrographic basin as a management unit, as proposed by law. Not based on a scientific conception, users mobilize specific indicators to determine the quality of the water consumed. Perceptions of the private domain and common good surrounding water sources do not fully align with the understanding of water as a public good. Furthermore, the notion of free access to and use of water also distances itself from any intention to charge for water in rural areas. Research implications: From the analysis, it is highlighted that the fundamentals and official instruments of water resources management cannot influence the water management that occurs at the level of small rural users. The main implication of the study is to stimulate reflection on the need to build a policy that takes into account elements of local water management, seeking full management of water resources. Originality/value: The study seeks to contribute to the improvement of water resources management, in terms of local management aspects. The ways of acting of rural landowners need to be recognized, understood and valued, so it will be possible to promote sustainable water management in one of the most critical contexts for water security in the country.","PeriodicalId":38210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The National Water Resources Policy and Water Management: Considerations about the Rural Context of the Cantareira System\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Eduardo Chiodi\",\"doi\":\"10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The National Water Resources Policy established foundations and instruments for the management of water resources in Brazil. Despite being considered one of the most advanced internationally, its effectiveness is questioned for water management in rural contexts where small users predominate. The article presents elements of water management conducted by rural landowners, seeking to analyze how these elements approach or distance themselves from the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy. For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 151 rural landowners who use water resources in the context of the supply sources of the Cantareira Water Production System. The results indicate that the water sources accessed by users are the central reference that supports decisions on local water management, which distances itself from the watershed as a management unit, as proposed by law. Not based on a scientific conception, users mobilize specific indicators to determine the quality of the water consumed. Perceptions of the private domain and common good surrounding water sources do not fully align with the understanding of water as a public good. Furthermore, the notion of free access to and use of water also distances itself from any intention to charge for water in rural areas. It is concluded that the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy are not able to promote the management of water resources at the level of small sources and users, and that the perceptions and management practices of these users are far from what is established by law. The objective of the article is to present elements of water management conducted by rural landowners, seeking to analyze how these elements approach or distance themselves from the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy. Method/design/approach: The research is of a qualitative nature, of a descriptive nature, having been carried out empirical research. For the empirical research, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 151 rural landowners who use water resources in the context of the supply sources of the Cantareira Water Production System. Results and conclusion: The results indicate that the water sources accessed by users are the central reference that supports decisions on local water management, which distances itself from the hydrographic basin as a management unit, as proposed by law. Not based on a scientific conception, users mobilize specific indicators to determine the quality of the water consumed. Perceptions of the private domain and common good surrounding water sources do not fully align with the understanding of water as a public good. Furthermore, the notion of free access to and use of water also distances itself from any intention to charge for water in rural areas. Research implications: From the analysis, it is highlighted that the fundamentals and official instruments of water resources management cannot influence the water management that occurs at the level of small rural users. The main implication of the study is to stimulate reflection on the need to build a policy that takes into account elements of local water management, seeking full management of water resources. Originality/value: The study seeks to contribute to the improvement of water resources management, in terms of local management aspects. The ways of acting of rural landowners need to be recognized, understood and valued, so it will be possible to promote sustainable water management in one of the most critical contexts for water security in the country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:《国家水资源政策》为巴西的水资源管理奠定了基础和手段。尽管被认为是国际上最先进的方法之一,但它在小用户占主导地位的农村地区的水管理方面的有效性受到质疑。本文介绍了农村土地所有者进行的水管理的要素,试图分析这些要素如何接近或远离国家水资源政策的基础和工具。为此目的,对151名农村土地所有者进行了半结构化访谈,这些土地所有者在Cantareira水生产系统供应来源的背景下使用水资源。结果表明,用户获取的水源是支持当地水管理决策的中心参考,根据法律规定,作为一个管理单位,它与流域保持距离。不是基于科学概念,用户调动具体指标来确定所消耗的水的质量。对水资源的私人领域和公共利益的看法与对水作为公共利益的理解并不完全一致。此外,免费获取和使用水的概念也与在农村地区收取水费的任何意图相去甚远。结论是,国家水资源政策的基础和手段无法促进小水源和用户一级的水资源管理,这些用户的观念和管理做法与法律所规定的相距甚远。本文的目的是介绍农村土地所有者进行的水管理的要素,试图分析这些要素如何接近或远离国家水资源政策的基础和工具。方法/设计/方法:该研究是定性的,描述性的,已经进行了实证研究。在实证研究中,我们对151名在Cantareira水生产系统供应来源的背景下使用水资源的农村土地所有者进行了半结构化访谈。结果和结论:结果表明,用户获取的水源是支持当地水资源管理决策的中心参考,根据法律规定,当地水资源管理作为一个管理单位与水文盆地保持距离。不是基于科学概念,用户调动具体指标来确定所消耗的水的质量。对水资源的私人领域和公共利益的看法与对水作为公共利益的理解并不完全一致。此外,免费获取和使用水的概念也与在农村地区收取水费的任何意图相去甚远。研究影响:从分析中可以看出,水资源管理的基本原则和官方手段不能影响农村小用户一级的水管理。这项研究的主要含义是促使人们思考需要制定一项考虑到地方水管理因素的政策,寻求对水资源的充分管理。原创性/价值:本研究力求在地方管理方面促进水资源管理的改善。农村土地所有者的行动方式需要得到承认、理解和重视,这样才有可能在该国水安全最关键的环境之一中促进可持续的水管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The National Water Resources Policy and Water Management: Considerations about the Rural Context of the Cantareira System
Purpose: The National Water Resources Policy established foundations and instruments for the management of water resources in Brazil. Despite being considered one of the most advanced internationally, its effectiveness is questioned for water management in rural contexts where small users predominate. The article presents elements of water management conducted by rural landowners, seeking to analyze how these elements approach or distance themselves from the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy. For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 151 rural landowners who use water resources in the context of the supply sources of the Cantareira Water Production System. The results indicate that the water sources accessed by users are the central reference that supports decisions on local water management, which distances itself from the watershed as a management unit, as proposed by law. Not based on a scientific conception, users mobilize specific indicators to determine the quality of the water consumed. Perceptions of the private domain and common good surrounding water sources do not fully align with the understanding of water as a public good. Furthermore, the notion of free access to and use of water also distances itself from any intention to charge for water in rural areas. It is concluded that the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy are not able to promote the management of water resources at the level of small sources and users, and that the perceptions and management practices of these users are far from what is established by law. The objective of the article is to present elements of water management conducted by rural landowners, seeking to analyze how these elements approach or distance themselves from the foundations and instruments of the National Water Resources Policy. Method/design/approach: The research is of a qualitative nature, of a descriptive nature, having been carried out empirical research. For the empirical research, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 151 rural landowners who use water resources in the context of the supply sources of the Cantareira Water Production System. Results and conclusion: The results indicate that the water sources accessed by users are the central reference that supports decisions on local water management, which distances itself from the hydrographic basin as a management unit, as proposed by law. Not based on a scientific conception, users mobilize specific indicators to determine the quality of the water consumed. Perceptions of the private domain and common good surrounding water sources do not fully align with the understanding of water as a public good. Furthermore, the notion of free access to and use of water also distances itself from any intention to charge for water in rural areas. Research implications: From the analysis, it is highlighted that the fundamentals and official instruments of water resources management cannot influence the water management that occurs at the level of small rural users. The main implication of the study is to stimulate reflection on the need to build a policy that takes into account elements of local water management, seeking full management of water resources. Originality/value: The study seeks to contribute to the improvement of water resources management, in terms of local management aspects. The ways of acting of rural landowners need to be recognized, understood and valued, so it will be possible to promote sustainable water management in one of the most critical contexts for water security in the country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信