比较自体胚胎移植周期中常规体外受精与非指示性卵胞浆内单精子注射的生殖结果:辅助生殖技术协会诊所结果报告系统研究

Julian A. Gingold M.D., Ph.D. , Haotian Wu Ph.D. , Harry Lieman M.D. , Manvinder Singh M.D. , Sangita Jindal Ph.D., H.C.L.D.
{"title":"比较自体胚胎移植周期中常规体外受精与非指示性卵胞浆内单精子注射的生殖结果:辅助生殖技术协会诊所结果报告系统研究","authors":"Julian A. Gingold M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Haotian Wu Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Harry Lieman M.D. ,&nbsp;Manvinder Singh M.D. ,&nbsp;Sangita Jindal Ph.D., H.C.L.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare clinical outcomes between nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional insemination.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Autologous cycles performed from 2014–2017 were identified, excluding frozen oocyte cycles. Outcomes were compared between conventional insemination (in vitro fertilization [IVF]) and nonindiated ICSI and analyzed separately for fresh, frozen-thawed preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and frozen-thawed non-PGT cycles.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>US-based fertility clinics reporting to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 187,520 patients underwent 318,930 cycles, 57,516 (18.0%) using conventional IVF and 261,414 ICSI (82.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with or without indications (male factor, prior fertilization failure or any PGT [2012 recommendations]/single-gene PGT [2020 recommendations]).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Odds ratios (ORs) for live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were calculated after multivariable adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, infertility etiologies, prior IVF births, and number oocytes retrieved.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was indicated in 151,627 (58.0%) of cycles according to 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee recommendations, and 108,895 (41.7%) according to 2020 recommendations. In multivariable models, nonindicated ICSI among fresh cycles was associated with reduced odds of completing a blastocyst-stage transfer (OR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.7, 0.75]; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), resulting in reduced odds of live birth (OR, 0.80; 95% CI [0.78, 0.83]; <em>P</em>&lt;.001). Among completed fresh transfers, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were comparable between nonindicated ICSI and IVF. Nonindicated ICSI in frozen-thawed cycles with PGT and without PGT was associated with comparable live birth and clinical pregnancy rates with IVF in multivariable models.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nonindicated ICSI was associated with reduced blastocyst availability in fresh cycles compared with IVF, leading to lower live birth rates. Outcomes from completed transfers were clinically comparable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412300106X/pdfft?md5=8efab83bfedb5db93db60dda771d41e8&pid=1-s2.0-S266633412300106X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing reproductive outcomes between conventional in vitro fertilization and nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection in autologous embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System Study\",\"authors\":\"Julian A. Gingold M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Haotian Wu Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Harry Lieman M.D. ,&nbsp;Manvinder Singh M.D. ,&nbsp;Sangita Jindal Ph.D., H.C.L.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfre.2023.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare clinical outcomes between nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional insemination.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Autologous cycles performed from 2014–2017 were identified, excluding frozen oocyte cycles. Outcomes were compared between conventional insemination (in vitro fertilization [IVF]) and nonindiated ICSI and analyzed separately for fresh, frozen-thawed preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and frozen-thawed non-PGT cycles.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>US-based fertility clinics reporting to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 187,520 patients underwent 318,930 cycles, 57,516 (18.0%) using conventional IVF and 261,414 ICSI (82.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with or without indications (male factor, prior fertilization failure or any PGT [2012 recommendations]/single-gene PGT [2020 recommendations]).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Odds ratios (ORs) for live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were calculated after multivariable adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, infertility etiologies, prior IVF births, and number oocytes retrieved.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was indicated in 151,627 (58.0%) of cycles according to 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee recommendations, and 108,895 (41.7%) according to 2020 recommendations. In multivariable models, nonindicated ICSI among fresh cycles was associated with reduced odds of completing a blastocyst-stage transfer (OR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.7, 0.75]; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), resulting in reduced odds of live birth (OR, 0.80; 95% CI [0.78, 0.83]; <em>P</em>&lt;.001). Among completed fresh transfers, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were comparable between nonindicated ICSI and IVF. Nonindicated ICSI in frozen-thawed cycles with PGT and without PGT was associated with comparable live birth and clinical pregnancy rates with IVF in multivariable models.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nonindicated ICSI was associated with reduced blastocyst availability in fresh cycles compared with IVF, leading to lower live birth rates. Outcomes from completed transfers were clinically comparable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FS Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412300106X/pdfft?md5=8efab83bfedb5db93db60dda771d41e8&pid=1-s2.0-S266633412300106X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412300106X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412300106X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较非特异性卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)和传统人工授精的临床结果。设计对2014-2017年进行的自体受精周期进行了鉴定,不包括冷冻卵母细胞周期。比较了常规人工授精(体外受精[IVF])和无指征卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)的结果,并分别分析了新鲜、冷冻解冻的植入前遗传学检测(PGT)周期和冷冻解冻的非PGT周期的结果。干预措施卵胞浆内单精子注射,有或无适应症(男性因素、先前受精失败或任何 PGT [2012 年建议]/单基因 PGT [2020 年建议])。结果根据美国生殖医学会实践委员会 2012 年的建议,151627 个周期(58.0%)采用了卵胞浆内单精子注射;根据 2020 年的建议,108895 个周期(41.7%)采用了卵胞浆内单精子注射。在多变量模型中,在新鲜周期中,未指定的 ICSI 与完成囊胚期移植的几率降低有关(OR,0.72;95% 置信区间 [CI][0.7,0.75];P<.001),导致活产几率降低(OR,0.80;95% CI [0.78,0.83];P<.001)。在完成的新鲜移植中,非特异性卵胞浆内单精子显微注射与体外受精的临床妊娠率和活产率相当。在多变量模型中,有 PGT 和无 PGT 的冷冻解冻周期中的非指示性 ICSI 与试管婴儿的活产率和临床妊娠率相当。完成移植的结果在临床上具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing reproductive outcomes between conventional in vitro fertilization and nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection in autologous embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System Study

Objective

To compare clinical outcomes between nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional insemination.

Design

Autologous cycles performed from 2014–2017 were identified, excluding frozen oocyte cycles. Outcomes were compared between conventional insemination (in vitro fertilization [IVF]) and nonindiated ICSI and analyzed separately for fresh, frozen-thawed preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and frozen-thawed non-PGT cycles.

Setting

US-based fertility clinics reporting to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Participants

A total of 187,520 patients underwent 318,930 cycles, 57,516 (18.0%) using conventional IVF and 261,414 ICSI (82.0%).

Interventions

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with or without indications (male factor, prior fertilization failure or any PGT [2012 recommendations]/single-gene PGT [2020 recommendations]).

Main Outcome Measures

Odds ratios (ORs) for live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were calculated after multivariable adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, infertility etiologies, prior IVF births, and number oocytes retrieved.

Results

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was indicated in 151,627 (58.0%) of cycles according to 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee recommendations, and 108,895 (41.7%) according to 2020 recommendations. In multivariable models, nonindicated ICSI among fresh cycles was associated with reduced odds of completing a blastocyst-stage transfer (OR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.7, 0.75]; P<.001), resulting in reduced odds of live birth (OR, 0.80; 95% CI [0.78, 0.83]; P<.001). Among completed fresh transfers, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were comparable between nonindicated ICSI and IVF. Nonindicated ICSI in frozen-thawed cycles with PGT and without PGT was associated with comparable live birth and clinical pregnancy rates with IVF in multivariable models.

Conclusion

Nonindicated ICSI was associated with reduced blastocyst availability in fresh cycles compared with IVF, leading to lower live birth rates. Outcomes from completed transfers were clinically comparable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信