{"title":"被遗忘的破产史(1543-1624","authors":"Fleur Stolker","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2023.2274693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the foundations of bankruptcy law in England. Rather than looking at the bankruptcy statutes that were aimed at fraudulent insolvent debtors, it analyses debt settlements of honest insolvent debtors awarded by the court of Chancery between 1543 and 1628. It shows that these agreements were not only aimed at relieving creditors, but also financially rehabilitated debtors if they had become insolvent for reasons beyond their own control. Most debt settlements in the period were awarded following a bill of conformity procedure, in which a minority of creditors could be forced to agree to a settlement. Up to 1621 it was standard practice for debt settlements to include financial rehabilitation. The Chancery ordered delay of payment, part and full discharges of debts or alternative payment plans. Political struggles and fraudulent practices in the early 1620s ended this highly pragmatic practice, which was only to be restored centuries later.","PeriodicalId":43796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal History","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Forgotten History of Bankruptcy, 1543–1624\",\"authors\":\"Fleur Stolker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01440365.2023.2274693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the foundations of bankruptcy law in England. Rather than looking at the bankruptcy statutes that were aimed at fraudulent insolvent debtors, it analyses debt settlements of honest insolvent debtors awarded by the court of Chancery between 1543 and 1628. It shows that these agreements were not only aimed at relieving creditors, but also financially rehabilitated debtors if they had become insolvent for reasons beyond their own control. Most debt settlements in the period were awarded following a bill of conformity procedure, in which a minority of creditors could be forced to agree to a settlement. Up to 1621 it was standard practice for debt settlements to include financial rehabilitation. The Chancery ordered delay of payment, part and full discharges of debts or alternative payment plans. Political struggles and fraudulent practices in the early 1620s ended this highly pragmatic practice, which was only to be restored centuries later.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2023.2274693\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2023.2274693","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文考察了英国破产法的基础。本文没有研究针对欺诈性破产债务人的破产法规,而是分析了衡平法院(court of Chancery)在1543年至1628年间裁定的诚实破产债务人的债务和解。它表明,这些协定的目的不仅在于救济债权人,而且也在于使债务人在财政上得到恢复,如果它们由于自身无法控制的原因而破产的话。在本报告所述期间,大多数债务解决方案都是按照一种符合规定的程序作出的,在这种程序中,少数债权人可能被迫同意一项解决方案。直到1621年,债务解决的标准做法包括财务恢复。衡平法官处命令延期付款、部分或全部清偿债务或采取其他付款计划。1620年代早期的政治斗争和欺诈行为终结了这种高度实用主义的做法,几个世纪后才得以恢复。
This article examines the foundations of bankruptcy law in England. Rather than looking at the bankruptcy statutes that were aimed at fraudulent insolvent debtors, it analyses debt settlements of honest insolvent debtors awarded by the court of Chancery between 1543 and 1628. It shows that these agreements were not only aimed at relieving creditors, but also financially rehabilitated debtors if they had become insolvent for reasons beyond their own control. Most debt settlements in the period were awarded following a bill of conformity procedure, in which a minority of creditors could be forced to agree to a settlement. Up to 1621 it was standard practice for debt settlements to include financial rehabilitation. The Chancery ordered delay of payment, part and full discharges of debts or alternative payment plans. Political struggles and fraudulent practices in the early 1620s ended this highly pragmatic practice, which was only to be restored centuries later.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Legal History, founded in 1980, is the only British journal concerned solely with legal history. It publishes articles in English on the sources and development of the common law, both in the British Isles and overseas, on the history of the laws of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and on Roman Law and the European legal tradition. There is a section for shorter research notes, review-articles, and a wide-ranging section of reviews of recent literature.