真空弹出次数与新生儿不良结局之间的关系

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Allie Sakowicz, Salwa J. Zahalka, Emily S. Miller
{"title":"真空弹出次数与新生儿不良结局之间的关系","authors":"Allie Sakowicz, Salwa J. Zahalka, Emily S. Miller","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000967000.16402.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) is used to expedite vaginal delivery in cases of an arrest of descent, maternal exhaustion, or concern for fetal well-being. In 2015, the rate of VAVD was greater than the use of forceps in the United States (2.58% vs 0.56%). Several studies have examined various characteristics of vacuum devices, such as cup shape and material, number of pulls, and number of pop-ups, which is defined as the spontaneous dislodgment of the cup from the fetal scalp. Vacuum manufacturers, such as Kiwi and Mityvac, recommend abandoning VAVD as an intervention after 2 or 3 pop-offs; however, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists acknowledges that there are not enough data to recommend guidelines on how many pop-offs should be allowed before discontinuing. Some studies have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with any number of pop-offs versus no pop-offs, whereas other studies have shown no independent association between the number of pop-offs and neonatal head injury. In addition, compared with an increase in the number of pop-offs, a large multicenter study found that increased duration of VAVD has a stronger association with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the number of pop-offs and adverse neonatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary care institution from October 1, 2005, to June 1, 2014. Data were collected from electronic medical records. Included were adult women with singleton pregnancies who delivered via VAVD or a trial of VAVD followed by cesarean delivery. Excluded were those who underwent sequential trials of both vacuum and forceps. Institutional policy recommended converting to cesarean delivery after >3 pop-offs, but the decision was left to the discretion of the physician. The primary outcome was a composite of severe adverse neonatal outcome, including brachial plexus injury, intracranial hemorrhage, convulsions, and central nervous system (CNS) depression. Other outcomes of study were scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, CNS depression, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A total of 1730 women were included in the analysis. Of these, 74.7% had no pop-offs, 13.9% had 1 pop-off, 7.4% had 2 pop-offs, and approximately 4% had ≥3 pop-offs. Approximately 94% delivered via VAVD. As the number of pop-offs increased, the number of scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, subgaleal hemorrhage, convulsions, CNS depression, and NICU admissions significantly increased. However, there was no association with the composite outcome, as well as severe perinatal laceration, shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, and cephalohematoma. Adjusting for confounders, having any number of pop-offs increased the likelihood of scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, convulsions, CNS depression, and NICU admission. However, there was not a dose-dependent association in the odds of adverse outcomes as the number of pop-offs increased. Compared with having no pop-offs, having any number of pop-offs was associated with an increase in adverse neonatal outcomes. In addition, the rates of intracranial hemorrhage and subgaleal hemorrhage were increased with greater numbers of pop-offs.","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between the Number of Vacuum Pop-Offs and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Allie Sakowicz, Salwa J. Zahalka, Emily S. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.ogx.0000967000.16402.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) is used to expedite vaginal delivery in cases of an arrest of descent, maternal exhaustion, or concern for fetal well-being. In 2015, the rate of VAVD was greater than the use of forceps in the United States (2.58% vs 0.56%). Several studies have examined various characteristics of vacuum devices, such as cup shape and material, number of pulls, and number of pop-ups, which is defined as the spontaneous dislodgment of the cup from the fetal scalp. Vacuum manufacturers, such as Kiwi and Mityvac, recommend abandoning VAVD as an intervention after 2 or 3 pop-offs; however, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists acknowledges that there are not enough data to recommend guidelines on how many pop-offs should be allowed before discontinuing. Some studies have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with any number of pop-offs versus no pop-offs, whereas other studies have shown no independent association between the number of pop-offs and neonatal head injury. In addition, compared with an increase in the number of pop-offs, a large multicenter study found that increased duration of VAVD has a stronger association with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the number of pop-offs and adverse neonatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary care institution from October 1, 2005, to June 1, 2014. Data were collected from electronic medical records. Included were adult women with singleton pregnancies who delivered via VAVD or a trial of VAVD followed by cesarean delivery. Excluded were those who underwent sequential trials of both vacuum and forceps. Institutional policy recommended converting to cesarean delivery after >3 pop-offs, but the decision was left to the discretion of the physician. The primary outcome was a composite of severe adverse neonatal outcome, including brachial plexus injury, intracranial hemorrhage, convulsions, and central nervous system (CNS) depression. Other outcomes of study were scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, CNS depression, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A total of 1730 women were included in the analysis. Of these, 74.7% had no pop-offs, 13.9% had 1 pop-off, 7.4% had 2 pop-offs, and approximately 4% had ≥3 pop-offs. Approximately 94% delivered via VAVD. As the number of pop-offs increased, the number of scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, subgaleal hemorrhage, convulsions, CNS depression, and NICU admissions significantly increased. However, there was no association with the composite outcome, as well as severe perinatal laceration, shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, and cephalohematoma. Adjusting for confounders, having any number of pop-offs increased the likelihood of scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, convulsions, CNS depression, and NICU admission. However, there was not a dose-dependent association in the odds of adverse outcomes as the number of pop-offs increased. Compared with having no pop-offs, having any number of pop-offs was associated with an increase in adverse neonatal outcomes. In addition, the rates of intracranial hemorrhage and subgaleal hemorrhage were increased with greater numbers of pop-offs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000967000.16402.41\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000967000.16402.41","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

真空辅助阴道分娩(VAVD)是用来加快阴道分娩的情况下的下降,产妇疲惫,或胎儿健康的关注。2015年,美国VAVD使用率大于产钳使用率(2.58% vs 0.56%)。一些研究已经检查了真空装置的各种特征,比如杯子的形状和材料,拉动的次数,以及弹出的次数,弹出的定义是杯子从胎儿头皮上自发地脱落。真空制造商,如Kiwi和Mityvac,建议放弃VAVD作为2或3弹出后的干预措施;然而,美国妇产科学会承认,没有足够的数据来推荐在停止注射前应该允许注射多少次的指导方针。一些研究表明,与没有弹出弹相比,弹出弹的数量增加了新生儿不良结局的风险,而其他研究表明,弹出弹的数量与新生儿头部损伤之间没有独立的联系。此外,一项大型多中心研究发现,与突然发作次数的增加相比,VAVD持续时间的增加与不良后果的关联更强。本研究的目的是检查弹出次数和不良新生儿结局之间的关系。这是一项回顾性队列研究,于2005年10月1日至2014年6月1日在一家三级医疗机构进行。数据是从电子病历中收集的。包括通过VAVD或VAVD后剖宫产分娩的单胎妊娠成年妇女。排除那些同时进行真空和钳的连续试验的患者。机构政策建议在分娩后改为剖宫产,但这一决定由医生自行决定。主要结局是新生儿严重不良结局的综合,包括臂丛损伤、颅内出血、惊厥和中枢神经系统(CNS)抑制。研究的其他结果包括头皮/面部撕裂伤、颅内出血、癫痫发作、中枢神经系统抑制和入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。共有1730名女性参与了分析。其中,74.7%无弹窗,13.9%有1个弹窗,7.4%有2个弹窗,约4%有≥3个弹窗。约94%通过VAVD交付。随着弹出次数的增加,头皮/面部撕裂伤、颅内出血、galeal下出血、惊厥、中枢神经系统抑制和新生儿重症监护病房入院的数量显著增加。然而,与围生期严重撕裂伤、肩部难产、臂丛损伤和脑血肿等复合结局无关联。调整混杂因素,有任何数量的弹出增加了头皮/面部撕裂,颅内出血,惊厥,中枢神经系统抑制和新生儿重症监护病房入院的可能性。然而,随着弹出次数的增加,不良结果的几率不存在剂量依赖关系。与没有弹出相比,有任何数量的弹出与不良新生儿结局的增加有关。此外,颅内出血和galeal下出血的发生率随爆裂物数量的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between the Number of Vacuum Pop-Offs and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes
ABSTRACT Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) is used to expedite vaginal delivery in cases of an arrest of descent, maternal exhaustion, or concern for fetal well-being. In 2015, the rate of VAVD was greater than the use of forceps in the United States (2.58% vs 0.56%). Several studies have examined various characteristics of vacuum devices, such as cup shape and material, number of pulls, and number of pop-ups, which is defined as the spontaneous dislodgment of the cup from the fetal scalp. Vacuum manufacturers, such as Kiwi and Mityvac, recommend abandoning VAVD as an intervention after 2 or 3 pop-offs; however, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists acknowledges that there are not enough data to recommend guidelines on how many pop-offs should be allowed before discontinuing. Some studies have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with any number of pop-offs versus no pop-offs, whereas other studies have shown no independent association between the number of pop-offs and neonatal head injury. In addition, compared with an increase in the number of pop-offs, a large multicenter study found that increased duration of VAVD has a stronger association with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the number of pop-offs and adverse neonatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary care institution from October 1, 2005, to June 1, 2014. Data were collected from electronic medical records. Included were adult women with singleton pregnancies who delivered via VAVD or a trial of VAVD followed by cesarean delivery. Excluded were those who underwent sequential trials of both vacuum and forceps. Institutional policy recommended converting to cesarean delivery after >3 pop-offs, but the decision was left to the discretion of the physician. The primary outcome was a composite of severe adverse neonatal outcome, including brachial plexus injury, intracranial hemorrhage, convulsions, and central nervous system (CNS) depression. Other outcomes of study were scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, CNS depression, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A total of 1730 women were included in the analysis. Of these, 74.7% had no pop-offs, 13.9% had 1 pop-off, 7.4% had 2 pop-offs, and approximately 4% had ≥3 pop-offs. Approximately 94% delivered via VAVD. As the number of pop-offs increased, the number of scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, subgaleal hemorrhage, convulsions, CNS depression, and NICU admissions significantly increased. However, there was no association with the composite outcome, as well as severe perinatal laceration, shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, and cephalohematoma. Adjusting for confounders, having any number of pop-offs increased the likelihood of scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, convulsions, CNS depression, and NICU admission. However, there was not a dose-dependent association in the odds of adverse outcomes as the number of pop-offs increased. Compared with having no pop-offs, having any number of pop-offs was associated with an increase in adverse neonatal outcomes. In addition, the rates of intracranial hemorrhage and subgaleal hemorrhage were increased with greater numbers of pop-offs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
245
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Each monthly issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey presents summaries of the most timely and clinically relevant research being published worldwide. These concise, easy-to-read summaries provide expert insight into how to apply the latest research to patient care. The accompanying editorial commentary puts the studies into perspective and supplies authoritative guidance. The result is a valuable, time-saving resource for busy clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信