2019冠状病毒病大流行对肿瘤学良好临床实践试验的影响

Q3 Medicine
Veronica Agostinelli, Zelmira Ballatore, Giulia Ricci, Alessandra Lucarelli, Michela Burattini, Lorenzo Mariotti, Claudia Catani, Valentina Tarantino, Rossana Berardi
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行对肿瘤学良好临床实践试验的影响","authors":"Veronica Agostinelli, Zelmira Ballatore, Giulia Ricci, Alessandra Lucarelli, Michela Burattini, Lorenzo Mariotti, Claudia Catani, Valentina Tarantino, Rossana Berardi","doi":"10.37349/etat.2023.00183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became pandemic on 11th March 2020 and it deeply stressed the healthcare system. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population, so many recommendations have been approved to ensure optimal management. Clinical research was notably impacted by COVID too. This review aims to analyze the challenges occurred during a pandemic for the management of enrolled patients (enrollment, use of telemedicine visits, study procedures) and for the clinical trials system (from feasibility to selection visit, site initiation visit, monitorings, use of e-signature, deviations and discontinuations). Methods: The studies included in the present review were selected from PubMed/Google Scholar/ScienceDirect databases. Results: During the first phase of pandemic many clinical trials were suspended in accrual and, as the pandemic progressed, recommendations were established to guarantee the safety and the continuity of care of enrolled patients. In addition, lot of new strategies was found during the pandemic to reduce the negative consequences on clinical trial performance and to guarantee new opportunities of care in the respect of good clinical practice (GCP) in a bad scenario. Conclusions: Among all modifiers, investigators would prefer to maintain the positive ones such as pragmatic and simplified trial designs and protocols, reducing in-person visits when not necessary and to minimizing sponsor and contract research organizations (CROs) visits.","PeriodicalId":73002,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on good clinical practice trials in oncology\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Agostinelli, Zelmira Ballatore, Giulia Ricci, Alessandra Lucarelli, Michela Burattini, Lorenzo Mariotti, Claudia Catani, Valentina Tarantino, Rossana Berardi\",\"doi\":\"10.37349/etat.2023.00183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became pandemic on 11th March 2020 and it deeply stressed the healthcare system. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population, so many recommendations have been approved to ensure optimal management. Clinical research was notably impacted by COVID too. This review aims to analyze the challenges occurred during a pandemic for the management of enrolled patients (enrollment, use of telemedicine visits, study procedures) and for the clinical trials system (from feasibility to selection visit, site initiation visit, monitorings, use of e-signature, deviations and discontinuations). Methods: The studies included in the present review were selected from PubMed/Google Scholar/ScienceDirect databases. Results: During the first phase of pandemic many clinical trials were suspended in accrual and, as the pandemic progressed, recommendations were established to guarantee the safety and the continuity of care of enrolled patients. In addition, lot of new strategies was found during the pandemic to reduce the negative consequences on clinical trial performance and to guarantee new opportunities of care in the respect of good clinical practice (GCP) in a bad scenario. Conclusions: Among all modifiers, investigators would prefer to maintain the positive ones such as pragmatic and simplified trial designs and protocols, reducing in-person visits when not necessary and to minimizing sponsor and contract research organizations (CROs) visits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37349/etat.2023.00183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/etat.2023.00183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)于2020年3月11日成为大流行,给医疗保健系统带来了沉重压力。癌症患者是弱势群体,因此许多建议被批准以确保最佳管理。临床研究也受到了明显的影响。本综述旨在分析大流行期间对入组患者的管理(入组、远程医疗访问的使用、研究程序)和临床试验系统(从可行性到选择访问、现场启动访问、监测、使用电子签名、偏差和中断)所面临的挑战。方法:本综述纳入的研究从PubMed/Google Scholar/ScienceDirect数据库中选择。结果:在大流行的第一阶段,许多临床试验暂停进行,随着大流行的进展,制定了建议,以保证入组患者的安全性和护理的连续性。此外,在大流行期间发现了许多新战略,以减少对临床试验绩效的负面影响,并保证在糟糕情况下在良好临床实践方面提供新的护理机会。结论:在所有的修饰因素中,研究者更倾向于保持积极的因素,如实用和简化的试验设计和方案,减少不必要的亲自访问,并尽量减少赞助商和合同研究组织(cro)的访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on good clinical practice trials in oncology
Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became pandemic on 11th March 2020 and it deeply stressed the healthcare system. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population, so many recommendations have been approved to ensure optimal management. Clinical research was notably impacted by COVID too. This review aims to analyze the challenges occurred during a pandemic for the management of enrolled patients (enrollment, use of telemedicine visits, study procedures) and for the clinical trials system (from feasibility to selection visit, site initiation visit, monitorings, use of e-signature, deviations and discontinuations). Methods: The studies included in the present review were selected from PubMed/Google Scholar/ScienceDirect databases. Results: During the first phase of pandemic many clinical trials were suspended in accrual and, as the pandemic progressed, recommendations were established to guarantee the safety and the continuity of care of enrolled patients. In addition, lot of new strategies was found during the pandemic to reduce the negative consequences on clinical trial performance and to guarantee new opportunities of care in the respect of good clinical practice (GCP) in a bad scenario. Conclusions: Among all modifiers, investigators would prefer to maintain the positive ones such as pragmatic and simplified trial designs and protocols, reducing in-person visits when not necessary and to minimizing sponsor and contract research organizations (CROs) visits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信