髋臼周围截骨术会改变骨盆倾斜吗?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jeroen C F Verhaegen, Emin Süha Dedeoğulları, Isabel S Horton, Paul E Beaulé, George Grammatopoulos
{"title":"髋臼周围截骨术会改变骨盆倾斜吗?","authors":"Jeroen C F Verhaegen, Emin Süha Dedeoğulları, Isabel S Horton, Paul E Beaulé, George Grammatopoulos","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Change in pelvic tilt (PT) during and after peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) is important for surgical planning. The aims of this study were to (i) determine how PT varies throughout the course of treatment in patients undergoing PAO, (ii) test what factors influence the change in PT and (iii) assess whether changes in PT influenced achieved correction. This is an retrospective, single-centre, consecutive case series of 111 patients treated with PAO for global (n = 79), posterior (n = 49) or anterior dysplasia (n = 6) (mean age: 27.3 ± 7.7 years; 85% females). PT was determined on supine, anteroposterior pelvic radiographs pre-, intra-, 1 day, 6 weeks and 1 year post-operatively, using the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, a validated, surrogate marker of PT. An optimal acetabular correction was based on the lateral centre-edge angle (25°–40°), acetabular index (−5° to 10°) and cross-over ratio (<20%). There was a significant difference across pre- (70.1° ± 4.8°), 1-day (71.7° ± 4.3°; P < 0.001) and early post-operative SFP (70.6° ± 4.7°; P = 0.004). The difference in SPF between pre-operative and 1-year post-operative was −0.5° ± 3.1° (P = 0.043), with 9% of cases having a difference of >5°. The difference in SFP did not correlate with age, sex, body mass index, type of dysplasia or achievement of optimal acetabular correction (P = 0.1–0.9). In the early post-operative period, PT is reduced, leading to a relative appearance of acetabular retroversion, which gradually corrects and is restored by annual follow-up. The degree of change in PT during PAO did not adversely affect fragment orientation. PT does not significantly change in most patients undergoing PAO and therefore does not appear to be a compensatory mechanism.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does pelvic tilt change with a peri-acetabular osteotomy?\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen C F Verhaegen, Emin Süha Dedeoğulları, Isabel S Horton, Paul E Beaulé, George Grammatopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jhps/hnad029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Change in pelvic tilt (PT) during and after peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) is important for surgical planning. The aims of this study were to (i) determine how PT varies throughout the course of treatment in patients undergoing PAO, (ii) test what factors influence the change in PT and (iii) assess whether changes in PT influenced achieved correction. This is an retrospective, single-centre, consecutive case series of 111 patients treated with PAO for global (n = 79), posterior (n = 49) or anterior dysplasia (n = 6) (mean age: 27.3 ± 7.7 years; 85% females). PT was determined on supine, anteroposterior pelvic radiographs pre-, intra-, 1 day, 6 weeks and 1 year post-operatively, using the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, a validated, surrogate marker of PT. An optimal acetabular correction was based on the lateral centre-edge angle (25°–40°), acetabular index (−5° to 10°) and cross-over ratio (<20%). There was a significant difference across pre- (70.1° ± 4.8°), 1-day (71.7° ± 4.3°; P < 0.001) and early post-operative SFP (70.6° ± 4.7°; P = 0.004). The difference in SPF between pre-operative and 1-year post-operative was −0.5° ± 3.1° (P = 0.043), with 9% of cases having a difference of >5°. The difference in SFP did not correlate with age, sex, body mass index, type of dysplasia or achievement of optimal acetabular correction (P = 0.1–0.9). In the early post-operative period, PT is reduced, leading to a relative appearance of acetabular retroversion, which gradually corrects and is restored by annual follow-up. The degree of change in PT during PAO did not adversely affect fragment orientation. PT does not significantly change in most patients undergoing PAO and therefore does not appear to be a compensatory mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)期间和之后骨盆倾斜(PT)的变化对手术计划很重要。本研究的目的是(i)确定在PAO患者的整个治疗过程中PT是如何变化的,(ii)测试影响PT变化的因素,(iii)评估PT变化是否影响达到的矫正。这是一项回顾性、单中心、连续的病例系列研究,包括111例接受PAO治疗的整体(n = 79)、后部(n = 49)或前部发育不良(n = 6)的患者(平均年龄:27.3±7.7岁;85%的女性)。术后1天、6周和1年,在仰卧位、骨盆前后位x线片上测定PT,使用经验证的替代PT标记物骶股耻骨(SFP)角。最佳髋臼矫正基于外侧中心边缘角(25°- 40°)、髋臼指数(- 5°至10°)和交叉比(<20%)。术前(70.1°±4.8°)、1天(71.7°±4.3°;P, lt;0.001)和术后早期SFP(70.6°±4.7°;P = 0.004)。术前与术后1年的SPF值差异为- 0.5°±3.1°(P = 0.043),其中9%的病例差异为5°。SFP的差异与年龄、性别、体重指数、发育不良类型或最佳髋臼矫正效果无关(P = 0.1-0.9)。在术后早期,PT降低,导致髋臼向后倾的相对外观,逐渐纠正,并通过每年随访恢复。PAO期间PT的变化程度对片段取向没有不利影响。在大多数接受PAO的患者中,PT没有显著改变,因此似乎不是一种代偿机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does pelvic tilt change with a peri-acetabular osteotomy?
ABSTRACT Change in pelvic tilt (PT) during and after peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) is important for surgical planning. The aims of this study were to (i) determine how PT varies throughout the course of treatment in patients undergoing PAO, (ii) test what factors influence the change in PT and (iii) assess whether changes in PT influenced achieved correction. This is an retrospective, single-centre, consecutive case series of 111 patients treated with PAO for global (n = 79), posterior (n = 49) or anterior dysplasia (n = 6) (mean age: 27.3 ± 7.7 years; 85% females). PT was determined on supine, anteroposterior pelvic radiographs pre-, intra-, 1 day, 6 weeks and 1 year post-operatively, using the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, a validated, surrogate marker of PT. An optimal acetabular correction was based on the lateral centre-edge angle (25°–40°), acetabular index (−5° to 10°) and cross-over ratio (&lt;20%). There was a significant difference across pre- (70.1° ± 4.8°), 1-day (71.7° ± 4.3°; P &lt; 0.001) and early post-operative SFP (70.6° ± 4.7°; P = 0.004). The difference in SPF between pre-operative and 1-year post-operative was −0.5° ± 3.1° (P = 0.043), with 9% of cases having a difference of &gt;5°. The difference in SFP did not correlate with age, sex, body mass index, type of dysplasia or achievement of optimal acetabular correction (P = 0.1–0.9). In the early post-operative period, PT is reduced, leading to a relative appearance of acetabular retroversion, which gradually corrects and is restored by annual follow-up. The degree of change in PT during PAO did not adversely affect fragment orientation. PT does not significantly change in most patients undergoing PAO and therefore does not appear to be a compensatory mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信