混凝土箱形涵的土压力评价

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Tristan Sanderson, Brent M. Phares, Katelyn S. Freeseman, Zhengyu Liu
{"title":"混凝土箱形涵的土压力评价","authors":"Tristan Sanderson, Brent M. Phares, Katelyn S. Freeseman, Zhengyu Liu","doi":"10.1177/03611981231198467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earth pressure on concrete box culverts is a key component of design and load-rating decisions. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials has revised the design guidelines over the years to impose greater design/rating earth pressures for buried structures. Currently, the Iowa Department of Transportation uses the maximum and minimum lateral earth pressure of 36/18 lb/ft3 specified for load factor design (LFD) and allowable stress design (ASD) and 60/30 lb/ft3 for load and resistance factor design (LRFD). The objective of this research is to monitor and evaluate the real earth pressures acting on deep-buried culvert structures. To achieve this objective, two concrete box culverts–one in Ida County and the other in Crawford County–were monitored for more than 2.5 years and 1 year, respectively, to identify the realistic design soil pressure. The captured pressure, strain, and temperature data were analyzed to find the relation between the temperature and earth pressure experienced by the culverts. The measured vertical and lateral pressures were compared with the specified design pressure loading. The monitoring results from both culverts led to the consistent conclusion that the earth pressure experienced by the culverts was two to six times that of the design values with the LRFD and LFD/ASD methods. This paper revealed that the earth pressure acting on the deeply embedded culvert could be higher than the design-specified value. Further research was recommended to investigate the relation between the soil weight and culvert vertical/lateral pressure for Iowa design specifications.","PeriodicalId":23279,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Earth Pressure Acting on Concrete Box Culverts\",\"authors\":\"Tristan Sanderson, Brent M. Phares, Katelyn S. Freeseman, Zhengyu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03611981231198467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Earth pressure on concrete box culverts is a key component of design and load-rating decisions. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials has revised the design guidelines over the years to impose greater design/rating earth pressures for buried structures. Currently, the Iowa Department of Transportation uses the maximum and minimum lateral earth pressure of 36/18 lb/ft3 specified for load factor design (LFD) and allowable stress design (ASD) and 60/30 lb/ft3 for load and resistance factor design (LRFD). The objective of this research is to monitor and evaluate the real earth pressures acting on deep-buried culvert structures. To achieve this objective, two concrete box culverts–one in Ida County and the other in Crawford County–were monitored for more than 2.5 years and 1 year, respectively, to identify the realistic design soil pressure. The captured pressure, strain, and temperature data were analyzed to find the relation between the temperature and earth pressure experienced by the culverts. The measured vertical and lateral pressures were compared with the specified design pressure loading. The monitoring results from both culverts led to the consistent conclusion that the earth pressure experienced by the culverts was two to six times that of the design values with the LRFD and LFD/ASD methods. This paper revealed that the earth pressure acting on the deeply embedded culvert could be higher than the design-specified value. Further research was recommended to investigate the relation between the soil weight and culvert vertical/lateral pressure for Iowa design specifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Record\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231198467\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231198467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土箱涵的土压力是设计和荷载等级决策的关键组成部分。多年来,美国国家公路和交通官员协会修订了设计指南,对埋地结构施加更大的设计/额定土压力。目前,爱荷华州交通局在载荷系数设计(LFD)和允许应力设计(ASD)中使用的最大和最小侧土压力为36/18 lb/ft3,在载荷和阻力系数设计(LRFD)中使用的最大和最小侧土压力为60/30 lb/ft3。本研究的目的是监测和评估作用于深埋涵洞结构的实际土压力。为了实现这一目标,两个混凝土箱形涵洞——一个在艾达县,另一个在克劳福德县——分别进行了超过2.5年和1年的监测,以确定实际的设计土压力。通过对捕获的压力、应变和温度数据进行分析,找出涵洞所经历的温度和土压力之间的关系。测量的竖向和侧向压力与指定的设计压力载荷进行了比较。两个涵洞的监测结果一致表明,采用LRFD和LFD/ASD方法,涵洞所承受的土压力是设计值的2 ~ 6倍。结果表明,作用在深埋涵洞上的土压力可能高于设计规定值。建议进一步研究土重与涵洞竖向/侧压力之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Earth Pressure Acting on Concrete Box Culverts
Earth pressure on concrete box culverts is a key component of design and load-rating decisions. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials has revised the design guidelines over the years to impose greater design/rating earth pressures for buried structures. Currently, the Iowa Department of Transportation uses the maximum and minimum lateral earth pressure of 36/18 lb/ft3 specified for load factor design (LFD) and allowable stress design (ASD) and 60/30 lb/ft3 for load and resistance factor design (LRFD). The objective of this research is to monitor and evaluate the real earth pressures acting on deep-buried culvert structures. To achieve this objective, two concrete box culverts–one in Ida County and the other in Crawford County–were monitored for more than 2.5 years and 1 year, respectively, to identify the realistic design soil pressure. The captured pressure, strain, and temperature data were analyzed to find the relation between the temperature and earth pressure experienced by the culverts. The measured vertical and lateral pressures were compared with the specified design pressure loading. The monitoring results from both culverts led to the consistent conclusion that the earth pressure experienced by the culverts was two to six times that of the design values with the LRFD and LFD/ASD methods. This paper revealed that the earth pressure acting on the deeply embedded culvert could be higher than the design-specified value. Further research was recommended to investigate the relation between the soil weight and culvert vertical/lateral pressure for Iowa design specifications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Record
Transportation Research Record 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
918
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board is one of the most cited and prolific transportation journals in the world, offering unparalleled depth and breadth in the coverage of transportation-related topics. The TRR publishes approximately 70 issues annually of outstanding, peer-reviewed papers presenting research findings in policy, planning, administration, economics and financing, operations, construction, design, maintenance, safety, and more, for all modes of transportation. This site provides electronic access to a full compilation of papers since the 1996 series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信