益生菌与常见病原体混合培养的生长评估

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Mansa Fredua-Agyeman , Paul Stapleton , Simon Gaisford
{"title":"益生菌与常见病原体混合培养的生长评估","authors":"Mansa Fredua-Agyeman ,&nbsp;Paul Stapleton ,&nbsp;Simon Gaisford","doi":"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>In this work, an isothermal microcalorimeter was applied to investigate the antipathogenic activity of three probiotics (</span><span><em>Lactobacillus acidophilus</em></span>, <span><em>Bifidobacterium lactis</em></span> and <span><em>Bifidobacterium bifidum</em></span>) against <span><em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em></span>, <span><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em></span> and <em>Escherichia coli</em><span> using the probiotics in mixed culture with the pathogenic microorganisms.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A microcalorimeter was used to monitor the growth of the microorganisms as pure cultures and as co-cultures at 37 °C. Relative growths of the probiotics and pathogenic species were determined after microcalorimetric measurements by serial dilution and plate incubation. Relative growth of mixed cultures of </span><em>E. coli</em> with <em>L. acidophilus</em> or <em>B. lactis</em><span> was also determined by traditional plate growth assay for 5.5 h.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed growth profiles of the microorganisms that were characteristic and showed different lag and peak times for the species. The pathogenic species grew faster than the probiotic species. In the co-cultures, the growth profile of both pathogenic species and probiotics could be identified with the microcalorimeter. Although the pathogenic species grew faster, at the end of the assay, the results showed that the pathogenic species were inhibited in growth by the probiotics as no viable growth of the pathogenic species was detected whereas 10<sup>7</sup>–10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL of the probiotics were enumerated after the microcalorimetric assay. Using the traditional plate assay, the data confirmed co-growth of the probiotics and <em>E. coli</em> although cell numbers of <em>E. coli</em> were higher than the probiotics during 5.5 h of co-culture incubation when both were inoculated at 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results demonstrate the antipathogenic effects of probiotics and highlights the potential of microcalorimetry in live mixed culture assays and its limitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8050,"journal":{"name":"Anaerobe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth assessment of mixed cultures of probiotics and common pathogens\",\"authors\":\"Mansa Fredua-Agyeman ,&nbsp;Paul Stapleton ,&nbsp;Simon Gaisford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>In this work, an isothermal microcalorimeter was applied to investigate the antipathogenic activity of three probiotics (</span><span><em>Lactobacillus acidophilus</em></span>, <span><em>Bifidobacterium lactis</em></span> and <span><em>Bifidobacterium bifidum</em></span>) against <span><em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em></span>, <span><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em></span> and <em>Escherichia coli</em><span> using the probiotics in mixed culture with the pathogenic microorganisms.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A microcalorimeter was used to monitor the growth of the microorganisms as pure cultures and as co-cultures at 37 °C. Relative growths of the probiotics and pathogenic species were determined after microcalorimetric measurements by serial dilution and plate incubation. Relative growth of mixed cultures of </span><em>E. coli</em> with <em>L. acidophilus</em> or <em>B. lactis</em><span> was also determined by traditional plate growth assay for 5.5 h.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed growth profiles of the microorganisms that were characteristic and showed different lag and peak times for the species. The pathogenic species grew faster than the probiotic species. In the co-cultures, the growth profile of both pathogenic species and probiotics could be identified with the microcalorimeter. Although the pathogenic species grew faster, at the end of the assay, the results showed that the pathogenic species were inhibited in growth by the probiotics as no viable growth of the pathogenic species was detected whereas 10<sup>7</sup>–10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL of the probiotics were enumerated after the microcalorimetric assay. Using the traditional plate assay, the data confirmed co-growth of the probiotics and <em>E. coli</em> although cell numbers of <em>E. coli</em> were higher than the probiotics during 5.5 h of co-culture incubation when both were inoculated at 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results demonstrate the antipathogenic effects of probiotics and highlights the potential of microcalorimetry in live mixed culture assays and its limitation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaerobe\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaerobe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996423000999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaerobe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996423000999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用等温微量热计研究了三种益生菌(嗜酸乳杆菌、乳酸双歧杆菌和两歧双歧杆菌)与病原菌混合培养对铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的抑菌活性。用微量热计监测纯培养和共培养的微生物在37℃下的生长情况。通过连续稀释和平板培养的微量热测量,确定了益生菌和致病菌的相对生长情况。采用传统的平板生长法测定了大肠杆菌与嗜酸乳杆菌或乳酸杆菌混合培养5.5 h后的相对生长情况。结果表明,两种微生物的生长曲线具有各自的特点,并表现出不同的滞后期和峰值时间。病原菌的生长速度快于益生菌。在共培养中,病原菌和益生菌的生长情况都可以用微量热计进行鉴定。虽然病原菌的生长速度较快,但在实验结束时,益生菌对病原菌的生长有抑制作用,未检测到病原菌的活菌生长,而微量热测定后,病原菌的活菌量为107 ~ 108 CFU/mL。在106 CFU/mL的接种量下,共培养5.5 h时,大肠杆菌的细胞数明显高于益生菌,但传统平板法证实了益生菌与大肠杆菌的共生生长。结果证明了益生菌的抗病原菌作用,并强调了微量热法在混合培养试验中的潜力及其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth assessment of mixed cultures of probiotics and common pathogens

Objectives

In this work, an isothermal microcalorimeter was applied to investigate the antipathogenic activity of three probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis and Bifidobacterium bifidum) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli using the probiotics in mixed culture with the pathogenic microorganisms.

Methods

A microcalorimeter was used to monitor the growth of the microorganisms as pure cultures and as co-cultures at 37 °C. Relative growths of the probiotics and pathogenic species were determined after microcalorimetric measurements by serial dilution and plate incubation. Relative growth of mixed cultures of E. coli with L. acidophilus or B. lactis was also determined by traditional plate growth assay for 5.5 h.

Results

The results showed growth profiles of the microorganisms that were characteristic and showed different lag and peak times for the species. The pathogenic species grew faster than the probiotic species. In the co-cultures, the growth profile of both pathogenic species and probiotics could be identified with the microcalorimeter. Although the pathogenic species grew faster, at the end of the assay, the results showed that the pathogenic species were inhibited in growth by the probiotics as no viable growth of the pathogenic species was detected whereas 107–108 CFU/mL of the probiotics were enumerated after the microcalorimetric assay. Using the traditional plate assay, the data confirmed co-growth of the probiotics and E. coli although cell numbers of E. coli were higher than the probiotics during 5.5 h of co-culture incubation when both were inoculated at 106 CFU/mL.

Conclusion

The results demonstrate the antipathogenic effects of probiotics and highlights the potential of microcalorimetry in live mixed culture assays and its limitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaerobe
Anaerobe 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Anaerobe is essential reading for those who wish to remain at the forefront of discoveries relating to life processes of strictly anaerobes. The journal is multi-disciplinary, and provides a unique forum for those investigating anaerobic organisms that cause infections in humans and animals, as well as anaerobes that play roles in microbiomes or environmental processes. Anaerobe publishes reviews, mini reviews, original research articles, notes and case reports. Relevant topics fall into the broad categories of anaerobes in human and animal diseases, anaerobes in the microbiome, anaerobes in the environment, diagnosis of anaerobes in clinical microbiology laboratories, molecular biology, genetics, pathogenesis, toxins and antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信