化疗方案对淋巴瘤的抗菌预防作用

Kamen W. Kossow, Joseph G. Bennett, Marc S Hoffmann
{"title":"化疗方案对淋巴瘤的抗菌预防作用","authors":"Kamen W. Kossow, Joseph G. Bennett, Marc S Hoffmann","doi":"10.33696/immunology.5.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment of lymphomas involves a wide variety of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted-agents tailored to disease biology and patient characteristics. Each of these regimens carry their own risk of opportunistic infections in an immunocompromised population. In addition to the treatment associated immunosuppression, lymphoma itself is immunosuppressive. Lymphoma associated immunosuppression is secondary to increased production of abnormal lymphocytes resulting in decreased production of normally functioning lymphocytes. Additionally, lymphoma cells induce both humoral and cellular immunosuppression through effects on numerous cytokines, T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and macrophages. Clinical trials, patient co-morbidities, and institutional preferences all play a role in determining the preferred antimicrobial prophylaxis. While there is a paucity of data on systematic reviews and guidelines for standardized chemotherapy regimens in lymphoma patients, the efficacy and recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis in specific chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma has not been fully reviewed. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, lymphoma is generally regarded as an ‘intermediate risk’ cancer with regards to overall infection risk. This results in discordance between research data and clinical practice. This is reiterated in the SIGNIFICANT trial which reported that while guidelines previously advised against fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in lymphoma and solid cancers, a survey of 3,600 physicians revealed that 45% routinely used fluoroquinolone prophylaxis despite these recommendations. This review article analyzes numerous research studies with summarization of findings and antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations based on specific lymphoma chemotherapy regimens. With regards to each specific chemotherapy regimen assessed, indications for antibacterial, anti-viral, anti-fungal, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis were determined for each regimen. The degree of immunosuppression and the necessary prophylaxis varies across different regimens and lymphoma subgroups; and thus, an individualized approach is necessary to optimize the supportive care during lymphoma treatment.","PeriodicalId":73644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cellular immunology","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Lymphoma by Chemotherapy Regimen\",\"authors\":\"Kamen W. Kossow, Joseph G. Bennett, Marc S Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.33696/immunology.5.175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Treatment of lymphomas involves a wide variety of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted-agents tailored to disease biology and patient characteristics. Each of these regimens carry their own risk of opportunistic infections in an immunocompromised population. In addition to the treatment associated immunosuppression, lymphoma itself is immunosuppressive. Lymphoma associated immunosuppression is secondary to increased production of abnormal lymphocytes resulting in decreased production of normally functioning lymphocytes. Additionally, lymphoma cells induce both humoral and cellular immunosuppression through effects on numerous cytokines, T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and macrophages. Clinical trials, patient co-morbidities, and institutional preferences all play a role in determining the preferred antimicrobial prophylaxis. While there is a paucity of data on systematic reviews and guidelines for standardized chemotherapy regimens in lymphoma patients, the efficacy and recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis in specific chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma has not been fully reviewed. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, lymphoma is generally regarded as an ‘intermediate risk’ cancer with regards to overall infection risk. This results in discordance between research data and clinical practice. This is reiterated in the SIGNIFICANT trial which reported that while guidelines previously advised against fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in lymphoma and solid cancers, a survey of 3,600 physicians revealed that 45% routinely used fluoroquinolone prophylaxis despite these recommendations. This review article analyzes numerous research studies with summarization of findings and antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations based on specific lymphoma chemotherapy regimens. With regards to each specific chemotherapy regimen assessed, indications for antibacterial, anti-viral, anti-fungal, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis were determined for each regimen. The degree of immunosuppression and the necessary prophylaxis varies across different regimens and lymphoma subgroups; and thus, an individualized approach is necessary to optimize the supportive care during lymphoma treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cellular immunology\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cellular immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33696/immunology.5.175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cellular immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/immunology.5.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淋巴瘤的治疗包括多种化疗、免疫治疗和针对疾病生物学和患者特征量身定制的靶向药物。在免疫功能低下的人群中,每一种方案都有其自身的机会性感染风险。除了治疗相关的免疫抑制外,淋巴瘤本身也是免疫抑制的。淋巴瘤相关的免疫抑制是继发于异常淋巴细胞的产生增加,导致正常功能淋巴细胞的产生减少。此外,淋巴瘤细胞通过对多种细胞因子、t细胞、髓源性抑制细胞和巨噬细胞的影响,诱导体液和细胞免疫抑制。临床试验、患者合并症和机构偏好都在确定首选抗菌药物预防方面发挥作用。虽然缺乏关于淋巴瘤患者标准化化疗方案的系统评价和指南的数据,但尚未对淋巴瘤特定化疗方案中的抗菌药物预防的疗效和建议进行全面审查。根据美国国家综合癌症网络,就整体感染风险而言,淋巴瘤通常被认为是一种“中等风险”癌症。这导致了研究数据和临床实践之间的不一致。这在一项重大试验中得到了重申,该试验报告称,虽然以前的指南建议在淋巴瘤和实体癌中不要使用氟喹诺酮类药物预防,但对3600名医生的调查显示,尽管有这些建议,45%的医生仍常规使用氟喹诺酮类药物预防。这篇综述文章分析了大量的研究,总结了研究结果和基于特定淋巴瘤化疗方案的抗菌预防建议。对于评估的每个特定化疗方案,确定每个方案的抗菌、抗病毒、抗真菌和肺囊虫肺炎(PJP)预防适应症。免疫抑制的程度和必要的预防在不同的方案和淋巴瘤亚群中有所不同;因此,个性化的方法是优化淋巴瘤治疗期间的支持护理的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Lymphoma by Chemotherapy Regimen
Treatment of lymphomas involves a wide variety of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted-agents tailored to disease biology and patient characteristics. Each of these regimens carry their own risk of opportunistic infections in an immunocompromised population. In addition to the treatment associated immunosuppression, lymphoma itself is immunosuppressive. Lymphoma associated immunosuppression is secondary to increased production of abnormal lymphocytes resulting in decreased production of normally functioning lymphocytes. Additionally, lymphoma cells induce both humoral and cellular immunosuppression through effects on numerous cytokines, T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and macrophages. Clinical trials, patient co-morbidities, and institutional preferences all play a role in determining the preferred antimicrobial prophylaxis. While there is a paucity of data on systematic reviews and guidelines for standardized chemotherapy regimens in lymphoma patients, the efficacy and recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis in specific chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma has not been fully reviewed. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, lymphoma is generally regarded as an ‘intermediate risk’ cancer with regards to overall infection risk. This results in discordance between research data and clinical practice. This is reiterated in the SIGNIFICANT trial which reported that while guidelines previously advised against fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in lymphoma and solid cancers, a survey of 3,600 physicians revealed that 45% routinely used fluoroquinolone prophylaxis despite these recommendations. This review article analyzes numerous research studies with summarization of findings and antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations based on specific lymphoma chemotherapy regimens. With regards to each specific chemotherapy regimen assessed, indications for antibacterial, anti-viral, anti-fungal, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis were determined for each regimen. The degree of immunosuppression and the necessary prophylaxis varies across different regimens and lymphoma subgroups; and thus, an individualized approach is necessary to optimize the supportive care during lymphoma treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信