用于便携式计算设备的容积式阻力鼓风机性能的数值与实验研究及其优化

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Amit Kumar, Ayan Majumder, Ruander Cardenas, Mark MacDonald, Anandaroop Bhattacharya
{"title":"用于便携式计算设备的容积式阻力鼓风机性能的数值与实验研究及其优化","authors":"Amit Kumar, Ayan Majumder, Ruander Cardenas, Mark MacDonald, Anandaroop Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1115/1.4063917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we present our results on a relatively new kind of blower called Volumetric Resistance Blower (VRB) for cooling of portable computing platforms like laptop computers. The VRB performance was modeled numerically and compared to traditional bladed blowers. The sources of noise, dominant in bladed blower are absent in case of VRB, because it uses a continuous porous disc instead of discrete blades. Thus, even though at iso-rpm, VRB yielded lower flow rate, its iso acoustic performance could be superior. Hence, further analysis was crucial to quantify the potential benefit. The acoustics experiments for bladed blower and VRB were conducted in a hemi-anechoic chamber in accordance with ECMA-74[1] and ECMA TR/99 [2] standards. Iso-acoustics pressure vs volume flow rate plot for both bladed blower and VRB are compared. VRB was found to have superior performance as compared to bladed blower. The volume flow rate at open flow condition for bladed blower and VRB are comparable, but as back pressure increased the flow rate yielded by VRB kept increasing and at stagnation condition, VRB showed around 79% higher static pressure. In the second part of the work, the experimentally validated numerical model for VRB was used for numerical optimization using a DOE approach and varying the geometrical parameters. Rotor distance (minimum distance from the axis of rotation of impeller to the cutwater surface) was found to be the most important parameter and an optimum value was found. A second DOE elucidated the optimal rotor hub center location in the 2-dimensional space inside the casing as when the rotor is tucked back into the casing as much as possible and when the rotor distance is above 20.15 mm. A partial P-Q curve is generated (up to 20 Pa) for optimal geometry configuration. Based on the numerical and experimental evidence, VRB is found to have the potential to replace traditional bladed design in portable computing devices. In addition, due to absence of blades, it creates lower tonal noise, giving a much more comfortable experience to the end user.","PeriodicalId":15663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electronic Packaging","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical And Experimental Investigation Of A Volumetric Resistance Blower Performance And Its Optimization For Portable Computing Device Applications\",\"authors\":\"Amit Kumar, Ayan Majumder, Ruander Cardenas, Mark MacDonald, Anandaroop Bhattacharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper, we present our results on a relatively new kind of blower called Volumetric Resistance Blower (VRB) for cooling of portable computing platforms like laptop computers. The VRB performance was modeled numerically and compared to traditional bladed blowers. The sources of noise, dominant in bladed blower are absent in case of VRB, because it uses a continuous porous disc instead of discrete blades. Thus, even though at iso-rpm, VRB yielded lower flow rate, its iso acoustic performance could be superior. Hence, further analysis was crucial to quantify the potential benefit. The acoustics experiments for bladed blower and VRB were conducted in a hemi-anechoic chamber in accordance with ECMA-74[1] and ECMA TR/99 [2] standards. Iso-acoustics pressure vs volume flow rate plot for both bladed blower and VRB are compared. VRB was found to have superior performance as compared to bladed blower. The volume flow rate at open flow condition for bladed blower and VRB are comparable, but as back pressure increased the flow rate yielded by VRB kept increasing and at stagnation condition, VRB showed around 79% higher static pressure. In the second part of the work, the experimentally validated numerical model for VRB was used for numerical optimization using a DOE approach and varying the geometrical parameters. Rotor distance (minimum distance from the axis of rotation of impeller to the cutwater surface) was found to be the most important parameter and an optimum value was found. A second DOE elucidated the optimal rotor hub center location in the 2-dimensional space inside the casing as when the rotor is tucked back into the casing as much as possible and when the rotor distance is above 20.15 mm. A partial P-Q curve is generated (up to 20 Pa) for optimal geometry configuration. Based on the numerical and experimental evidence, VRB is found to have the potential to replace traditional bladed design in portable computing devices. In addition, due to absence of blades, it creates lower tonal noise, giving a much more comfortable experience to the end user.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electronic Packaging\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electronic Packaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063917\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electronic Packaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们介绍了一种相对较新的鼓风机称为体积阻力鼓风机(VRB)的冷却便携式计算平台,如笔记本电脑的研究结果。数值模拟了VRB的性能,并与传统的叶片鼓风机进行了比较。在有叶鼓风机中占主导地位的噪声源在VRB的情况下是不存在的,因为它使用连续的多孔圆盘而不是离散的叶片。因此,即使在等转速下,VRB产生的流量较低,但其等声性能可能更好。因此,进一步的分析对于量化潜在的好处至关重要。根据ECMA-74[1]和ECMA TR/99[2]标准,在半消声室中对叶片鼓风机和VRB进行声学实验。比较了叶片鼓风机和VRB的等声压力-体积流量图。与有叶鼓风机相比,VRB具有更优越的性能。带叶鼓风机与VRB在开流条件下的体积流量相当,但随着背压的增加,VRB的流量不断增加,在停滞状态下,VRB的静压高79%左右。在第二部分的工作中,利用实验验证的VRB数值模型,采用DOE方法和改变几何参数进行数值优化。发现转子距离(叶轮旋转轴到切割水面的最小距离)是最重要的参数,并找到了最优值。第二次DOE分析表明,转子在机匣内二维空间的最佳轮毂中心位置为转子尽可能向后塞入机匣内且转子距离大于20.15 mm。部分P-Q曲线生成(高达20 Pa)为最佳的几何结构。基于数值和实验证据,VRB在便携式计算设备中具有取代传统叶片设计的潜力。此外,由于没有叶片,它产生更低的音调噪音,给最终用户一个更舒适的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical And Experimental Investigation Of A Volumetric Resistance Blower Performance And Its Optimization For Portable Computing Device Applications
Abstract In this paper, we present our results on a relatively new kind of blower called Volumetric Resistance Blower (VRB) for cooling of portable computing platforms like laptop computers. The VRB performance was modeled numerically and compared to traditional bladed blowers. The sources of noise, dominant in bladed blower are absent in case of VRB, because it uses a continuous porous disc instead of discrete blades. Thus, even though at iso-rpm, VRB yielded lower flow rate, its iso acoustic performance could be superior. Hence, further analysis was crucial to quantify the potential benefit. The acoustics experiments for bladed blower and VRB were conducted in a hemi-anechoic chamber in accordance with ECMA-74[1] and ECMA TR/99 [2] standards. Iso-acoustics pressure vs volume flow rate plot for both bladed blower and VRB are compared. VRB was found to have superior performance as compared to bladed blower. The volume flow rate at open flow condition for bladed blower and VRB are comparable, but as back pressure increased the flow rate yielded by VRB kept increasing and at stagnation condition, VRB showed around 79% higher static pressure. In the second part of the work, the experimentally validated numerical model for VRB was used for numerical optimization using a DOE approach and varying the geometrical parameters. Rotor distance (minimum distance from the axis of rotation of impeller to the cutwater surface) was found to be the most important parameter and an optimum value was found. A second DOE elucidated the optimal rotor hub center location in the 2-dimensional space inside the casing as when the rotor is tucked back into the casing as much as possible and when the rotor distance is above 20.15 mm. A partial P-Q curve is generated (up to 20 Pa) for optimal geometry configuration. Based on the numerical and experimental evidence, VRB is found to have the potential to replace traditional bladed design in portable computing devices. In addition, due to absence of blades, it creates lower tonal noise, giving a much more comfortable experience to the end user.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Electronic Packaging
Journal of Electronic Packaging 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electronic Packaging publishes papers that use experimental and theoretical (analytical and computer-aided) methods, approaches, and techniques to address and solve various mechanical, materials, and reliability problems encountered in the analysis, design, manufacturing, testing, and operation of electronic and photonics components, devices, and systems. Scope: Microsystems packaging; Systems integration; Flexible electronics; Materials with nano structures and in general small scale systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信