Alexander F Heimann, Iris F Brouze, Guoyan Zheng, Angela M Moosmann, Joseph M Schwab, Moritz Tannast, Corinne A Zurmühle
{"title":"伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后骨盆倾斜-一项长期随访研究","authors":"Alexander F Heimann, Iris F Brouze, Guoyan Zheng, Angela M Moosmann, Joseph M Schwab, Moritz Tannast, Corinne A Zurmühle","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnad030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are believed to present with increased anterior pelvic tilt to compensate for reduced anterior femoral head coverage. If true, pelvic tilt in dysplastic patients should be high preoperatively and decrease after correction with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). To date, the evolution of pelvic tilt in long-term follow-up after PAO has not been reported. We therefore asked the following questions: (i) is there a difference in pelvic tilt between patients with DDH and an asymptomatic control group? (ii) How does pelvic tilt evolve during long-term follow-up after Bernese PAO compared with before surgery? This study is a therapeutic study with the level of evidence III. We retrospectively compared preoperative pelvic tilt in 64 dysplastic patients (71 hips) with an asymptomatic control group of 20 patients (20 hips). In addition, immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up (at 18 ± 8 [range 7–34 years) pelvic tilt was assessed and compared. Dysplastic patients had a significantly higher mean preoperative pelvic tilt than controls [2.3 ± 5.3° (−11.2° to 16.4°) versus 1.1 ± 3.0° (−4.9 to 5.9), P = 0.006]. Mean pelvic tilt postoperatively was 1.5 ± 5.3° (−11.2 to 17.0º, P = 0.221) and at long-term follow-up was 0.4 ± 5.7° (range −9.9° to 20.9°, P = 0.002). Dysplastic hips undergoing PAO show a statistically significant decrease in pelvic tilt during long-term follow-up. However, given the large interindividual variability in pelvic tilt, the observed differences may not achieve clinical significance.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pelvic tilt after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy—a long-term follow-up study\",\"authors\":\"Alexander F Heimann, Iris F Brouze, Guoyan Zheng, Angela M Moosmann, Joseph M Schwab, Moritz Tannast, Corinne A Zurmühle\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jhps/hnad030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are believed to present with increased anterior pelvic tilt to compensate for reduced anterior femoral head coverage. If true, pelvic tilt in dysplastic patients should be high preoperatively and decrease after correction with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). To date, the evolution of pelvic tilt in long-term follow-up after PAO has not been reported. We therefore asked the following questions: (i) is there a difference in pelvic tilt between patients with DDH and an asymptomatic control group? (ii) How does pelvic tilt evolve during long-term follow-up after Bernese PAO compared with before surgery? This study is a therapeutic study with the level of evidence III. We retrospectively compared preoperative pelvic tilt in 64 dysplastic patients (71 hips) with an asymptomatic control group of 20 patients (20 hips). In addition, immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up (at 18 ± 8 [range 7–34 years) pelvic tilt was assessed and compared. Dysplastic patients had a significantly higher mean preoperative pelvic tilt than controls [2.3 ± 5.3° (−11.2° to 16.4°) versus 1.1 ± 3.0° (−4.9 to 5.9), P = 0.006]. Mean pelvic tilt postoperatively was 1.5 ± 5.3° (−11.2 to 17.0º, P = 0.221) and at long-term follow-up was 0.4 ± 5.7° (range −9.9° to 20.9°, P = 0.002). Dysplastic hips undergoing PAO show a statistically significant decrease in pelvic tilt during long-term follow-up. However, given the large interindividual variability in pelvic tilt, the observed differences may not achieve clinical significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pelvic tilt after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy—a long-term follow-up study
ABSTRACT Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are believed to present with increased anterior pelvic tilt to compensate for reduced anterior femoral head coverage. If true, pelvic tilt in dysplastic patients should be high preoperatively and decrease after correction with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). To date, the evolution of pelvic tilt in long-term follow-up after PAO has not been reported. We therefore asked the following questions: (i) is there a difference in pelvic tilt between patients with DDH and an asymptomatic control group? (ii) How does pelvic tilt evolve during long-term follow-up after Bernese PAO compared with before surgery? This study is a therapeutic study with the level of evidence III. We retrospectively compared preoperative pelvic tilt in 64 dysplastic patients (71 hips) with an asymptomatic control group of 20 patients (20 hips). In addition, immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up (at 18 ± 8 [range 7–34 years) pelvic tilt was assessed and compared. Dysplastic patients had a significantly higher mean preoperative pelvic tilt than controls [2.3 ± 5.3° (−11.2° to 16.4°) versus 1.1 ± 3.0° (−4.9 to 5.9), P = 0.006]. Mean pelvic tilt postoperatively was 1.5 ± 5.3° (−11.2 to 17.0º, P = 0.221) and at long-term follow-up was 0.4 ± 5.7° (range −9.9° to 20.9°, P = 0.002). Dysplastic hips undergoing PAO show a statistically significant decrease in pelvic tilt during long-term follow-up. However, given the large interindividual variability in pelvic tilt, the observed differences may not achieve clinical significance.