{"title":"投资儿子或女儿?中国农村父母的教育愿望","authors":"Xiying Wang, Binli Chen","doi":"10.1080/01425692.2023.2274817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBased on the first wave of the China Education Panel Survey, this study aims to test two competing mechanisms including son preference and meritocracy of leading to parents’ expectations of and investment in their children’s education. This article presents a general portrayal of academic performance among rural boys and girls. The findings depict a general pattern of parents’ investment: parents are more likely to invest in their daughters than sons, and fathers have a higher educational expectation of daughters. The influence of sibling numbers and ‘having a brother(s) or not’ on parents’ educational expectations and investment is similar for rural boys and girls. Fathers’ educational expectations are mainly based on the academic performance of their children (meritocracy) while mothers’ are more closely related to children’s gender. Son preference as a cultural characteristic remains influential in rural regions, although it is not as powerful as before and a trend towards egalitarianism is emerging.Keywords: Genderrural girlseducational aspirationsacademic achievementparental investmentChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The reason that most children in this study have siblings because one child policy was implemented differently in the urban and rural settings. In urban China, the policy was more strictly enforced, while in rural China, the policy has been revised since mid-1980s. If rural couple have the first child is a girl, they would be allowed to have another baby after 5 years. If the first child is a boy, they would be not allowed to have another baby.","PeriodicalId":48085,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology of Education","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investing in sons or daughters? The educational aspirations of rural parents in China\",\"authors\":\"Xiying Wang, Binli Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01425692.2023.2274817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractBased on the first wave of the China Education Panel Survey, this study aims to test two competing mechanisms including son preference and meritocracy of leading to parents’ expectations of and investment in their children’s education. This article presents a general portrayal of academic performance among rural boys and girls. The findings depict a general pattern of parents’ investment: parents are more likely to invest in their daughters than sons, and fathers have a higher educational expectation of daughters. The influence of sibling numbers and ‘having a brother(s) or not’ on parents’ educational expectations and investment is similar for rural boys and girls. Fathers’ educational expectations are mainly based on the academic performance of their children (meritocracy) while mothers’ are more closely related to children’s gender. Son preference as a cultural characteristic remains influential in rural regions, although it is not as powerful as before and a trend towards egalitarianism is emerging.Keywords: Genderrural girlseducational aspirationsacademic achievementparental investmentChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The reason that most children in this study have siblings because one child policy was implemented differently in the urban and rural settings. In urban China, the policy was more strictly enforced, while in rural China, the policy has been revised since mid-1980s. If rural couple have the first child is a girl, they would be allowed to have another baby after 5 years. If the first child is a boy, they would be not allowed to have another baby.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Sociology of Education\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Sociology of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2023.2274817\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2023.2274817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investing in sons or daughters? The educational aspirations of rural parents in China
AbstractBased on the first wave of the China Education Panel Survey, this study aims to test two competing mechanisms including son preference and meritocracy of leading to parents’ expectations of and investment in their children’s education. This article presents a general portrayal of academic performance among rural boys and girls. The findings depict a general pattern of parents’ investment: parents are more likely to invest in their daughters than sons, and fathers have a higher educational expectation of daughters. The influence of sibling numbers and ‘having a brother(s) or not’ on parents’ educational expectations and investment is similar for rural boys and girls. Fathers’ educational expectations are mainly based on the academic performance of their children (meritocracy) while mothers’ are more closely related to children’s gender. Son preference as a cultural characteristic remains influential in rural regions, although it is not as powerful as before and a trend towards egalitarianism is emerging.Keywords: Genderrural girlseducational aspirationsacademic achievementparental investmentChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The reason that most children in this study have siblings because one child policy was implemented differently in the urban and rural settings. In urban China, the policy was more strictly enforced, while in rural China, the policy has been revised since mid-1980s. If rural couple have the first child is a girl, they would be allowed to have another baby after 5 years. If the first child is a boy, they would be not allowed to have another baby.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Sociology of Education is one of the most renowned international scholarly journals in the field. The journal publishes high quality original, theoretically informed analyses of the relationship between education and society, and has an outstanding record of addressing major global debates about the social significance and impact of educational policy, provision, processes and practice in many countries around the world. The journal engages with a diverse range of contemporary and emergent social theories along with a wide range of methodological approaches. Articles investigate the discursive politics of education, social stratification and mobility, the social dimensions of all aspects of pedagogy and the curriculum, and the experiences of all those involved, from the most privileged to the most disadvantaged. The vitality of the journal is sustained by its commitment to offer independent, critical evaluations of the ways in which education interfaces with local, national, regional and global developments, contexts and agendas in all phases of formal and informal education. Contributions are expected to take into account the wide international readership of British Journal of Sociology of Education, and exhibit knowledge of previously published articles in the field. Submissions should be well located within sociological theory, and should not only be rigorous and reflexive methodologically, but also offer original insights to educational problems and or perspectives.