宗教与国际关系研究中的社会重组

IF 3.1 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

International Studies Review Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1093/isr/viad037

Peter S Henne

{"title":"宗教与国际关系研究中的社会重组","authors":"Peter S Henne","doi":"10.1093/isr/viad037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research into religion and international relations (RIR) has come incredibly far in the decades since 9/11. However, a tension remains in this research program, as neopositivist scholars simultaneously argue religion both has an independent effect on and interacts with international politics. This has raised critiques of religion’s importance. Relational work in international relations—inspired by scholars such as Bourdieu, LaTour, and Tilly—provides a means to overcome this obstacle. While some works on RIR have drawn on this tradition, it has yet to be systematized. In this review article, I discuss three recent books that highlight both the limits of the current approach to RIR and the potential to move it forward by drawing on relational analyses. I also provide guidelines for adjusting future work in this research program.","PeriodicalId":54206,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassembling the Social in the Study of Religion and International Relations\",\"authors\":\"Peter S Henne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/isr/viad037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Research into religion and international relations (RIR) has come incredibly far in the decades since 9/11. However, a tension remains in this research program, as neopositivist scholars simultaneously argue religion both has an independent effect on and interacts with international politics. This has raised critiques of religion’s importance. Relational work in international relations—inspired by scholars such as Bourdieu, LaTour, and Tilly—provides a means to overcome this obstacle. While some works on RIR have drawn on this tradition, it has yet to be systematized. In this review article, I discuss three recent books that highlight both the limits of the current approach to RIR and the potential to move it forward by drawing on relational analyses. I also provide guidelines for adjusting future work in this research program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Studies Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad037\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

自9/11以来的几十年里，宗教与国际关系的研究取得了令人难以置信的进展。然而，新实证主义学者同时认为，宗教既对国际政治有独立的影响，又与国际政治相互作用，因此这一研究项目中仍然存在一种紧张关系。这引发了对宗教重要性的批评。受布迪厄、拉图尔和蒂尔等学者的启发，国际关系中的关系研究为克服这一障碍提供了一种手段。虽然一些关于RIR的工作借鉴了这一传统，但它尚未系统化。在这篇评论文章中，我讨论了最近出版的三本书，它们强调了当前RIR方法的局限性，以及利用关系分析将其向前推进的潜力。我还提供了调整本研究项目未来工作的指导方针。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reassembling the Social in the Study of Religion and International Relations

Abstract Research into religion and international relations (RIR) has come incredibly far in the decades since 9/11. However, a tension remains in this research program, as neopositivist scholars simultaneously argue religion both has an independent effect on and interacts with international politics. This has raised critiques of religion’s importance. Relational work in international relations—inspired by scholars such as Bourdieu, LaTour, and Tilly—provides a means to overcome this obstacle. While some works on RIR have drawn on this tradition, it has yet to be systematized. In this review article, I discuss three recent books that highlight both the limits of the current approach to RIR and the potential to move it forward by drawing on relational analyses. I also provide guidelines for adjusting future work in this research program.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Studies Review Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Studies Review (ISR) provides a window on current trends and research in international studies worldwide. Published four times a year, ISR is intended to help: (a) scholars engage in the kind of dialogue and debate that will shape the field of international studies in the future, (b) graduate and undergraduate students understand major issues in international studies and identify promising opportunities for research, and (c) educators keep up with new ideas and research. To achieve these objectives, ISR includes analytical essays, reviews of new books, and a forum in each issue. Essays integrate scholarship, clarify debates, provide new perspectives on research, identify new directions for the field, and present insights into scholarship in various parts of the world.