米糠油在纳米囊泡中的比较与稳定性研究:常规乳质体与ph敏感乳质体

Sureewan Duangjit, Chudanut Akarachinwanit, Warisada Sila-on, Sureewan Bumrungthai, Praneet Opanasopit, Tanasait Ngawhirunpat
{"title":"米糠油在纳米囊泡中的比较与稳定性研究:常规乳质体与ph敏感乳质体","authors":"Sureewan Duangjit, Chudanut Akarachinwanit, Warisada Sila-on, Sureewan Bumrungthai, Praneet Opanasopit, Tanasait Ngawhirunpat","doi":"10.12982/nlsc.2023.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Niosomes are more stable and economical than liposomes. In previous studies, conventional niosomes have shown advantages for transdermal delivery of bioactive compounds from rice bran. The objective of this study was to compare nanovesicle formulations (conventional niosomes and pH-sensitive niosomes) containing oryzanol (OZ) and rice bran oil (RBO). The formulation parameters were varied for the types of model drugs (OZ pure compound and RBO), the content of RBO loading (low, medium, high), and the types of niosomes (conventional niosomes and pH-sensitive niosomes). The physicochemical properties, e.g., vesicle size, size distribution, zeta potential and oryzanol content, were investigated. The stability of nanovesicles during the incubation period from Day 1 to Day 90 was observed. The in vitro skin permeation of the niosome formulation was demonstrated and calculated from the skin permeation flux and the permeability coefficient. The results indicated that the OZ- and RBO-loaded nanovesicle formulation had nanoscale vesicles (under 205 nm) and a narrow size distribution (0.22-0.55). The OZ content in the formulation was up to 300 µg/mL. The RBO-loaded nanovesicle formulations were stable at 4 and 25 °C for 90 days and 40 °C for 30 days. The skin permeation parameters of pH-sensitive niosomes were significantly higher than those of conventional niosomes at a flux of 16.56 ± 3.37 µg/cm2/h and a permeability coefficient of 0.0542 ± 0.011 cm2/h. These results suggest that pH-sensitive niosomes can be promoted and used as drug delivery carriers for rice bran oil. Keywords: Floral biology, Flower, Pollen, Microclimate, Heat unit Rice bran, Oryzanol, Liposome, Oleic acid, Permeability coefficient","PeriodicalId":471315,"journal":{"name":"Natural and Life Sciences Communications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative and Stability Study of Rice Bran Oil in Nanovesicle: Conventional Niosomes and pH-Sensitive Niosomes\",\"authors\":\"Sureewan Duangjit, Chudanut Akarachinwanit, Warisada Sila-on, Sureewan Bumrungthai, Praneet Opanasopit, Tanasait Ngawhirunpat\",\"doi\":\"10.12982/nlsc.2023.070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Niosomes are more stable and economical than liposomes. In previous studies, conventional niosomes have shown advantages for transdermal delivery of bioactive compounds from rice bran. The objective of this study was to compare nanovesicle formulations (conventional niosomes and pH-sensitive niosomes) containing oryzanol (OZ) and rice bran oil (RBO). The formulation parameters were varied for the types of model drugs (OZ pure compound and RBO), the content of RBO loading (low, medium, high), and the types of niosomes (conventional niosomes and pH-sensitive niosomes). The physicochemical properties, e.g., vesicle size, size distribution, zeta potential and oryzanol content, were investigated. The stability of nanovesicles during the incubation period from Day 1 to Day 90 was observed. The in vitro skin permeation of the niosome formulation was demonstrated and calculated from the skin permeation flux and the permeability coefficient. The results indicated that the OZ- and RBO-loaded nanovesicle formulation had nanoscale vesicles (under 205 nm) and a narrow size distribution (0.22-0.55). The OZ content in the formulation was up to 300 µg/mL. The RBO-loaded nanovesicle formulations were stable at 4 and 25 °C for 90 days and 40 °C for 30 days. The skin permeation parameters of pH-sensitive niosomes were significantly higher than those of conventional niosomes at a flux of 16.56 ± 3.37 µg/cm2/h and a permeability coefficient of 0.0542 ± 0.011 cm2/h. These results suggest that pH-sensitive niosomes can be promoted and used as drug delivery carriers for rice bran oil. Keywords: Floral biology, Flower, Pollen, Microclimate, Heat unit Rice bran, Oryzanol, Liposome, Oleic acid, Permeability coefficient\",\"PeriodicalId\":471315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural and Life Sciences Communications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural and Life Sciences Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12982/nlsc.2023.070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural and Life Sciences Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/nlsc.2023.070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳质体比脂质体更稳定、更经济。在以前的研究中,传统的纳米体在米糠生物活性化合物的透皮递送方面显示出优势。本研究的目的是比较含有米甲醇(OZ)和米糠油(RBO)的纳米囊泡制剂(传统纳米囊体和ph敏感纳米囊体)。根据模型药物类型(OZ纯化合物和RBO)、RBO含量(低、中、高)和乳质体类型(常规乳质体和ph敏感乳质体)不同,处方参数不同。考察了其理化性质,如囊泡大小、大小分布、zeta电位和稻谷醇含量等。在第1天至第90天的孵育期间,观察纳米囊泡的稳定性。通过皮肤渗透通量和渗透系数,证明并计算了纳米体制剂的体外皮肤渗透性。结果表明:负载OZ-和rbo的纳米囊泡制剂均为纳米级囊泡(205 nm以下),且粒径分布较窄(0.22 ~ 0.55);制剂中OZ含量可达300µg/mL。负载rbo的纳米囊泡制剂在4°C和25°C条件下稳定90天,在40°C条件下稳定30天。ph敏感乳质体的皮肤渗透参数显著高于常规乳质体,其通量为16.56±3.37µg/cm2/h,渗透系数为0.0542±0.011 cm2/h。这些结果表明,ph敏感乳质体可以作为米糠油的药物传递载体。关键词:花生物学,花,花粉,小气候,热单位米糠,谷维素,脂质体,油酸,渗透系数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative and Stability Study of Rice Bran Oil in Nanovesicle: Conventional Niosomes and pH-Sensitive Niosomes
Niosomes are more stable and economical than liposomes. In previous studies, conventional niosomes have shown advantages for transdermal delivery of bioactive compounds from rice bran. The objective of this study was to compare nanovesicle formulations (conventional niosomes and pH-sensitive niosomes) containing oryzanol (OZ) and rice bran oil (RBO). The formulation parameters were varied for the types of model drugs (OZ pure compound and RBO), the content of RBO loading (low, medium, high), and the types of niosomes (conventional niosomes and pH-sensitive niosomes). The physicochemical properties, e.g., vesicle size, size distribution, zeta potential and oryzanol content, were investigated. The stability of nanovesicles during the incubation period from Day 1 to Day 90 was observed. The in vitro skin permeation of the niosome formulation was demonstrated and calculated from the skin permeation flux and the permeability coefficient. The results indicated that the OZ- and RBO-loaded nanovesicle formulation had nanoscale vesicles (under 205 nm) and a narrow size distribution (0.22-0.55). The OZ content in the formulation was up to 300 µg/mL. The RBO-loaded nanovesicle formulations were stable at 4 and 25 °C for 90 days and 40 °C for 30 days. The skin permeation parameters of pH-sensitive niosomes were significantly higher than those of conventional niosomes at a flux of 16.56 ± 3.37 µg/cm2/h and a permeability coefficient of 0.0542 ± 0.011 cm2/h. These results suggest that pH-sensitive niosomes can be promoted and used as drug delivery carriers for rice bran oil. Keywords: Floral biology, Flower, Pollen, Microclimate, Heat unit Rice bran, Oryzanol, Liposome, Oleic acid, Permeability coefficient
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信