开放与半封闭两种手术方式治疗毛毛窦的效果比较

Hamed Fallah, Mehrdad Sayadiniya, Majid Safarpanah
{"title":"开放与半封闭两种手术方式治疗毛毛窦的效果比较","authors":"Hamed Fallah, Mehrdad Sayadiniya, Majid Safarpanah","doi":"10.18502/jzms.v6i1.13601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pilonidal sinus is an inflammatory disease that occurs acutely and chronically in the sacrococcygeal region. The pathogenesis of the disease is not precisely known and the treatment of choice is surgery; which can be done in different ways. In the present study, the results of two open and semi-closed surgical methods were investigated and compared.&#x0D; Methods: A total of 150 patients with pilonidal sinus referred to Bandar Abbas Shahid Mohammadi Hospital who were candidates for surgery were randomly divided into two equal groups including group 1 with open surgery and group 2 with semi-closed surgery. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.&#x0D; Results: In the current study 150 patients were analyzed which divided into two groups consisting of 75 patients in each one of them and one group (group 1) and another group (group 2) were treated with open and semi-closure techniques, respectively. In group one were 52 male and 23 female patients, in group two 53 male and 22 female, group one and two average age were 26.17 ± 8.4 and 25.81 ± 8, respectively.&#x0D; Conclusion: Overall results of the study demonstrate that there is no significant difference between the two procedures on recurrence and postoperative infection perspectives and also there was a significant privilege in semi-closure technique on hospitalization time, healing period, avoidance of work perspectives. And also this study demonstrated there is no significant relationship between demographic features and side effect incidents.","PeriodicalId":496933,"journal":{"name":"مجله دانشکده پزشکی زابل","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Results of Two Open and Semi-Closed Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus\",\"authors\":\"Hamed Fallah, Mehrdad Sayadiniya, Majid Safarpanah\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jzms.v6i1.13601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pilonidal sinus is an inflammatory disease that occurs acutely and chronically in the sacrococcygeal region. The pathogenesis of the disease is not precisely known and the treatment of choice is surgery; which can be done in different ways. In the present study, the results of two open and semi-closed surgical methods were investigated and compared.&#x0D; Methods: A total of 150 patients with pilonidal sinus referred to Bandar Abbas Shahid Mohammadi Hospital who were candidates for surgery were randomly divided into two equal groups including group 1 with open surgery and group 2 with semi-closed surgery. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.&#x0D; Results: In the current study 150 patients were analyzed which divided into two groups consisting of 75 patients in each one of them and one group (group 1) and another group (group 2) were treated with open and semi-closure techniques, respectively. In group one were 52 male and 23 female patients, in group two 53 male and 22 female, group one and two average age were 26.17 ± 8.4 and 25.81 ± 8, respectively.&#x0D; Conclusion: Overall results of the study demonstrate that there is no significant difference between the two procedures on recurrence and postoperative infection perspectives and also there was a significant privilege in semi-closure technique on hospitalization time, healing period, avoidance of work perspectives. And also this study demonstrated there is no significant relationship between demographic features and side effect incidents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"مجله دانشکده پزشکی زابل\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"مجله دانشکده پزشکی زابل\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jzms.v6i1.13601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"مجله دانشکده پزشکی زابل","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jzms.v6i1.13601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:毛突窦是一种发生在骶尾骨区域的急性和慢性炎症性疾病。疾病的发病机制尚不清楚,治疗的选择是手术;这可以通过不同的方式实现。在本研究中,我们比较了两种开放和半封闭的手术方式的结果。 方法:将150例经阿巴斯沙希德医院转诊的拟行手术治疗的毛窦患者随机分为两组,1组采用开放手术,2组采用半封闭手术。P值<0.05被认为是显著的。 结果:本研究共分析150例患者,将其分为两组,每组75例,分别采用开腹和半闭腹术治疗一组(组1)和一组(组2)。组1男52例,女23例,组2男53例,女22例,组1和组2平均年龄分别为26.17±8.4和25.81±8岁。 结论:两种术式在复发和术后感染角度上无显著差异,在住院时间、愈合时间、避免工作角度上有显著优势。这项研究也证明了人口统计学特征和副作用事件之间没有显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Results of Two Open and Semi-Closed Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus
Background: Pilonidal sinus is an inflammatory disease that occurs acutely and chronically in the sacrococcygeal region. The pathogenesis of the disease is not precisely known and the treatment of choice is surgery; which can be done in different ways. In the present study, the results of two open and semi-closed surgical methods were investigated and compared. Methods: A total of 150 patients with pilonidal sinus referred to Bandar Abbas Shahid Mohammadi Hospital who were candidates for surgery were randomly divided into two equal groups including group 1 with open surgery and group 2 with semi-closed surgery. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In the current study 150 patients were analyzed which divided into two groups consisting of 75 patients in each one of them and one group (group 1) and another group (group 2) were treated with open and semi-closure techniques, respectively. In group one were 52 male and 23 female patients, in group two 53 male and 22 female, group one and two average age were 26.17 ± 8.4 and 25.81 ± 8, respectively. Conclusion: Overall results of the study demonstrate that there is no significant difference between the two procedures on recurrence and postoperative infection perspectives and also there was a significant privilege in semi-closure technique on hospitalization time, healing period, avoidance of work perspectives. And also this study demonstrated there is no significant relationship between demographic features and side effect incidents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信