班主任对主流教育挑战的看法调查

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Elvan BARAN KARALAR, Atlas BOGENÇ, Tevhide KARGIN
{"title":"班主任对主流教育挑战的看法调查","authors":"Elvan BARAN KARALAR, Atlas BOGENÇ, Tevhide KARGIN","doi":"10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1078468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One of the most important factors in mainstreaming practices is the teacher. The role of the created class and psychological guidance, such as ensuring social cohesion between students with special educational needs and their peers, and the active inclusion of families throughout their life, cannot be denied. It is expected that the opinions and expectations regarding the inclusion difficulties and experiences of the classroom and guidance teachers working in primary schools in the province of Istanbul are reached. Method: In the study in which the case study model, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used; semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven classroom teachers who have inclusion students in their classroom and six psychological counselor/guidance teachers who have inclusion students in their school. By applying content analysis to the data obtained from the interviews, the main themes and sub-themes were formed and the findings were reached. Findings: Research findings show that classroom teachers prepare the individualized education program (IEP) with the help of the guidance teacher. The school administration does not have enough information about the inclusion practice because the classrooms are crowded. Thus the teachers have difficulty in gaining academic skills, as well as finding and adapting appropriate materials for mainstreaming students. Counselors, on the other hand, state that the IEP development unit remains on paper, that all responsibilities related to IEP are assigned to them, and that the school administration does not cooperate on inclusion. In addition, both classroom teachers and guidance teachers stated that the communication and cooperation they established with the institutions where the student received support education was one-sided and they did not receive any feedback regarding the student. The fact that families do not accept their children's inadequacy, and do not have enough information about inclusion, is another finding that makes cooperation difficult for classroom and guidance teachers. Discussion: The findings obtained from the research revealed the necessity of the classroom and guidance teachers to be in cooperation with the school, family and stakeholders who provide support education to the students in the inclusive practice. This cooperation will enable the student's educational process to improve their learning better. It is recommended to conduct experimental studies based on school-family cooperation in similar studies.","PeriodicalId":42594,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi-Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Investigation on the Opinions of Class and Guidance Teachers About the Challenges in Mainstream Education\",\"authors\":\"Elvan BARAN KARALAR, Atlas BOGENÇ, Tevhide KARGIN\",\"doi\":\"10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1078468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: One of the most important factors in mainstreaming practices is the teacher. The role of the created class and psychological guidance, such as ensuring social cohesion between students with special educational needs and their peers, and the active inclusion of families throughout their life, cannot be denied. It is expected that the opinions and expectations regarding the inclusion difficulties and experiences of the classroom and guidance teachers working in primary schools in the province of Istanbul are reached. Method: In the study in which the case study model, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used; semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven classroom teachers who have inclusion students in their classroom and six psychological counselor/guidance teachers who have inclusion students in their school. By applying content analysis to the data obtained from the interviews, the main themes and sub-themes were formed and the findings were reached. Findings: Research findings show that classroom teachers prepare the individualized education program (IEP) with the help of the guidance teacher. The school administration does not have enough information about the inclusion practice because the classrooms are crowded. Thus the teachers have difficulty in gaining academic skills, as well as finding and adapting appropriate materials for mainstreaming students. Counselors, on the other hand, state that the IEP development unit remains on paper, that all responsibilities related to IEP are assigned to them, and that the school administration does not cooperate on inclusion. In addition, both classroom teachers and guidance teachers stated that the communication and cooperation they established with the institutions where the student received support education was one-sided and they did not receive any feedback regarding the student. The fact that families do not accept their children's inadequacy, and do not have enough information about inclusion, is another finding that makes cooperation difficult for classroom and guidance teachers. Discussion: The findings obtained from the research revealed the necessity of the classroom and guidance teachers to be in cooperation with the school, family and stakeholders who provide support education to the students in the inclusive practice. This cooperation will enable the student's educational process to improve their learning better. It is recommended to conduct experimental studies based on school-family cooperation in similar studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi-Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi-Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1078468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi-Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1078468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在主流化实践中最重要的因素之一是教师。创建班级和心理指导的作用,例如确保有特殊教育需要的学生与其同龄人之间的社会凝聚力,以及家庭在其一生中的积极包容,是不可否认的。预期将就伊斯坦布尔省小学课堂教师和指导教师的融入困难和经验达成意见和期望。方法:本研究采用定性研究方法之一的案例研究模式;采用半结构式访谈法对7名有包容学生的任课教师和6名有包容学生的心理咨询师/指导教师进行访谈。通过对访谈数据进行内容分析,形成主题和次主题,得出研究结果。研究发现:课堂教师在指导教师的帮助下制定个性化教育计划(IEP)。由于教室拥挤,学校管理部门对包容性实践没有足够的信息。因此,教师很难获得学术技能,也很难为主流学生找到和改编合适的材料。另一方面,辅导员则表示,IEP发展单位仍停留在纸面上,与IEP相关的所有责任都分配给了他们,学校行政部门在包容性方面并不合作。此外,任课教师和辅导教师都表示,他们与学生接受支持教育的机构建立的沟通与合作是片面的,他们没有收到任何关于学生的反馈。事实上,家庭不接受孩子的不足,并且没有足够的关于包容的信息,这是另一个使课堂教师和指导教师难以合作的发现。讨论:研究结果揭示了课堂和指导教师在全纳实践中与学校、家庭和利益相关者合作的必要性,这些利益相关者为学生提供支持教育。这种合作将使学生的教育过程更好地提高他们的学习。在类似的研究中,建议进行基于校家合作的实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Investigation on the Opinions of Class and Guidance Teachers About the Challenges in Mainstream Education
Introduction: One of the most important factors in mainstreaming practices is the teacher. The role of the created class and psychological guidance, such as ensuring social cohesion between students with special educational needs and their peers, and the active inclusion of families throughout their life, cannot be denied. It is expected that the opinions and expectations regarding the inclusion difficulties and experiences of the classroom and guidance teachers working in primary schools in the province of Istanbul are reached. Method: In the study in which the case study model, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used; semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven classroom teachers who have inclusion students in their classroom and six psychological counselor/guidance teachers who have inclusion students in their school. By applying content analysis to the data obtained from the interviews, the main themes and sub-themes were formed and the findings were reached. Findings: Research findings show that classroom teachers prepare the individualized education program (IEP) with the help of the guidance teacher. The school administration does not have enough information about the inclusion practice because the classrooms are crowded. Thus the teachers have difficulty in gaining academic skills, as well as finding and adapting appropriate materials for mainstreaming students. Counselors, on the other hand, state that the IEP development unit remains on paper, that all responsibilities related to IEP are assigned to them, and that the school administration does not cooperate on inclusion. In addition, both classroom teachers and guidance teachers stated that the communication and cooperation they established with the institutions where the student received support education was one-sided and they did not receive any feedback regarding the student. The fact that families do not accept their children's inadequacy, and do not have enough information about inclusion, is another finding that makes cooperation difficult for classroom and guidance teachers. Discussion: The findings obtained from the research revealed the necessity of the classroom and guidance teachers to be in cooperation with the school, family and stakeholders who provide support education to the students in the inclusive practice. This cooperation will enable the student's educational process to improve their learning better. It is recommended to conduct experimental studies based on school-family cooperation in similar studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信