资讯及通讯科技使用因素对韩国和香港学生阅读能力的影响比较

ZHANG Mi, Sang-Jun HAN, Gyun HEO
{"title":"资讯及通讯科技使用因素对韩国和香港学生阅读能力的影响比较","authors":"ZHANG Mi, Sang-Jun HAN, Gyun HEO","doi":"10.13000/jfmse.2023.35.3.625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the PISA 2018 data, this paper aims to explore the impact of the variable of ICT use in the PISA test on students\" reading literacy and the differences between Korea and Hong Kong. Three questions need to be explored, 1. What are the differences in ICT use between students in Korea and Hong Kong? 2. What is the relationship between ICT use and reading literacy in Korea and Hong Kong? 3. What is the impact of ICT use on reading literacy in Korea and Hong Kong? In this paper, independent sample t-test, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were used as the research methods. (1) The means of most variables were greater in Hong Kong than in Korea, and only ICT application in the classroom (ICTCLASS) was greater in Korea than in Hong Kong; except for ICT availability at home (ICTHOME), all 10 variables were significantly different between the two regions. (2) In the correlation analysis, students in both regions performed well on the variables related to ICT interest and perception, and all three variables, INTICT, COMPICT, and AUTICT, were positively and significantly related to reading literacy. (3) In the multiple regression analysis, both Korean and Hong Kong students showed negative effects on the variables of ICT use in school, social ICT use, and ICT availability in school, and positive effects on the other variables, but Hong Kong students also showed negative effects on the variable of ICT availability at home. Through this analysis, this paper concludes that the focus of improving reading literacy is not on investing more budget to increase ICT applications, but on the need to increase young people\"s interest and perception of ICT, and that teachers and parents are essential in guiding ICT applications.","PeriodicalId":496496,"journal":{"name":"Su'san haeyang gyoyug yeon'gu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Effects of ICT Using Factors on Reading Literacy among Korean and Hong Kong Students\",\"authors\":\"ZHANG Mi, Sang-Jun HAN, Gyun HEO\",\"doi\":\"10.13000/jfmse.2023.35.3.625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the PISA 2018 data, this paper aims to explore the impact of the variable of ICT use in the PISA test on students\\\" reading literacy and the differences between Korea and Hong Kong. Three questions need to be explored, 1. What are the differences in ICT use between students in Korea and Hong Kong? 2. What is the relationship between ICT use and reading literacy in Korea and Hong Kong? 3. What is the impact of ICT use on reading literacy in Korea and Hong Kong? In this paper, independent sample t-test, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were used as the research methods. (1) The means of most variables were greater in Hong Kong than in Korea, and only ICT application in the classroom (ICTCLASS) was greater in Korea than in Hong Kong; except for ICT availability at home (ICTHOME), all 10 variables were significantly different between the two regions. (2) In the correlation analysis, students in both regions performed well on the variables related to ICT interest and perception, and all three variables, INTICT, COMPICT, and AUTICT, were positively and significantly related to reading literacy. (3) In the multiple regression analysis, both Korean and Hong Kong students showed negative effects on the variables of ICT use in school, social ICT use, and ICT availability in school, and positive effects on the other variables, but Hong Kong students also showed negative effects on the variable of ICT availability at home. Through this analysis, this paper concludes that the focus of improving reading literacy is not on investing more budget to increase ICT applications, but on the need to increase young people\\\"s interest and perception of ICT, and that teachers and parents are essential in guiding ICT applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Su'san haeyang gyoyug yeon'gu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Su'san haeyang gyoyug yeon'gu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2023.35.3.625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Su'san haeyang gyoyug yeon'gu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2023.35.3.625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于2018年PISA数据,本文旨在探讨PISA测试中ICT使用变量对学生阅读素养的影响以及韩国和香港的差异。有三个问题需要探讨:1。韩国和香港学生在使用资讯及通讯科技方面有何不同?2. 在韩国和香港,资讯及通讯科技的使用与阅读能力有何关系?3.资讯及通讯科技的使用对韩国和香港的阅读能力有何影响?本文采用独立样本t检验、相关分析和多元回归分析作为研究方法。(1)大多数变量的均值在香港大于韩国,只有ICT在课堂上的应用(ICTCLASS)在韩国大于香港;除家庭信息通信技术可用性(ICTHOME)外,所有10个变量在两个地区之间均存在显著差异。(2)在相关分析中,两地学生在ICT兴趣和感知相关变量上表现良好,且INTICT、COMPICT和AUTICT三个变量与阅读素养均呈显著正相关。(3)在多元回归分析中,韩国学生和香港学生在学校信息通信技术使用、社会信息通信技术使用和学校信息通信技术可用性变量上均表现出负向影响,在其他变量上表现出正向影响,但香港学生在家庭信息通信技术可用性变量上也表现出负向影响。通过这一分析,本文得出结论,提高阅读能力的重点不是投入更多的预算来增加ICT应用,而是需要提高年轻人对ICT的兴趣和认知,教师和家长在指导ICT应用方面至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Effects of ICT Using Factors on Reading Literacy among Korean and Hong Kong Students
Based on the PISA 2018 data, this paper aims to explore the impact of the variable of ICT use in the PISA test on students" reading literacy and the differences between Korea and Hong Kong. Three questions need to be explored, 1. What are the differences in ICT use between students in Korea and Hong Kong? 2. What is the relationship between ICT use and reading literacy in Korea and Hong Kong? 3. What is the impact of ICT use on reading literacy in Korea and Hong Kong? In this paper, independent sample t-test, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were used as the research methods. (1) The means of most variables were greater in Hong Kong than in Korea, and only ICT application in the classroom (ICTCLASS) was greater in Korea than in Hong Kong; except for ICT availability at home (ICTHOME), all 10 variables were significantly different between the two regions. (2) In the correlation analysis, students in both regions performed well on the variables related to ICT interest and perception, and all three variables, INTICT, COMPICT, and AUTICT, were positively and significantly related to reading literacy. (3) In the multiple regression analysis, both Korean and Hong Kong students showed negative effects on the variables of ICT use in school, social ICT use, and ICT availability in school, and positive effects on the other variables, but Hong Kong students also showed negative effects on the variable of ICT availability at home. Through this analysis, this paper concludes that the focus of improving reading literacy is not on investing more budget to increase ICT applications, but on the need to increase young people"s interest and perception of ICT, and that teachers and parents are essential in guiding ICT applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信